What does Alabama’s embryo ruling have to do with Canada?

Press conference on the Alabama Supreme Court Ruling on IVF, and the need to safeguard IVF access nationwide, at the US Capitol in Washington, DC.
Press conference on the Alabama Supreme Court Ruling on IVF, and the need to safeguard IVF access nationwide, at the US Capitol in Washington, DC.
Rod Lamkey/REUTERS

Barely a week after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos are “extrauterine children,” putting the future of in vitro fertilization (IVF) at risk throughout the state and, potentially, other parts of the nation, there are concerns the decision’s effects will creep north into Canada.

This week, the Alabama State Senate and House introduced bills moved to protect IVF providers as the state faced immediate backlash for the ruling. The court decision was a major win for anti-choice activists, which also has Canadians worried.

Under Canadian law, embryos are not considered persons — and that’s unlikely to change. But many Canadians seek IVF treatment in the US, which means stateside rulings could affect them. Plus, the transnational anti-choice movement — including its Canadian members — will be emboldened by the outcome.

While abortion in Canada is legal nationwide, access is limited by geographical barriers and a lack of clinics in some regions of the country, particularly Atlantic Canada. In the US, where a majority of Americans support abortion, lawmakers are proposing and passing abortion bans in states throughout the country in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. But pro-choice supporters are also fighting back.

On Wednesday, Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworthtried to pass a quick bill to protect IVF throughout the country, but was blocked by Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith. The setback notwithstanding, the federal effort to secure fertility treatment rights won’t end there.

More from GZERO Media

A portrait of former US President Ronald Reagan hangs behind US President Donald Trump as he answers questions from members of the news media in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., USA, on May 28, 2025.
REUTERS/Leah Millis

Donald Trump’s tariff gamesmanship ran into a legal brick wall on Wednesday when the Court of International Trade ruled that he did not have the authority to impose sweeping “Liberation Day” import duties.

US President Donald Trump talks to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a meeting where Trump announced nuclear talks with Iran, in Washington, D.C., USA, on April 7, 2025.
REUTERS/Kevin Mohatt

The US president is keen for a deal with Iran, whereas his Israeli counterpart wants to strike the proverbial iron while it’s hot.