Publishers are cashing in on AI

OpenAI logo displayed on a phone screen and binary code displayed on a laptop screen are seen in this illustration photo taken in Krakow, Poland on December 5, 2022.
OpenAI logo displayed on a phone screen and binary code displayed on a laptop screen are seen in this illustration photo taken in Krakow, Poland on December 5, 2022.
Jakub Porzycki/Reuters

OpenAI is striking lucrative deals with major news publishers to license their content for their AI models. On May 29, OpenAI announcedthat it struck deals with The Atlantic and Vox Media one week after it inked a similar agreement with Wall Street Journal publisher News Corp. While the News Corp. deal was reportedly worth $250 million over five years, figures for the new deals haven’t yet been reported.

There’s currently a split in the news world over how to deal with tech companies that want news content to train their models and deliver reliable, up-to-date information for users. The New York Times has taken a different approach and is suing OpenAI for copyright violations, as have several newspapers owned by Alden Global Capital.

Journalists have also pushed back against coziness with AI firms. Jessica Lessin, founder of the news site The Information, wrote an op-ed in The Atlantic just days before the deal was announced, saying that news companies are making a “huge mistake” by “absolving AI companies of theft.”

The Atlantic’s tech editor, Damon Beres, called it a “devil’s bargain” in writing about his employer. “Generative AI has not exactly felt like a friend to the news industry, given that it is trained on loads of material without permission from those who made it in the first place,” Beres wrote, likening these deals to the ones made with Facebook and other social media companies a decade ago — only for them to change their mind and pivot away from news.

Vox’s Editorial Director Bryan Walsh also wrote critically about his employer: “I’ve seen our industry pin our hopes on search engine optimization; on the pivot to video (and back again); on Facebook and social media traffic,” he wrote. “But sure — maybe this time Lucy won’t pull the football away.”

More from GZERO Media

US President Donald Trump is joined by Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and Vice President JD Vance while announcing a trade agreement with the United Kingdom in the Oval Office on May 8, 2025.
Emily J. Higgins/White House/ZUMA Press Wire

On Wednesday evening, the US Court of International Trade ruled that President Donald Trump could not impose his “reciprocal” tariffs. GZERO spoke to Eurasia Group’s top analysts to assess what could happen next.

A portrait of former US President Ronald Reagan hangs behind US President Donald Trump as he answers questions from members of the news media in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., USA, on May 28, 2025.
REUTERS/Leah Millis

Donald Trump’s tariff gamesmanship ran into a legal brick wall on Wednesday when the Court of International Trade ruled that he did not have the authority to impose sweeping “Liberation Day” import duties.