We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for Eurasia Group and its affiliates, including GZERO Media, to clarify the types of data we collect, how we collect it, how we use data and with whom we share data. By using our website you consent to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, including the transfer of your personal data to the United States from your country of residence, and our use of cookies described in our Cookie Policy.
{{ subpage.title }}
Swiss soldiers on a German-made Leopard 2 tank.
How tanks for Ukraine might impact NATO — and Russia
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky finally got what he’s spent months asking for — at least some of it. The US and Germany have agreed to send state-of-the-art battle tanks to Kyiv, and Berlin has greenlit other NATO members to send German-made armor to Ukraine as well.
But this policy U-turn by the US and Germany — both of which have long been reluctant to send such heavy kit — raises two big questions about the near-term trajectory of the war.
First, what does this say about how far Ukraine’s Western partners are willing to go? Military analysts expect the tanks to help the Ukrainians punch through Russian positions in the months to come. Some have even wondered whether they can do more than just push Russia back to the Feb. 24, 2022, lines.
With Western leaders having recently hinted at possible support for Kyiv’s bid to retake Crimea, the peninsula that Russia illegally annexed in 2014, the tank shipments could herald a new phase of the war entirely. But the main focus is clearly to give Ukraine a hand on the battlefield ahead of a spring offensive.
To allay concerns about escalation, NATO leaders are playing down the offensive nature of the tanks as weapons to attack Russian territory. This is about "helping Ukraine defend and protect Ukrainian land. It is not an offensive threat to Russia, there is no offensive threat to Russia," President Joe Biden said Wednesday as he announced that the US will send 31 Abrams tanks to Kyiv.
Still, it’s not clear how much these tanks will really change the face of the war — or how fast. Explicit pledges from Germany, the US, the UK, and Poland amount to 70+ units, but Ukraine is asking for more still. France is thinking it over, and other NATO members have kept things vague.
Even the tanks that have been pledged — especially the US-made Abrams — will take weeks, if not months, to arrive – and longer than that for the Ukrainians to learn to operate.
Second, how might Russia react? TV pundit Vladimir Solovyov, Moscow’s most colorful propagandist-in-chief, blasted the Germans as “European Pharisees! Nazi scumbags!” but so far the official response has been muted. Too quiet maybe? Perhaps, but there are two big things Russia might do.
The Russians could push forward their widely expected spring offensive in order to get in some good blows before the Ukrainians are ready to deploy those tanks. Russia is, after all, on a mini-roll again after its recent Wagner Group-led conquest of Soledar, a salt-mining city in eastern Ukraine, and the next target is probably Bakhmut, key to controlling the entire Donbas region.
Moscow could also move to target the shipments of tanks and their supply lines directly once they enter Ukrainian territory. Personnel from NATO countries assigned to train and service the tanks could be killed, putting the alliance in a tricky spot.
Wars are full of miscalculations and errors — any mistake in which a Russian missile strays across a NATO border would require cooler heads to prevail fast.
A US M1 Abrams tank fires a round during a live-fire exercise in Germany.
Ukraine tanks up
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz announced on Wednesday that Germany will (finally!) send Leopard 2 battle tanks to Ukraine.
It certainly took him a while, but after some mixed signals, Scholz ultimately caved to strong pressure from a group of NATO countries led by Poland to supply Kyiv with these German-made tanks to fight Russia. Berlin had so far resisted doing this — partly due to German resistance to poking the Russian bear and partly because Scholz likely wanted the US to take the first step by giving Ukraine its own Abrams tanks, which might also happen later this week.
How soon will tanks have an impact? Two tank battalions with roughly 80 Leopard 2 tanks will soon be deployed to Ukraine, Germany said. Training Ukrainian soldiers on how to use them will also “begin quickly” in Germany. But the delivery of and training on the Abrams is another story.
Any US tank shipments will likely not arrive before spring. The Ukrainian military doesn't know how to operate the Abrams tanks, and training takes an average of 22 weeks. Second, their supply lines for maintenance and spare parts can easily be cut off by the Russians. Finally, Abrams are fuel guzzlers — and many have pointed to the fuel expense as a reason not to employ Abrams in Ukraine. Defense analyst Nicholas Drummond points out, however, that they can run on any type of fuel, "even Chanel No. 5 if you can afford it."
Some US lawmakers have been pushing for the delivery of Abrams despite concerns by critics of the machinery being less versatile than Leopards. But some analysts believe both types of tanks will be needed to help Ukraine win the war. Whatever the make and model, sending tanks to Ukraine signals that the West is now willing to cross what was long considered a red line.
How does the General Dynamics-made Abrams stack up against Russia's T-14 Armata tank? The short answer is that no one knows because they were not designed to battle each other, but most military experts agree that while the Armata has better arms, the latest Abrams has superior mobility. The Leopard 2s, meanwhile, are considered quick and easy to use.
The tank U-turn has big implications for major players in the war. Who's happy? Ukraine, which for months has been begging its Western allies for heavily armored vehicles. Who's less happy? To a certain extent, Washington and Berlin, both wary of Russia escalating in response. And who's not happy at all? Russia, for whom the war just got even harder.Thousands of Israeli protesters rally against PM Benjamin Netanyahu's new government in Tel Aviv.
What We’re Watching: Israel’s mass anti-corruption protests, Sweden’s NATO own goal, Germany's mixed signals
Israelis protest proposed judiciary changes
Israelis took to the streets of Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Haifa, and Beersheba on Saturday to protest judicial changes proposed by PM Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu’s new government, the country’s most right-wing coalition to date. While demonstrations have been underway for weeks, more than 100,000 people gathered in Tel Aviv in the biggest rally yet to oppose the proposed reforms that they fear will weaken the High Court of Justice’s power and independence. Bibi’s government feels the judiciary is biased against it and interfering with its ability to govern, and the PM is vowing to push through the reforms despite the outcry. On Sunday, meanwhile, Bibi finally dismissed key ally Aryeh Deri as interior and health minister, days after the high court ruled he was ineligible to hold a senior cabinet post due to a previous criminal conviction. Deri is head of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party, some of whose members had threatened to turn away from Bibi's wobbly government if the PM fired their boss. Just weeks in, this is another sign that Bibi is going to have a hell of a time keeping his coalition together.
Sweden’s NATO bid in trouble after Quran-burning protest
Sweden is scrambling to contain the political fallout from Saturday’s far-right, Quran-burning protest outside the Turkish embassy in Stockholm, which triggered rallies near the Swedish consulate in Istanbul. Because the Swedish government had given the go-ahead for the demonstration, Turkey had already canceled planned bilateral talks about Sweden’s NATO bid before the rally. Now, Ankara is condemning the burning of the holy book for Muslims as an Islamophobic hate crime. The incident gives President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan fodder for whipping up nationalist sentiment in Turkey ahead of the country’s general election in May or June, as well as extra leverage over other NATO members, all of whom are hoping Ankara relents. The Turks have been using the joint bid by Finland and Sweden to join NATO — which requires unanimous approval — to force the two countries to tighten laws that allow Turkish and Kurdish dissidents to go there. Erdogan is now expected to further delay his consent — perhaps until after the election.