Russian ruble weathers sanctions storm

Russian ruble weathers sanctions storm
Packs of 1,000-ruble notes at a printing factory in Moscow.
REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov

Having plunged to a record low against the US dollar in early March, the ruble has since recovered most of its losses. Does this mean sanctions can’t impact the Russian economy as much as the West hoped? We asked Eurasia Group senior analyst Jason Bush for his take on the strength of Russia’s economy amid the war and the Western backlash.

The ruble recently recovered its sanctions-related losses: how?

The sanctions have done relatively little to impact Russia’s large earnings from energy exports, where prices have soared. Normally, such sky-high commodity prices would strongly support the ruble, and at present, they are helping offset the negative impact of sanctions.

We see this in Russia’s balance of payments data. Although there was a huge $64 billion outflow of capital in the first quarter — showing both foreign investors and ordinary Russians rushing to dump the ruble and buy foreign currency — this was compensated by an almost equally massive $58 billion surplus in Russia’s net foreign earnings (the current account surplus). This unusually large surplus is being powered by energy exports, which are expected to be worth more than $300 billion this year.

There are other factors, too. The Russian central bank has introduced tight capital controls, forcing companies to convert 80% of their export earnings into rubles and also limiting how much cash Russians can transfer abroad. The bank has also jacked up interest rates (the official central bank rate is 17%) to encourage depositors to keep their money in rubles.

It has also stopped accumulating foreign exchange reserves, which means that billions of dollars and euros that would normally be saved abroad by the central bank each month are instead flooding onto the forex market, meeting Russians’ heightened demand for foreign currency and therefore supporting the ruble.

What does this ruble level tell us about how well Russia is weathering sanctions?

A stable currency brings some economic benefits to Russia. For one thing, it reduces the risks of a banking crisis in which depositors rush to take their rubles out of Russian banks. It also means inflation will be lower than would be the case if the ruble plunged more seriously. However, the ruble’s resilience does not mean that Russia’s economy is shrugging off the sanctions. Even Russian officials now predict the economy will shrink by 10% this year, and some economists think the slump will be even worse.

One point to remember is that the central bank has been forced to take drastic steps, such as jacking up interest rates, which imposes major costs on the economy even if these measures succeed in stabilizing the currency. Another point is that, although the impact of sanctions on the ruble has been relatively weak so far, this impact will probably strengthen over time. The sanctions are clearly very negative for investment in Russia, and eventually, they can be expected to have a bigger negative impact on trade than has been apparent so far.

Western governments have talked about sanctioning more Russian energy exports. How much would that change things?

As Russia’s huge earnings from energy exports have been crucial in supporting the ruble, and more generally the Russian economy, it follows that meaningful steps to curtail these exports would be the most effective way for the West to increase the economic pressure.

The snag is that dependence cuts both ways. Western countries and particularly European ones are reluctant to ban Russian energy imports as this would risk severe energy shortages at home and an economic recession. This makes a full embargo impractical for the time being. Nevertheless, the West looks likely over time to increase sanctions on energy imports from Russia and more generally cut its dependence on Russian oil and gas.

How does all of the above affect Putin's political standing and choices at home?

So far there is not in fact much evidence that the Russian public is turning against Putin. His approval rating has in fact risen to over 80%, which no doubt reflects a patriotic rally-round-the-flag effect. Still, it will be interesting to watch whether this support holds up once the sanctions begin to bite into the incomes of ordinary Russians — as they undoubtedly will if the economy shrinks by 10% as expected.

Although most Russians probably do not care that much about the value of the ruble on foreign exchange markets, they do care about inflation, which will be a consequence if the ruble resumes its decline. Higher inflation is also being driven by other factors besides a weaker currency, such as disruptions to imports caused by trade sanctions or foreign companies pulling out.

So Putin has reasons to worry that the public mood could eventually sour and his popularity fall. So far, though, there is little sign this is influencing his decisions over the war.

How might all of this affect the war itself?

In terms of Russia’s economic capacity to continue the war, sanctions still seem a long way away from having a decisive impact. Russia’s continued huge export earnings mean the government is not short of money to fund the war. Continued financial stability and the seemingly high public support for Putin also mean he has no immediate incentive to change course.

Nevertheless, Putin may also be aware that as the economic costs mount, his public support could prove fragile. Arguably, this may push him towards a relatively rapid conclusion of the war. But so far, there is still not much tangible evidence that sanctions and economic difficulties are strongly influencing Putin’s military decisions.

More from GZERO Media

A 3D-printed miniature model depicting US President Donald Trump, the Chinese flag, and the word "tariffs" in this illustration taken on April 17, 2025.

REUTERS/Dado Ruvic

The US economy contracted 0.3% at an annualized rate in the first quarter of 2025, while China’s manufacturing plants saw their sharpest monthly slowdown in over a year. Behind the scenes, the world’s two largest economies are backing away from their extraordinary trade war.

A photovoltaic power station with a capacity of 0.8 MW covers an area of more than 3,000 square metres at the industrial site of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, Kyiv region, Ukraine, on April 12, 2025.
Volodymyr Tarasov/Ukrinform/ABACAPRESS.COM

Two months after their infamous White House fight, the US and Ukraine announced on Wednesday that they had finally struck a long-awaited minerals deal.

Indian paramilitary soldiers patrol along a road in Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, on April 29, 2025.
Firdous Nazir via Reuters Connect

Nerves are fraught throughout Pakistan after authorities said Wednesday they have “credible intelligence” that India plans to launch military strikes on its soil by Friday.

Palestinian Hamas and Islamic Jihad fighters form a human chain in front of the crowd gathered near the family home of slain Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, where the Hamas militant group prepares to hand over Israeli and Thai hostages to a Red Cross team in Khan Yunis, on January 30, 2025, as part of their third hostage-prisoner exchange..
Photo by Majdi Fathi/NurPhot

Israel hunted Yahya Sinwar — the Hamas leader and mastermind of the Oct. 7 attack — for over a year. He was hidden deep within Gaza’s shadowy tunnel networks.

A gunman stands as Syrian security forces check vehicles entering Druze town of Jaramana, following deadly clashes sparked by a purported recording of a Druze man cursing the Prophet Mohammad which angered Sunni gunmen, as rescuers and security sources say, in southeast of Damascus, Syria April 29, 2025.
REUTERS/Yamam Al Shaar

Israel said the deadly drone strike was carried out on behalf of Syria's Druze community.

Britain's King Charles holds an audience with the Prime Minister of Canada Mark Carney at Buckingham Palace, on March 17, 2025.

Aaron Chown/Pool via REUTERS

King Charles is rumored to have been invited to Canada to deliver the speech from the throne, likely in late May, although whether he attends may depend on sensitivities in the office of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Getting access to energy, whether it's renewables, oil and gas, or other sources, is increasingly challenging because of long lead times to get things built in the US and elsewhere, says Greg Ebel, Enbridge's CEO, on the latest "Energized: The Future of Energy" podcast episode. And it's not just problems with access. “There is an energy emergency, if we're not careful, when it comes to price,” says Ebel. “There's definitely an energy emergency when it comes to having a resilient grid, whether it's a pipeline grid, an electric grid. That's something I think people have to take seriously.” Ebel believes that finding "the intersection of rhetoric, policy, and capital" can lead to affordability and profitability for the energy transition. His discussion with host JJ Ramberg and Arjun Murti, founder of the energy transition newsletter Super-Spiked, addresses where North America stands in the global energy transition, the implication of the revised energy policies by President Trump, and the potential consequences of tariffs and trade tension on the energy sector. “Energized: The Future of Energy” is a podcast series produced by GZERO Media's Blue Circle Studios in partnership with Enbridge. Listen to this episode at gzeromedia.com/energized, or on Apple, Spotify,Goodpods, or wherever you get your podcasts.