Nike Canada, Dynasty Gold face ethics probe

Activists take part in a protest against China's treatment of the ethnic Uyghur people in Jakarta, Indonesia.
Activists take part in a protest against China's treatment of the ethnic Uyghur people in Jakarta, Indonesia.
REUTERS/Willy Kurniawan

Canada's corporate ethics watchdog is looking into whether the local affiliate of US sportswear giant Nike and Dynasty Gold, a Canadian mining firm, benefited from using ethnic Uighur forced labor in China.

This might not sound like a big deal because the Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise only has investigative powers and can recommend prosecution. Dynasty Gold called the allegations “totally unfounded,” and Nike argued that the complaint has "factual inaccuracies."

Still, the probe might have two geopolitical ramifications.

First, it happens amid a rather icy phase in Canada-China ties. Beijing will not be happy with Ottawa about the investigation — although the Chinese are used to playing defense over their treatment of Uighurs, which most Western governments say are often "employed" as modern-day slaves by the ruling Communist Party.

Second, the proceedings will be closely watched in the US, where in late 2020 Nike was among a handful of big companies that lobbied against Congress passing the Uighur Forced Labor Prevention Act. The bill, signed into law in December 2021 by President Joe Biden, bans the import of goods when there is "reasonable evidence" they were produced with Uighur forced labor in China's northwestern Xinjiang region.

So far, US customs authorities have only seized some Chinese imports under the new law. But if the Canadian complaint eventually yields sufficient proof, the Biden administration might face bipartisan pressure to do more to enforce the law right when Biden wants to lower the temperature with Beijing.

More from GZERO Media

- YouTube

The next leap in artificial intelligence is physical. On Ian Explains, Ian Bremmer breaks down how robots and autonomous machines will transform daily life, if we can manage the risks that come with them.

Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer is flanked by Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof as he hosts a 'Coalition of the Willing' meeting of international partners on Ukraine at the Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office (FCDO) in London, Britain, October 24, 2025.
Henry Nicholls/Pool via REUTERS

As we race toward the end of 2025, voters in over a dozen countries will head to the polls for elections that have major implications for their populations and political movements globally.

The biggest story of our G-Zero world, Ian Bremmer explains, is that the United States – still the world’s most powerful nation – has chosen to walk away from the international system it built and led for three-quarters of a century. Not because it's weak. Not because it has to. But because it wants to.