Trending Now
We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for Eurasia Group and its affiliates, including GZERO Media, to clarify the types of data we collect, how we collect it, how we use data and with whom we share data. By using our website you consent to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, including the transfer of your personal data to the United States from your country of residence, and our use of cookies described in our Cookie Policy.
{{ subpage.title }}
Was it legal for Trump to deploy federal troops to Los Angeles?
In this clip from a larger interview for the latest episode of GZERO World, New York Times Magazine staff writer and Yale Law School fellow Emily Bazelon sits down with Ian Bremmer to unpack President Trump’s unprecedented decision to send National Guard troops and US Marines into Los Angeles without the governor’s consent. She argues the administration may have intentionally provoked the unrest through targeted immigration raids in the Latino neighborhoods of a densely populated city.
As California Governor Gavin Newsom sues the federal government, Bazelon makes clear that legal recourse may be limited. Even if Newsom wins, she says, Trump could comply with consultation requirements after the fact and proceed as planned. “The judges cannot save the country from an authoritarian president... by themselves,” Bazelon warns.
GZERO World with Ian Bremmer, the award-winning weekly global affairs series, airs nationwide on US public television stations (check local listings).
New digital episodes of GZERO World are released every Monday on YouTube. Don't miss an episode: subscribe to GZERO's YouTube channel and turn on notifications (🔔).
President Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
Trump White House on cusp of constitutional crisis
The Trump White House appears to be headed for a constitutional crisis, signaling that it intends to push back against judicial rulings that stand in the way of its goals.
Since his election, Trump’s team has pushed back against traditional checks and balances on presidential power, taking direct control of arm’s-length regulatory agencies, using upcoming primary contests to exert influence in Congress, and getting rid of lawyers, auditors, and other senior officials who might insist on following the rule of law.
That leaves the courts as a crucial check on the presidency, but there is now tension around deportation flights that the White House has used to expel migrants it says are members of a Venezuelan criminal organization. Trump has invoked the Alien Enemies Act, a 1798 law, to order them flown to a prison in El Salvador, denounced them as terrorists, and posted a video of their departure online.
Justice James E. Boasberg of the Federal District Court in Washington ordered flights be stopped while he considers a case contesting the validity of the act. The White House responded by carrying on with several flights, arguing that they were out of US airspace, and jurisdiction, by the time of the ruling. Trump and his allies called for Boasberg to be impeached and Trump denounced Boasberg as a “radical left lunatic.”
John G. Roberts Jr., chief justice of the Supreme Court, responded with an unusual statement rebuking Trump: “For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
Boasberg is demanding more information about the flights. Trump has said he will not defy the court's ruling, but administration lawyers have been notably non-cooperative with Boasberg’s requests.
"The president is clearly looking for excuses to ignore lawful judicial orders, but in doing so they are also challenging certain practices, including the use of nationwide injunctions by district courts that raise questions about the balance of power between the two co-equal branches of government,” says Eurasia Group’s US Director Jon Lieber.
“Ideally, Congress would step in and answer these questions, but that's not going to happen in the current environment, which means there is likely to be an accelerating showdown between a president who is pushing the boundaries of his authority and judges who are trying to restrain him."
President Donald Trump greets Chief Justice of the United States John G. Roberts Jr. as he arrives to deliver an address to a joint session of Congress at the US Capitol on March 04, 2025.
Trump vs. the courts: Republicans call for judge to be impeached
Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) filed impeachment articles against US District Court Judge James Boasberg Tuesday afternoon for blocking US President Donald Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport illegal immigrants and criminal gang members to Venezuela last week.
After his order for a 14-day deportation pause was ignored, Boasberg had demanded that Trump answer a set of questions by noon Tuesday, but that deadline passed without a response. Instead, in a Truth Social post on Tuesday morning, Trump blasted Boasberg, appointed by President Barack Obama, as a “Radical Left Lunatic” and said “This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!”
The post generated rare pushback from Supreme Court Justice – and George W. Bush appointee – John Roberts, whosaid that “for more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” adding “the normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
How could Boasberg be impeached? The House can impeach federal judges by majority vote, after which two-thirds of the Senate must vote for removal. The resolution has Trump’s support, but considering the Senate’s current split,that outcome is unlikely.
And there’s more. In other legal developments Tuesday, Maryland-based judge Theodore D. Chuangruled that DOGE and Elon Musk must stop their dismantlement of USAID. The Trump administration also began reinstating 24,000 probationary workers who were fired after US District Judge James Bredarordered their mass reinstatement last week. And finally, another judge blocked the administration from banning transgender people from serving in the military.