At the start of the Revolutionary War, slaves made up 20 percent of the population in British North America. They later built iconic buildings of US democracy like the Capitol and the White House in Washington.
But what if slavery was more than just America’s original sin? What if the institution of slavery itself was foundational to modern America?
That's what Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones defends — in very simple terms — in the 1619 Project. This sprawling collection of essays, short stories, and poetry published in 2019 argues that American history begins not in 1776 with the Declaration of Independence but rather 157 years earlier, when the first slave ship arrived in the British colonies on the other side of the Atlantic.
The 1619 Project landed like a cultural atom bomb. And soon later, the formerly obscure academic field known as “critical race theory” or CRT took center stage at conservative rallies and school board meetings.
What's the relationship, if any, between the two? Ian Bremmer explains.
- Nikole Hannah-Jones pushes back against "disqualifying" 1619 ... ›
- Podcast: How we got here: Evaluating 1619 and US history with ... ›
- The Graphic Truth: Did COVID spur political division? - GZERO Media ›
- The history of Black voting rights in America - GZERO Media ›
- No second-class citizens: the challenge of diversity in democracy - GZERO Media ›
- Critical race theory and Black voting rights - GZERO Media ›