Ukraine is bringing the war to Russia, reshaping the battlefield and raising new questions about whether the momentum is finally shifting away from Vladimir Putin. In this GZERO World conversation with Ian Bremmer, former Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba explains why Ukraine believes it has changed the dynamics of the conflict.

For years, the war in Ukraine has been defined by one assumption: that time favors Russia. Moscow has more troops, more resources, and a greater willingness to absorb casualties, betting it can simply outlast Ukraine and its Western backers.

But the battlefield is changing. Ukrainian drones are striking military and energy targets deep inside Russia, exposing vulnerabilities that once seemed untouchable and forcing the Kremlin to defend territory far from the front lines. At the same time, Ukraine is strengthening its ties with NATO and Europe, even as the war enters another difficult winter.

Kuleba discusses why bringing the war to Russia is central to Kyiv's strategy, and whether growing pressure on Vladimir Putin could eventually force the Kremlin to rethink its approach. He also discusses President Trump's evolving stance on Ukraine, NATO's support, and why Europe cannot be secure without Ukraine.

More For You

- YouTube

In his latest Quick Take, Ian Bremmer argues that the war between the United States and Iran has entered a more dangerous phase, with both sides demonstrating they can sustain military and economic pressure without forcing the other to back down. The question is, will this standoff bring them back to the table before the conflict escalates further?

- YouTube

For years, Russia has counted on one advantage above all else: time. Ian Bremmer explains why Ukraine's expanding campaign inside Russia is challenging that assumption, and what it could mean for the future of the war.

US President Donald Trump speaks about election security during an address to the nation from the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., US, July 16, 2026
SAUL LOEB/Pool via REUTERS

The US president used a primetime address last night to argue America’s election system is broken and vulnerable to “rigging.” He pointed to documents he says show Chinese interference in the 2020 vote. But the evidence Trump offered, along with past assessments from the intelligence community, doesn’t support his broadest claims.

Farida Dowidar

Gabriel Perez, who has worked for the president since 2016, is under fire for his prediction market wagers, allegedly using his access to the speeches to make his bets