What We're Watching: Flames go up in Russia, UN-Russia summit, Kim Jong-un's parade

Flames go up in Russia, UN-Russia summit, Kim Jong-un's parade
Plumes of smoke rise after a fire erupts at an oil depot in Bryansk, Russia.
REUTERS

Flaming coincidences in Russia

Fires, explosions, train derailments, dead executives — there’s a lot of weird stuff happening in Russia lately. Earlier this week, two major oil depots went up in flames in the city of Bryansk, a major support hub for Russian forces just a few hours north of the Ukrainian border by car. Russia says it’s investigating, but top military analysts say the blaze looks like the result of sabotage or an attack by Ukraine. Just three days earlier, a locomotive derailed while traveling along a nearby stretch of rail used to supply the Russian army. That, meanwhile, happened on the same day that fires erupted at a major defense research institute and a chemical plant, both within 100 miles of Moscow. The research institute blaze, which was blamed on faulty wiring, claimed half a dozen lives. Fires in Russia’s poorly maintained Soviet-era buildings aren’t uncommon, but the chattering has begun: were these Ukrainian operations? Sabotage by disgruntled employees? False flag “attacks” staged to rally opinion against Ukraine? We’re watching to see if the trend continues. Meanwhile, another oddity: Russian executives turning up dead in apparent murder-suicides with their families. That fate recently befell former executives from energy giant Gazprombank and Novatek, Russia’s largest independent gas producer. Their deaths are among a number of high-profile oligarch deaths in recent weeks.

Russian rhetoric goes nuclear

Vladimir Putin met on Tuesday with UN Secretary General António Guterres at his famously long table in the Kremlin. Guterres was perhaps hoping that giving Putin an air of legitimacy as an international statesman might improve his chances of pulling some concessions from Moscow. Instead, the Kremlin doubled down on its escalatory rhetoric, saying that prospects for peace talks with Kyiv were “dismal.” Meanwhile, as fears rose that the conflict could spread beyond Ukraine's borders, the Kremlin announced Wednesday that it would cut off natural gas exports to Bulgaria and Poland. Greece, for its part, vowed to help Sofia make up the shortfall, while Warsaw has been bulking up its stockpiles in anticipation of a Russian suspension. This comes after Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov created a frenzy by saying that as the crisis deepens – and the West continues to provide Ukraine with heavy artillery – the risk of a nuclear conflict is “quite considerable.” Would use of a nuclear missile in Ukraine be a clear “red line” for the White House and its European partners, prompting a fierce military response? While Biden has talked tough in recent weeks, he hasn’t laid out what the US would do if Putin went nuclear. In 2013, President Barack Obama vowed to intervene in Syria if the Assad regime – backed by Putin – crossed a “red line” by using chemical weapons, and we all know how that turned out.

Kim Jong-un parades nuclear intentions

At a military parade this week, North Korea’s despot Kim Jong-un pledged again to boost his country’s nuclear arsenal. Speaking from a balcony clad in a regal white suit with gold trappings, the supreme leader said nuclear weapons primarily serve as a deterrent but warned they would be deployed if Pyongyang’s strategic interests were “threatened.” Since inheriting the reins of the Hermit Kingdom a decade ago, Kim has been a fan of over-the-top military parades, using them to flex his military might and threaten the West. This latest display comes weeks after North Korea tested intercontinental ballistic missiles for the first time in five years, an attempt to gain Washington’s attention, which has largely ignored Pyongyang since President Biden took office. With the world focused almost exclusively on Ukraine, Kim’s tirade was likely another attempt to lob his own warning shots, both for attention and to look tough for people tuning in at home.

More from GZERO Media

- YouTube

"We are seeing adversaries act in increasingly sophisticated ways, at a speed and scale often fueled by AI in a way that I haven't seen before.” says Lisa Monaco, President of Global Affairs at Microsoft.

US President Donald Trump has been piling the pressure on Russia and Venezuela in recent weeks. He placed sanctions on Russia’s two largest oil firms and bolstered the country’s military presence around Venezuela – while continuing to bomb ships coming off Venezuela’s shores. But what exactly are Trump’s goals? And can he achieve them? And how are Russia and Venezuela, two of the largest oil producers in the world, responding? GZERO reporters Zac Weisz and Riley Callanan discuss.

- YouTube

Former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says AI can be both a force for good and a tool for harm. “AI has either the possibility of…providing interventions and disruption, or it has the ability to also further harms, increase radicalization, and exacerbate issues of terrorism and extremism online.”

Demonstrators carry the dead body of a man killed during a protest a day after a general election marred by violent demonstrations over the exclusion of two leading opposition candidates at the Namanga One-Post Border crossing point between Kenya and Tanzania, as seen from Namanga, Kenya October 30, 2025.
REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya

Tanzania has been rocked by violence for three days now, following a national election earlier this week. Protestors are angry over the banning of candidates and detention of opposition leaders by President Samia Suluhu Hassan.

Illegal immigrants from Ethiopia walk on a road near the town of Taojourah February 23, 2015. The area, described by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) as one of the most inhospitable areas in the world, is on a transit route for thousands of immigrants every year from Ethiopia, Eritrea and Somalia travelling via Yemen to Saudi Arabia in hope of work. Picture taken February 23.
REUTERS/Goran Tomasevic

7,500: The Trump administration will cap the number of refugees that the US will admit over the next year to 7,500. The previous limit, set by former President Joe Biden, was 125,000. The new cap is a record low. White South Africans will have priority access.