In this “ask ian,” Ian Bremmer argues that the debate over whether the United States or China will lead artificial intelligence is overshadowing a more important question: who will govern a technology advancing faster than governments can regulate?
"It can't just be the tech companies. It can't just be the US government," Ian says, arguing that AI oversight must eventually extend beyond Washington and its allies because the technology itself is global.
Ian points out that Chinese AI models are already widely used by startups because they are cheaper and increasingly competitive with American alternatives. That reality, he argues, makes unilateral regulation ineffective.
Looking to history, Ian compares AI to other global challenges that required countries to work together, including nuclear weapons and financial crises. He argues that no single country or company can manage the risks alone.
Instead, governments around the world will need to find ways to monitor AI, communicate potential threats, and prevent the technology from being used in harmful ways.
More For You
Most Popular
Alberta is staying in Canada. But the more important results may have come from the nine other questions on the referendum ballot that have received considerably less attention.
A Democratic sweep in 2026 could shake up Washington. Will it change Trump’s grip on power or set the stage for 2028? Amy Walter and Liam Donovan join Ian Bremmer on GZERO World.
Could China give Europe a shortcut in the AI race?
Europe has struggled to build models that compete with American and Chinese rivals. But Chinese models that companies can download, customize, and run themselves could offer another way forward—with more control over data and security.