Republican showdown over Ukraine

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.
Graeme Sloan/Reuters

Kyiv is likely on tenterhooks after House Speaker Kevin McCarthy on Tuesday rebuffed the prospect of Congress passing a supplemental funding bill for Ukraine, saying that such a proposal “isn’t going anywhere.”

This is a big deal for two reasons. First, it is an obvious blow for Kyiv, which has become reliant on US economic and military aid – Washington has doled out $110 billion since the war started. The timing is also less-than-ideal considering that Kyiv has just gotten its much-anticipated counteroffensive off the ground.

It also highlights the deepening ideological rift within the Republican Party that has proven to obstruct legislating efforts, a turnoff for voters.

As part of last week’s debt ceiling bill to avoid the US defaulting on its debt, House Republicans capped defense spending at $886 billion for the next fiscal year. And in order to get that bill through the upper chamber, Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell assured defense hawks in his caucus – who argue that the Pentagon needs a bigger budget – that Congress would pass an additional Ukraine aid bill. But now McCarthy is saying that’s a no-go and that any future aid to Ukraine should be drawn from the Pentagon’s allocated funds.

Meanwhile, several hawkish Republicans – like Senator Lindsey Graham – say they will fight it out until they get what they want. Taking aim directly at McCarthy, Graham said Tuesday that “the speaker will never convince me that 2% below actual inflation is fully funding the Defense Department … That cannot be the position of the Republican Party without some contest.”

Yet again, the stakes are sky-high for the embattled McCarthy, who has personally backed additional aid to Ukraine but is navigating a vocal anti-Ukraine faction within his caucus that will seethe – and potentially punish the speaker – if he goes back on his word.

More from GZERO Media

On the 80th anniversary of the United Nations, our panel of global experts will discuss the future of global cooperation and governance in the age of AI. Our livestream panel discussion, "Global Stage: Live from the 80th UN General Assembly" will examine these key issues on Tuesday, September 23 at 11:30 AM ET, live from the sidelines of UN headquarters on the first day of high-level General Debate. Watch live at gzeromedia.com/globalstage

Last Thursday, Brazil’s Supreme Court delivered a historic verdict: Jair Bolsonaro, the far-right former president who tried to overturn the 2022 election, was convicted along with seven close allies for conspiring against democracy and plotting to assassinate his rivals, including President Lula. Bolsonaro was sentenced to 27 years in prison and barred from office until 2060. At 70, he will likely spend his remaining years behind bars.
Last Thursday, Brazil’s Supreme Court delivered a historic verdict: Jair Bolsonaro, the far-right former president who tried to overturn the 2022 election.

Last Thursday, Brazil’s Supreme Court delivered a historic verdict: Jair Bolsonaro, the far-right former president who tried to overturn the 2022 election.

This summer, Microsoft released the 2025 Responsible AI Transparency Report, demonstrating Microsoft’s sustained commitment to earning trust at a pace that matches AI innovation. The report outlines new developments in how we build and deploy AI systems responsibly, how we support our customers, and how we learn, evolve, and grow. It highlights our strengthened incident response processes, enhanced risk assessments and mitigations, and proactive regulatory alignment. It also covers new tools and practices we offer our customers to support their AI risk governance efforts, as well as how we work with stakeholders around the world to work towards governance approaches that build trust. You can read the report here.

- YouTube

Brazil’s Supreme Court has sentenced former President Jair Bolsonaro to 27 years in prison for plotting to overturn the 2022 election and allegedly conspiring to assassinate President Lula. In this week's "ask ian," Ian Bremmer says the verdict highlights how “your response… has nothing to do with rule of law. It has everything to do with tribal political affiliation.”