What We're Watching

Texas doubles down on border challenge to Federal government

​Texas Governor Gregg Abbott shakes hands with a U.S. Soldier after a news conference near the International Bridge between Mexico and the U.S., where migrants seeking asylum in the U.S. are waiting to be processed, in Del Rio, Texas, U.S., September 21, 2021.
Texas Governor Gregg Abbott shakes hands with a U.S. Soldier after a news conference near the International Bridge between Mexico and the U.S., where migrants seeking asylum in the U.S. are waiting to be processed, in Del Rio, Texas, U.S., September 21, 2021.
REUTERS/Marco Bello

A major constitutional crisis is brewing down south as Texas Gov. Gregg Abbott bucks the Supreme Court, forcing a confrontation between the state and federal government over who controls the US-Mexico border.

Earlier this week, the Supreme Court ruled that the Biden administration had the right to clear razor wire that local Texas authorities had installed along the border. Abbott has also taken his own measures to police crossings of the Rio Grande and even used the Texas National Guard to block federal agents from entering the area.

On Wednesday, Abbott released a statement declaring that despite the Supreme Court ruling, the Lone Star State will take control of deterring migration along its border with Mexico. In effect, he is defying the Supreme Court.

Although the US president technically controls the National Guard and the federal government has jurisdiction over border security, Abbott argues that states have a constitutional right to defend themselves against an invasion, which is how he and his supporters see recent record-high levels of undocumented immigration.

A state bill allowing Texas to detain and deport migrants back to Mexico is set to take effect in March, although the Justice Department and ACLU have both filed injunctions. The legal battles will continue, right as immigration takes center stage in the 2024 presidential race. But if Texas doesn’t back down in the face of federal and Supreme Court rulings, a deeper constitutional crisis could arise.

More For You

- YouTube

In his latest Quick Take, Ian Bremmer argues that the war between the United States and Iran has entered a more dangerous phase, with both sides demonstrating they can sustain military and economic pressure without forcing the other to back down. The question is, will this standoff bring them back to the table before the conflict escalates further?

- YouTube

For years, Russia has counted on one advantage above all else: time. Ian Bremmer explains why Ukraine's expanding campaign inside Russia is challenging that assumption, and what it could mean for the future of the war.

US President Donald Trump speaks about election security during an address to the nation from the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., US, July 16, 2026
SAUL LOEB/Pool via REUTERS

The US president used a primetime address last night to argue America’s election system is broken and vulnerable to “rigging.” He pointed to documents he says show Chinese interference in the 2020 vote. But the evidence Trump offered, along with past assessments from the intelligence community, doesn’t support his broadest claims.