News
Altman to Congress: Regulate me, please.
A painting of Biggie Smalls being chauffeured across the Brooklyn Bridge in a lime green limousine driven by a capybara, in the style of Van Gogh?
Dall-E and the human Alex Kilment
It’s rare for the head of a cutting-edge tech firm to ask for more regulation, but that’s precisely what happened Tuesday when Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, appeared before Congress to talk about the powers and risks of artificial intelligence.
In the months since OpenAI released its ChatGPT module late last year, attention to AI’s possibilities — utopian, dystopian, and ridiculous — has ballooned. Who among us has not already created “a painting of Biggie Smalls being chauffeured across the Brooklyn Bridge in a lime green limousine driven by a capybara, in the style of Van Gogh”?
But the serious concerns fall into a few categories: AI causing potentially vast net job losses, or learning and then replicating harmful human biases, or being used to generate “Deep Fakes” so convincing that, as one disillusioned AI pioneer has warned, “no one will know what is true anymore.”
Altman, who said he fears AI could cause “significant harm,” suggested a government agency tasked with licensing large AI platforms and holding them to certain standards. Lawmakers say they are interested in regulating AI early – by contrast with social media, which became a jungle before Congress could grab a machete. But progress will be slow as they try to strike that delicate balance: preventing the worst harms without stifling the best innovations.
Gabriel Perez, who has worked for the president since 2016, is under fire for his prediction market wagers, allegedly using his access to the speeches to make his bets
Think you know what's going on around the world? Here's your chance to prove it.
More than half of Americans believe their job is vulnerable to AI. The data tells a more complicated and in some ways more hopeful story.
In this episode of GZERO Europe, Carl Bildt reflects on the NATO summit in Ankara and why Europe is treating the outcome as a success mainly because it avoided open controversy.