The banking crisis, AI & Ukraine: Larry Summers weighs in

The banking crisis, AI & Ukraine: Larry Summers weighs in | GZERO World with Ian Bremmer

The recent spate of bank failures has caused significant turbulence in markets and left investors jittery across the globe, from Silicon Valley to Switzerland. But is this a sign of a systemic banking crisis or of a more fundamental flaw in capitalism? In an interview with Ian Bremmer on GZERO World, former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers provides an in-depth analysis of the situation.

Summers is critical of the management of Silicon Valley Bank and the federal government's intervention, which failed to prevent the banking turmoil. He also expresses concerns about the real estate sector, particularly when it comes to office buildings, and corporate lending to mid-sized businesses.

The conversation also delves into the impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market, with Summers cautioning that AI will "bring about significant changes" that will “profoundly alter traditional hierarchies and ways of thinking,” which may threaten influential groups. It’s even probable, he tells Bremmer, that we’ll see “restrictionist and protectionist policies that limit our ability to benefit from these technologies or slow down [their development].”

Summers also proposes a contentious solution to rebuild Ukraine: seizing frozen Russian assets.

More from GZERO Media

Polish presidential candidate Karol Nawrocki, backed by the main opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party, reacts to the exit polls of the second round of the presidential election, in Warsaw, Poland, June 1, 2025.
REUTERS/Aleksandra Szmigiel

Just when you thought the far right was in retreat in Eastern Europe, following recent losses in Romania and Albania, it came roaring back in Poland.

South Korean presidential candidate Lee Jae Myung of the Democratic Party speaks at a campaign rally in Seoul on May 29, 2025.
Kyodo via Reuters Connect

South Koreans head to the polls this Tuesday, June 3, to elect a new president. They’ll face a choice between two candidates with sharply contrasting visions for the country’s future — and its foreign policy.