Blinken-Xi talks deliver mixed results

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets Chinese President Xi Jinping in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing.
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets Chinese President Xi Jinping in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing.
REUTERS/Leah Millis

While there was no major breakthrough from US Secretary of State Antony Blinken's much-anticipated meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Beijing on Monday, how it went depends on how you view the immediate future of fraught US-China ties.

If you see the glass half-full, the mutual vibes were a tad less frosty than in February, when they hit rock-bottom after Blinken postponed his trip over balloon-gate. Xi admitting some progress was made is the strongest sign to date that he's willing to call a time-out before things spiral out of control over things like economic decoupling, Taiwan, trade, or Russia's war in Ukraine.

But if you see the glass half-empty, the expectations were so low that just talking again might be as good as it gets. Indeed, the pleasantries won’t move the two sides anywhere near repairing their strained relations, and Blinken’s call to resume military-to-military comms in order avoid further close calls in the South China Sea and near Taiwan fell on deaf Chinese ears (Beijing blames the radio silence on US sanctions against China’s military).

What’s more, the most senior US visit to China since 2018 did not immediately produce a long-sought invitation for Xi to meet Biden at November's APEC summit in San Francisco.

If you just see a glass with some water in it, the meeting was just ... a meeting. And whether the two are on a path toward easing US-China tensions depends on whether the high-level diplomacy momentum continues.

More from GZERO Media

When Walmart stocks its shelves with homegrown products like Fischer & Wieser’s peach jam, it’s not just selling food — it’s creating opportunity. Over two-thirds of what Walmart buys is made, grown, or assembled in America, fueling jobs and growth in communities nationwide. Walmart’s $350 billion commitment to US manufacturing is supporting 750,000 jobs and empowering small businesses to sell more, hire more, and strengthen their hometowns. From farms to shelves, Walmart’s investment keeps local businesses thriving. Learn how Walmart's commitment to US manufacturing is supporting 750K American jobs.

Earlier this month, Microsoft released the 2025 TechSpark Impact Report, which highlights how the company is assisting regions across the US in achieving these goals. Since its launch, TechSpark has obtained over $700 million in community funding, supported more than 65,000 people in developing digital skills, and, thanks to the work of TechSpark Fellows, catalyzed $249M+ in funding and upskilled 34,600 individuals across 46 communities — highlighting the ripple effect of local leadership and innovation. Learn more about this progress in the 2025 report here.

People walk past a jewelry store in the Diamond District of Manhattan, New York City, USA, on August 6, 2025.
Jimin Kim / SOPA Images via Reuters Connect

GZERO spoke to Eurasia Group’s Commodities Director Tim Puko to better understand why the diamond industry has tanked, and the consequences of this for geopolitics.

- YouTube

In Ask Ian, Ian Bremmer notes that US–China relations are once again on edge. After Washington expanded export controls on Chinese tech firms, Beijing struck back with new limits on critical minerals. President Trump responded by threatening 100% tariffs, then quickly walked them back.

In this episode of The Ripple Effect: Investing in Life Sciences, host Dan Riskin speaks with Patrick Horber, President of Novartis International, and David Gluckman, Vice Chairman of Investment Banking and Global Head of Healthcare at Lazard. Together, they break down the outsized economic impact of life science innovation, from trillions in US bioscience output to China’s meteoric rise as a global R&D hub.

RPG-7 training of Ukrainian soldiers. November 17, 2024.
  • Adrien Vautier via Reuters Connect

People from different cultures often approach the same problem in different ways. We wondered — would an AI trained and tuned in China approach a complex geopolitical challenge differently than a model created and trained in Europe, or in the United States?