News
US chokes off investment in Chinese tech sectors
Biden holds a microchip to discuss the strategic importance of semiconductors.
Reuters
In a move that deepens the breach between the world’s two largest economies, the Biden administration this week authorized the Treasury Department to prohibit US firms from investing in several cutting-edge technology industries in China.
The order aims to stop American capital from financing Chinese research into quantum computing and advanced semiconductors and places fresh restrictions on investment in Chinese AI or other semiconductor technology industries.
Amid a deepening rivalry with China to achieve mastery over these technologies, Washington has framed the latest measure as a way to protect US national security.
One big question is: Will US allies do the same thing? Powerful as the US is, a strategy to crimp Beijing’s technological progress doesn’t work half as well if China can look elsewhere for high
quality investment.
It looks like things are moving that way. UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said Thursday he was considering a similar move, and the EU has been mulling measures of this kind since at least April when European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen suggested measures to curb European private sector investment in “sensitive technologies” in China.
And recall that after the US banned its companies from exporting sensitive technology to the Chinese semiconductor industry last year, both Japan and the Netherlands — major suppliers to China — quickly followed suit.
Is “decoupling” of this kind a good idea? If the US and EU are worried about China making critical breakthroughs then it makes sense not to help China do that. On the other hand, critics say that cutting the industries off from each other makes it harder for each side to monitor the other’s progress and to collaborate on guardrails for potentially destructive new technologies.
Tell us what you think. Is “decoupling” smart or shortsighted?
Is China’s economic model reaching a breaking point? In GZERO’s 2026 Top Risks livestream, Cliff Kupchan, Chairman of Global Macro at Eurasia Group, highlights mounting pressures on the Chinese economy.
2026 is a tipping point year. The biggest source of global instability won’t be China, Russia, Iran, or the ~60 conflicts burning across the planet – the most since World War II. It will be the United States.
While surgeons remain fully in control, technological advances are expanding the use of surgical robots in operating rooms. As adoption accelerates, so do the expectations for patient outcomes and surgical care. Track medical innovation trends with Bank of America Institute.
Europe enters 2026 under mounting strain as it confronts external threats, internal political pressures, and a weakening relationship with the United States. In GZERO’s 2026 Top Risks livestream, Mujtaba Rahman, Managing Director for Europe at Eurasia Group, describes a continent that is “exhausted, fatigued, weak, and vulnerable.”