The US and India: 2+2 To Tango?

In the most important geopolitical region in the world, the Asia Pacific, the Trump administration has its bets placed squarely on India. Its strategy, which includes a rebrand befitting a salesman turned president, depends on closer relations between the US and India and India playing a larger role throughout Asia.

So as US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis arrive in New Delhi tomorrow for the 2+2 dialogue (so-called because it involves foreign ministers and defense secretaries from each side), one of the highest-level dialogues between the two countries since Trump took office, it bears asking – How are things going?

On many fronts, relations between the US and India are on an upward trajectory. Perhaps the strongest area of cooperation is on arms sales—where India went from importing zero US-made equipment in 2008 to around $15 billion in the decade since. Secretaries Pompeo and Mattis are looking to use their trip this week to sign a long-stalled defense pact that would enable billions more in weapons deals and expand military ties, including the sharing of encrypted communications and communications systems. The recent US decision to cut off military aid to Pakistan should certainly help boost trust.

But there remain points of friction, particularly on economic issues, that could ultimately limit the deeper cooperation envisioned by US strategy. India has a large trade surplus with the US, a particular bone of contention for President Trump, and was hit by US steel and aluminum tariffs earlier in the year—which though not yet economically damaging have proven to be an irritant. In addition, the US is currently considering two different sanctions packages against India—one for its planned purchase of a Russian-made air defense system, the other because of its continued reliance on Iranian oil imports. Trump’s tendency to mimic his Indian counterpart, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, is certainly not helping his administration’s efforts to cozy up to a man who oversees one-sixth of the world’s population.

Even if they can get along, there’s a broader question: Could India ever provide the US the reliable foothold it wants in Asia? Here, the US faces two problems. First, India remains a reluctant power that will struggle to challenge China strategically in the region. Second, deeper ties with India will do little to combat China’s growing economic clout—of which India is, and will continue to be, a willing beneficiary. For the US, it will take more than 2+2 to tango in Asia.

More from GZERO Media

In this episode of The Ripple Effect: Investing in Life Sciences, host Dan Riskin speaks with Patrick Horber, President of Novartis International, and David Gluckman, Vice Chairman of Investment Banking and Global Head of Healthcare at Lazard. Together, they break down the outsized economic impact of life science innovation, from trillions in US bioscience output to China’s meteoric rise as a global R&D hub.

RPG-7 training of Ukrainian soldiers. November 17, 2024.
  • Adrien Vautier via Reuters Connect

People from different cultures often approach the same problem in different ways. We wondered — would an AI trained and tuned in China approach a complex geopolitical challenge differently than a model created and trained in Europe, or in the United States?

French President Emmanuel Macron speaks to the members of the media, after arriving by plane to attend the Gaza Peace Summit, in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, October 13, 2025.
Yoan Valat/Pool via REUTERS

2: French President Emmanuel Macron rejected calls to resign as his fragile government faces two no-confidence votes this week.

Palestinian children look at rubble following Israeli forces' withdrawal from the area, after Israel and Hamas agreed on the Gaza ceasefire, in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, October 10, 2025.
REUTERS/Ramadan Abed

Israel approved the Gaza ceasefire deal on Friday morning, bringing the ceasefire officially into effect. The Israeli military must withdraw its forces to an agreed perimeter inside Gaza within 24 hours, and Hamas has 72 hours to return the hostages.