Canada mulls AIIB withdrawal

Flags of China and Canada are displayed next to the logo of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.
Flags of China and Canada are displayed next to the logo of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.
REUTERS/Florence Lo/Illustration

While Secretary of State Anthony Blinken’s been busy trying to stabilize US-China relations, Canada has temporarily frozen its relationship with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, citing possible infiltration from the Chinese Communist Party. The allegations, which China denied, came from the bank’s former global head of communications, Bob Pickard.

What is the AIIB? It’s a sometimes-rival, sometimes-partner of the Asian Development Bank with a pledged capitalization of nearly US$100 billion (a third comes from China; roughly $1 billion comes from Canada). It has over 100 members, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. But the US — which controls the ABD along with Japan — opted not to join in 2015 under pressure from Congress and over concerns about China’s geopolitical goals. The Obama administration, seeing the AIIB as a regional rival, also tried but failed to keep its allies from joining.

Canada is investigating Pickard’s claims that the CCP infiltrated the bank – an allegation that seems obviously true and consistent with the practice of mega-world powers dominating multilateral institutions. Politically, Trudeau’s government has to react to the allegations – after all, this is playing out amid a Canadian public inquiry into alleged election interference by China.

But in a world increasingly marked by realpolitik, Ottawa also has to leave room for all sides to save face. Canada has no interest in falling too far out of step with the US-China relationship, and with Blinken’s ongoing efforts to stabilize relations with Beijing, Canada can’t alienate itself from China.

This is why, despite the freeze, Canada’s ambassador to Beijing is insisting that Canada and China are not adversaries … and why we don’t expect much to come from the AIIB investigation.

More from GZERO Media

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) talks to reporters after surviving a vote to remove him from the Speaker’s position, Washington, DC, May 8, 2024. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) introduced a motion to vacate the Speaker’s office, which was defeated by a motion to table the issue immediately afterward.
Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via Reuters
FILE PHOTO: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks with Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich during the weekly cabinet meeting at the Defence Ministry in Tel Aviv, Israel, January 7, 2024.
REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun/Pool/File Photo

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday his country would “stand alone” and fight “with its fingernails” if Joe Biden followed through on a threat to cut certain arms shipments to the Jewish state.

An Israeli delegation reacts to their advancing the ESC finale during the second semi-final of the 2024 Eurovision Song Contest, in Malmo, Sweden, May 9, 2024.
REUTERS/Leonhard Foeger

As musicians from around the world prepare to represent their country in the Eurovision Song Contest, thousands of demonstrators waving Palestinian flags are flooding the host city of Malmö, Sweden, to protest Israel’s participation.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaking at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol.
(Photo by Michael Brochstein/Sipa USA)

Earlier this week, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) faced down a would-be Republican rebellion against his leadership driven by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) – and he did it emphatically.

Jess Frampton

In an exclusive investigation into online disinformation surrounding the reaction to Donald Trump’s hush-money trial, GZERO asks whether bots are being employed to shape debates about the former president’s guilt or innocence. We investigated, with the help of Cyabra, a firm that specializes in tracking bots, to look for disinformation surrounding the online reactions to Trump’s trial. Is Trump’s trial the target of a massive online propaganda campaign – and, if so, which side is to blame?

Luisa Vieira

The US and Canada are both racing against the clock to lower their greenhouse gas emissions. As the effects of climate change become more apparent and deadly, countries are grappling with how to curb their emissions without curbing economic growth.