Economy
Big change to small print: US bans noncompete clauses
The Federal Trade Commission building is seen in Washington on March 4, 2012.
REUTERS/Gary Cameron
Looking for another job at a firm that does something similar to what you do now? Now could be your chance to jump ship.
The US Federal Trade Commission, the country’s top competition regulator, voted Tuesday to ban noncompete clauses.
What are those? They’re small-print stipulations in employment contracts that forbid you from working for a competitor or starting your own business, typically for a certain period of time after you leave your current job.
Supporters of noncompete clauses say they prevent intellectual property theft and bolster employers’ incentives to invest in their workforces.
But opponents say they stifle new business formation and suppress innovation, trapping employees in jobs regulated by clauses that they are rarely given a chance to negotiate directly.
Several US states, including California (AKA the world’s fifth-largest economy), have all-but-banned noncompetes for years. The FTC ruling brings that nationwide.
Competition could bring benefits. The FTC says banning noncompetes will create more than 8,000 new businesses annually, boost average wages by more than $500 per year, and lower health care costs by nearly $200 billion over the next decade. It’s hard to compete with that!
In this episode of “ask ian,” Ian Bremmer breaks down Europe’s political turmoil, from leadership crises in the UK and France to growing anti-establishment sentiment across the continent.
After less than two years in office, centrist Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on Monday morning that he would resign as Labour Party leader.
The two countries remain allies against Russia, but the rift could complicate efforts to rebuff Moscow.
Inflation, war, climate change, and now artificial intelligence are among the world’s top concerns, according to a poll of 15 countries.