Trending Now
We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for Eurasia Group and its affiliates, including GZERO Media, to clarify the types of data we collect, how we collect it, how we use data and with whom we share data. By using our website you consent to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, including the transfer of your personal data to the United States from your country of residence, and our use of cookies described in our Cookie Policy.
Russia/Ukraine
2024 was a year of dramatic reversals. Some came at the ballot box, where long-ruling parties took a beating, anti-establishment figures stormed into power, or strongmen managed to see off what looked like fatal challenges. Some came on battlefields, where deadlocked conflicts began to break in one direction or another. And some came in how we think about politics and geopolitics more broadly.
This week, as we hurtle toward 2025, another year that promises to be pivotal in global affairs, we profile 10 people who, for better or worse, flipped the script, beat the odds, turned the tables, or otherwise changed the game in 2024.
GZERO's No. 10 2024 Game Changer: Italy’s Iron Lady
Who is she? Giorgia Meloni, 47, is Italy’s first female prime minister and the leader of the right-wing Fratelli d’Italia – Brothers of Italy – party. A staunch nationalist, Meloni rose to power in 2022, pledging to prioritize “God, family, and fatherland.” As a student, she was active in the neo-fascist Italian Social Movement before becoming Italy’s youngest-ever minister in Silvio Berlusconi’s government in 2008.
What did she accomplish in 2024? Meloni led her party to victory in Italy’s June elections, positioning herself as the “kingmaker” in the European Parliament. Her victory was due in part to her tough stance on migrants: Last year, Italy cut illegal immigration by 64%, inking agreements with Tunisia to reduce human smuggling and encouraging the EU to do the same with Egypt.
Meloni has faced pushback from Italian courts, however, on her plan to send migrants to Albanian processing centers. Herwide-ranging constitutional reforms to enhance executive power, including allowing the direct election of the prime minister, have also raised concern about potential shifts toward authoritarianism.
How has she changed the game? Meloni's migration crackdown found favor with other European leaders, including Hungarian President Viktor Orban. At the same time, she maintained strong support for Ukraine, recently authorizing Italy’s tenth military aid package for Kyiv. “Meloni has had a good year, and her fellow EU leaders in capitals and Brussels now hope she has been fully co-opted into the European mainstream,” said Mujtaba Rahman, Eurasia Group’s managing director for Europe.
What’s next for 2025? Meloni’s big domestic challenge is economic: Italy’s GDP is poised to grow by an anemic .5% in the coming year. Parliament passed several budget measures last week, including a one-off €100 Christmas bonus to 4.5 million disadvantaged families, and will continue allowing taxpayers to pre-pay their taxes for the next two years, regardless of how much they earn.
On the foreign policy front, Meloni may have an in with the incoming US administration in Elon Musk, with whom she famously traded compliments after he introduced her at the Atlantic Council’s Global Citizen Awards in October. However, Musk was subsequently seen to overstep when he criticized Italian judges who blocked deportations. And the two notably differ on future support for Ukraine. Time will tell whether Rome and Washington enjoy la bella vita – or not.
GZERO's No. 9 2024 Game Changer: Venezuela’s Strongman
Who is he? Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro has been in power for 11 years, and over the past seven of those years, he has presided over one of the most spectacular social collapses in the world. Economic mismanagement, political repression, and tight US sanctions prompted more than seven million people to flee in a migrant exodus that has reverberated across the region, from South America to South Brooklyn.
What did he accomplish in 2024? Heading into the presidential election this past July, then, it seemed almost certain that the game was up for Maduro. His approval ratings were in the gutter. A historically splintered opposition had united behind a single, reasonably popular candidate. The polling was so skewed against him it seemed like he’d have to steal the election outright to stay in power.
And that’s what he did. Even as all available evidence – including thousands of voter rolls from across the country – suggested he had lost in a landslide, his government published figures showing that he had won a narrow victory. And since then, that has been that. Threats and enticements from the US have failed to budge Maduro. His police have cracked down ferociously on the opposition. He appears to be going nowhere.
How has he changed the game? Maduro has reset what looked like a losing game not only for himself but also for various outside powers that had hoped to see him gone.
What’s next for 2025? Perhaps the most interesting piece of this story will involve the US and the incoming Trump administration.
Trump has pledged to deport millions of undocumented migrants, and many of them are Venezuelan. Where will they go? Repatriation to their home country will require an agreement of some kind with Maduro.
Trump’s Secretary of State nominee, Sen. Marco Rubio, is a Cuban-American who is ultra-hawkish on the communist regime in Cuba as well as its “21st-century socialist” backers in Caracas. If Rubio had his druthers, both governments would be out of power, but he will now need to deal tactfully with Maduro, who has shown that he is, for better or worse, to be reckoned with rather than written off.
“While Trump’s team has hinted at space for a negotiation related to migrants,” says Eurasia Group's Latin America Director Risa Grais-Targow, “the president-elect’s specific history with Maduro, loyalty to Florida voters, and preference for US oil and gas production will limit the scope for a grand bargain and further sanctions relief.”
GZERO’s No. 8 2024 Game Changer: South Africa’s divisive populist
Who is he? It’s not often a former president continues to play a crucial role in the longer-term direction of his country’s politics, but Jacob Zuma is no ordinary former president. From 2009-2018, the charismatic Zuma led the African National Congress and served as South Africa’s president. A series of corruption allegations forced him from power, and Zuma felt he’d been betrayed by his deputy, Cyril Ramaphosa, who is now the ANC’s leader and South Africa’s president.
What did he accomplish in 2024? In 2024, three years after he served two months in prison on a corruption-related charge, Zuma came for his revenge. He formed a brand new political party — uMkhonto we Sizwe, or MK — and ran again for president. The new party didn’t come close to winning nationally, but by drawing 45% support in Zuma’s home region, KwaZulu-Natal, he helped strip the ANC of its national majority.
How has he changed the game? The ANC, Nelson Mandela’s party, the political embodiment of liberation from apartheid, saw its national vote share fall from 57% in 2019 to just 40% in 2024. That stunning result then forced the ANC to invite the largest opposition party, the Democratic Alliance, to form a government of national unity. This is the first time the ANC has had to share national political power since the end of apartheid more than three decades ago.
Zuma’s ambitions were not the only factor that pushed down the ANC’s vote share so sharply. South Africa is still plagued with high unemployment, inflation, corruption, crumbling infrastructure, and a lack of economic opportunity for young people. But, according to Eurasia Group Africa expert Ziyanda Stuurman, “there is a direct line between Zuma’s political maneuvers [in 2024], and the emergence of a coalition government few people would have ever thought was possible.”
What’s next for 2025? It’s too early to say whether forcing the ANC to work with the opposition DA will prove positive or negative for South African politics, but it’s clear that Jacob Zuma changed the political game this year in his country. His challenges to Ramaphosa’s government will continue into 2025.GZERO’s No. 7 2024 Game Changer: Citizens who said ‘No’ to status quo
Who are they? Voters went to the polls this year in more than 50 countries with a combined population of more than 3.5 billion. A lot of them had strong messages to send their elected leaders.
What did they accomplish in 2024? In June, voters in India stunned outside observers by stripping the still-popular Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party of its majority in parliament. The result forced the BJP to turn to fickle allies to pass more of Modi’s reform agenda and limited his room for maneuver.
Also in June, voters in South Africa made history by depriving the African National Congress of its majority for the first time in the country’s post-apartheid history. With just 40% of the vote, the ANC was forced to invite the opposition Democratic Alliance to form a unity government — one that has held together contrary to expectations, it must be said.
In July, voters in France punished their centrist President Emmanuel Macron by casting ballots for enough far-left and far-right parties to gut the political center. After struggling to form a government to advance state spending reforms, left- and right-wing parties came together to force Michel Barnier, a compromise choice for PM, out of his job. France’s political crisis continues.
Also in July, fed-up voters in the UK ended 14 years of rule by the Conservative Party in favor of Labour, led by new Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. The Conservatives' share of parliamentary seats fell from 252 to just 121, in part because Nigel Farage’s new Reform UK party drew much of the Tories’ support. And British politics has only become more combative. A November poll found that the percentage of UK adults with an unfavorable view of Starmer’s work as PM outnumbers those who approve by well over two to one.
In October, a shock election result in Japan cost the Liberal Democratic Party its majority in the Diet, the country’s legislature. The LDP has held power almost continuously for nearly 70 years.
In November, Donald Trump carried all the so-called swing states in a victory that will replace President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris with a Republican Party administration.
“Unemployment hurts a small number of people a lot, but inflation irritates everyone,” notes Eurasia Group’s Vice Chairman Gerald Butts. “Incumbents are discovering that hurting all of the people even some of the time makes the whole country angry at their government.”
GZERO’s No. 6 2024 Game Changer: Russia’s ruthless leader
Who is he? Vladimir Putin, the ex-KGB agent who has ruled Russia without interruption since the turn of the millennium, hardly needs an introduction – you know the name. But even after nearly a quarter century in power, he continues to flip scripts year in and year out, and 2024 was no different.
What did he accomplish in 2024? As recently as a year ago, Ukraine and its Western backers still held out hope that Kyiv’s forces might push back the Russian invaders who have laid waste to so much of the country since the 2022 invasion. Since then, Putin has – slowly, cynically, but successfully – shown otherwise.
Today, Russian forces are grinding their way westward in the Donbas while Ukraine suffers shortages of manpower. Kyiv’s bid to divert Russian attention from Eastern Ukraine by invading a small corner of Russia itself in August hasn’t worked out – Putin didn’t take the bait, instead calling in North Korean troops to help repel the Ukrainian incursion.
Meanwhile, US President-elect Donald Trump has questioned support for Ukraine and pledged to end the war “in 24 hours.”
How has he changed the game? By altering perceptions of what’s possible. “In 2025, Ukrainian society will be reassessing their all-or-nothing view of victory,” says Tim Mak, editor of “The Counteroffensive” in Kyiv. “As a democratic country, Ukrainians are increasingly expressing a willingness to negotiate -- and a fear that continuing the war could lead to frontline disaster due to manpower shortages.”
What’s next for 2025? Not everything is roses for Putin these days. His heavily sanctioned economy grows only because of massive military spending. Inflation is high. The population continues to shrink, as birth rates are low and hundreds of thousands of talented young people have left in opposition to the war. Russian casualties in Ukraine now dwarf those of the late Soviet Union in Afghanistan. Globally, Moscow is increasingly the junior partner to a rising China, and the Kremlin just lost Syria, its most important ally in the Middle East.
But heading into 2025, Putin has set himself up to negotiate over Ukraine, and potentially over other issues, from a position of greater strength than many had believed, or hoped, just a year ago.
Honorable Mention: Kim Jong Un
Who is he? Kim Jong Un, the 40-year-old Supreme Leader of North Korea, has been at the helm of the Hermit Kingdom since his father, Kim Jong Il, died in 2011. Following a ruthless consolidation of power, he has directed his energy and the state’s meager finances toward expanding the country’s nuclear weapons program, which he sees as central to North Korean security and sovereignty.
What did he accomplish in 2024? He concluded a mutual defense treaty with Russia while hosting President Vladimir Putin in Pyongyang in June — the first visit to the city by a Russian leader in a quarter century — that laid the groundwork for his deployment of troops to fight in Ukrainian-occupied areas of Russia. The deployment is a major escalation compared to the weapons aid he has been supplying Moscow since 2023, though thus far he has acted with total impunity. That treaty also opened much deeper cooperation with Russia to advance North Korea’s military technology, including progress on nuclear-powered submarines and a more powerful ballistic missile as well as attempts to launch spy satellites.
Kim radically overhauled his government's policy toward South Korea. In January, he renounced the goal of reunification with the South, officially removing it from the constitution. He also rather theatrically destroyed road and rail links to the south, constructed during a period of rapprochement at the turn of the 21st century.
How has he changed the game? By changing the terms on which it’s played. “The dramatic deepening of North Korea-Russia diplomatic and security ties in 2024,” says Eurasia Group expert Jeremy Chan, “has given Pyongyang more strategic optionality and greater assurance that neither South Korea nor the US will attempt an invasion.”
Seoul and Washington can’t credibly threaten military action without running unacceptable risks, and Kim’s control over domestic affairs still appears iron-clad. What’s more, by deepening relations with Moscow, Kim puts pressure on his frenemies in Beijing, who have few tools at their disposal in the relationship besides accommodation.
What’s next for 2025? If Kim has his druthers, talks with Donald Trump to secure recognition of his nuclear status. “These various nuclear and defense-related capabilities attained in 2024 will provide Kim with leverage in future negotiations with Trump,” says Chan, “while allowing Pyongyang to retain its hard-won nuclear deterrent, something which Kim has vowed will never be bargained away.”
Couple that with political chaos in the South after Yoon Suk Yeol’s attempted coup in early December, and it’s looking like the peninsula is in for a wild ride next year.
GZERO’s No. 5 2024 Game Changer: The Syrian rebel who reshaped the region
Who is he? The 42-year-old leader of the Syrian jihadist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, or HTS, al-Golani, born Ahmed Hussein Al-Shara, grew up in a middle-class Syrian family. He went to Iraq in 2003 to fight with al-Qaida against the US occupation, taking his nom de guerre “al-Golani” to honor relatives displaced from the Golan Heights, an area of Syria that Israel has occupied since 1967.
After the Syrian civil war began in 2011, al-Golani founded the anti-Assad jihadist Nusra Front group, which later rebranded as HTS.
In recent years, as he established control over northwestern Syria, al-Golani has sought to distance himself from global jihad and present himself as a statesman interested in stabilizing Syria.
What did he accomplish in 2024? In early December, HTS led a military campaign that surged across the country, capturing key cities within days. When the Syrian regime’s longtime backers in Russia and Iran failed to send more support to Bashar Assad, the game was up. In little more than a week, al-Golani’s forces had toppled the 54-year-old House of Assad.
How has he changed the game? The collapse of the famously despotic Assad regime has sent shockwaves through the region. Syria, for decades a bulwark of expanding regional power for Shia Iran, as well as Russia, is now under the nominal control of HTS, a Sunni group with links to Turkey, a country politically at odds with most major Arab powers. Israel is watching warily and has already struck at Syrian arms depots to prevent them from falling into the hands of anti-Zionist groups. Donald Trump wants the US to “stay out of it,” but he’ll inherit the nearly 1,000 US troops in Syria fighting Islamic State remnants. Iran and Russia, for their part, can hardly be expected to simply fade away.
What’s next for 2025? Al-Golani’s rule is barely a week old. He must establish order in a fractious country wrecked by more than a decade of brutal civil war. Can he? And will his vision of Syria allow the country’s sectarian minorities to live in peace and dignity? Is there a world where the 7 million Syrian refugees who have gone to Turkey and Europe since 2011 really choose to return?
In some ways, “the collapse of the Assad regime is the Middle East’s most hopeful moment in over a decade,” says Firas Maksad, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute in Washington, DC. “But it carries within it the seeds of further communal and regional conflicts that could persist for a decade to come.”
What we know for sure is that al-Golani’s forces have already smashed decades-old assumptions about the balance of geopolitical, regional, and sectarian power in a volatile region. Whatever comes next begins now.
GZERO’s No. 4 2024 Game Changer: Israel’s political survivor
Who is he? Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu leads the right-wing Likud Party. He grew up in Israel and the US, attended the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and worked for the Boston Consulting Group before returning to Israel, where he rose quickly through Likud’s ranks and was appointed Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations and party chairman.
He was the first Israeli prime minister elected by direct popular vote in 1996 and served until 1999. He regained the premiership from 2009 to 2021, and then again in November 2022. His latest administration has been marked by the Oct. 7, 2023 attack by Hamas, mistreatment of Palestinian groups, limiting the Supreme Court’s power, and his own legal challenges, including charges of bribery and fraud.
What did he accomplish in 2024? Netanyahu has, as he promised in the wake of Oct. 7, reshaped the balance of power in the Middle East.
He has greatly weakened Israel’s adversaries, Hezbollah and Hamas, eliminating Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar and Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah. Israel used the fall of Syria’s Assad regime as an opportunity to take control of areas in Syria beyond the Golan Heights and take out its neighbor’s military capabilities. Meanwhile, doubts about Israel’s deterrence abilities following Oct. 7 have been restored after it largely shot down all of Iran’s retaliatory missile strikes.
Eurasia Group’s Senior Analyst Greg Brew says Netanyahu’s greatest triumph was overseeing the war against Hezbollah, which decimated the group’s leadership, killed thousands of its fighters, and degraded its capacity to strike Israeli cities.
“The war has been a clear Israeli victory, though it will need follow-through to turn into a strategic success,” says Brew. “But given how real the threat of Hezbollah had appeared in the past, the fact Netanyahu was able to prosecute the war without triggering a devastating Hezbollah attack on Israeli cities is a notable achievement.”
How did he change the game? Netanyahu began 2024 with 85% of Israelis calling for his removal and officials circulating petitions calling him an “existential threat” to the country over his handling of the Gaza War. He is accused of abandoning the Oct. 7 hostages and prolonging the war for his own benefit.
He ignored US demands to treat Gazans humanely, calling Washington’s bluff over withholding military aid if Israel did not increase the flow of food and humanitarian aid. However, doing so has further alienated Israel on the global stage, leading global institutions, leaders, and human rights groups to accuse Netanyahu of committing genocide in Gaza.
Nevertheless, he is ending the year with a 47% approval rating, seeing his popularity rebound after his aggressive campaign against Hezbollah and Iran. “Netanyahu is looking much stronger than he was six months ago,” says Brew. “The war against Hezbollah, the strikes on Iran, and the decimation of Hamas has strengthened his claim to be the strongest figure ensuring Israel’s security.”
While centrist figures like Yoav Gallant and Benny Gantz have departed his cabinet, forcing Netanyahu to rely more heavily on far-right figures, “he has kept his coalition together and looks likely to do so in 2025,” explains Brew.
What to expect from him in 2025? In the year ahead, Netanyahu is likely to benefit from and be emboldened by the Trump administration. Donald Trump shares Israel’s hatred of Iran, supports the Gaza War ending on Israel's terms, and has appointed Mike Huckabee, who is vocally in support of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, as the ambassador to Israel. Netanyahu's dependence on far-right figures like Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich will constrain his options when it comes to normalizing relations with Arab states like Saudi Arabia — something Brew says is certain to be a US priority under Trump.
But with US support all but guaranteed and public sentiment back behind him, Netanyahu is likely to continue his aggressive maneuvers in the Middle East into 2025.
“Netanyahu’s foreign policy priority in 2025 will be addressing the threat posed by Iran, and specifically Iran's nuclear programs,” says Brew. “I expect this to be the focal point in his relationship with Trump, along with issues of importance to his coalition, such as confirming US support for the settlement of territory — and perhaps even the partial annexation — of the West Bank.”
GZERO’s No. 3 2024 Game Changer: Those responsible for global migration
Who are they? The migrant took many forms in 2024, driven by armed conflicts, economic downturns, and the promise of opportunity – but their numbers fell as countries clamped down and closed borders. Irregular crossings of Middle Eastern and African migrants to Europe dropped by 42% in the first nine months of the year. Latin American migrants pursued better economic prospects in the US, but their numbers also declined sharply. Asian and South Asian emigres moved to Australia and Canada for education and jobs, but those countries also cut numbers back. In Africa, South Africa implemented a points system to prioritize skilled workers, while intra-continental migration surged in the North due to unrest in Sudan.
What did the migrant accomplish in 2024? Economically, migrants played a crucial role in labor markets, filling gaps in sectors like agriculture, healthcare, and technology. In some countries, their economic impact helped stave off a recession. But some migrant groups exacerbated social tensions, notably around issues that engaged their diasporas, such as the Israel-Hamas War, and also put a strain on cash-strapped public services.
And the latter issue caused a backlash among voters. “Since the pandemic, there has been a major increase in the number of immigrants, primarily legal ones, to Canada, the US, Europe, and the UK to address labor shortages,” said Graeme Thompson, senior analyst at Eurasia Group. “The problem is that first, those numbers increased very rapidly to historically unprecedented levels, and second, that has been combined with preexisting stresses on housing and social services. And that combination has proved politically explosive."
How did the migrant change the game? This past year, the migrant shaped elections around the world. Illegal immigration was the pivotal issue in the US presidential election, as now-President-elect Donald Trump accused the Democrats of failing to control America’s borders and blamed illegals for a surge in crime. In Europe, Austria's general election campaign was dominated by migration issues, with the far-right Freedom Party advocating for stringent asylum policies, while in Germany and Italy, anti-immigration parties saw a surge in support. Immigration was a key election issue in South Africa, where the ANC lost its majority as opposition parties pushed anti-migrant policies.
What to expect in 2025? The migrant will remain a source of tension as countries continue to clamp down on illegal immigration. Trump’s deportation plans could provoke a surge of migrants to Canada, prompting the Canadian government to announce a billion dollars in spending to harden its southern border. European countries, meanwhile, have stopped processing the claims of Syrian refugees in the wake of Bashar Assad’s overthrow, and many refugees plan to return home. But it remains to be seen whether the new regime will provoke a new exodus as minority groups such as the Kurds may feel under threat. The impact of immigration on housing has become a central issue in Canada and Australia, both set to have elections in 2025. And in Africa, the ongoing war in Sudan has displaced 11 million people and doesn’t look to end any time soon.
GZERO’s No. 2 2024 Game Changer: Billionaire entrepreneur
Who is he? The CEO of X, Tesla, and SpaceX, Elon Musk is the wealthiest and possibly the most powerful private citizen in the world. He controls a revolutionary space company, America’s top electric vehicle producer, and a big chunk of the global public square formerly known as Twitter. In 2025, he’s set to be the beneficiary of the biggest political bet of 2024: spending over $100 million in donations andleveraging his 200-plus million followers on X to support a Trump win for the American presidency.
What did he accomplish in 2024? In 2024, Musk became a political kingmaker. Musk’s financial and technological backing of the Trump campaign, including his use of AI-driven voter engagement tools,upended traditional election strategies. After Trump’s victory, Musk was appointed Director of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, a newly created position that will leverage private sector innovation to streamline federal operations. He even earned the praise of arch-lefty Sen. Bernie Sanders, who said “Elon Musk is right” to want to curb wasteful Pentagon spending.
How has he changed the game? Musk’s influence on politics and governance is unprecedented. By combining his tech empire with his growing political clout, Musk has blurred the lines between private enterprise and public policy. Musk has turned up on phone calls and meetings with global leaders (Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky,Hungary’s Viktor Orban) and, closer to home, technology rivals (Google CEO Sundar Pichai).
What’s next for 2025? With DOGE, Musk plans to unveil a federal efficiency initiative targeting defense spending and bureaucratic red tape. While he’s not taking a salary, new programs could significantly benefit SpaceX, particularly in the area of military logistics and battlefield AI, raising questions of a conflict of interest. And Starlink’s satellites could replace Washington’s existing plans for hard-wired broadband infrastructure.
What does this mean for other companies seeking to do business with Washington – and for politicos seeking influence? “Getting on Elon’s good side has never been more important,” observes Eurasia Group President Ian Bremmer. “And for all the whispering in Trump circles that the White House won’t be big enough for their two personalities and wills, both men deserve credit for being extremely careful in managing relationships where their livelihood is at stake.”
GZERO’s No. 1 2024 Game Changer: MAGA in chief
Who is he? At this point, Donald Trump – GZERO’s top political game changer of the year – needs no introduction. The New York native and real estate mogul began his political career in 2015, cementing it a year later by beating Hillary Clinton to win the presidency. But he was defeated by Joe Biden in 2020 in large part because of how he handled the COVID-19 pandemic, his harsh immigration policies, and his pattern of erratic behavior.
What did he accomplish in 2024? The former president turned president-elect is set to return to the White House after winning the electoral college and the popular vote in what was meant to be a close election. Trump is backed by a Republican-controlled Congress, a conservative majority on the Supreme Court, and a cabinet of loyalists determined to implement his policy agenda.
“Trump won the closest thing you can these days that counts as a mandate, and he’s the first Republican to win the popular vote since 2004,” says Eurasia Group’s US expert Noah Daponte-Smith. “That’s a big accomplishment, and it matters to the way he’s going to govern.”
How did he change the game? Trump’s win was no inevitability. Flash back to the Republican primaries, when he faced competition from Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley – until, that is, voters showed that the base remained squarely in Trump’s camp.
He prevailed despite facing 34 soon-to-be-obsolete felony convictions, the fallout from the Jan. 6 insurrection, and two states attempting to kick him off their primary ballots. In fact, in many ways, Trump used those setbacks to his advantage, spinning them to rally voters to the polls.
Trump won every swing state, accumulating the most electoral college votes for a Republican since 1988. He widened the party’s base, winning 2.5 million more votes than when he ran as the incumbent in 2020.
In doing so, he revealed the country had swung to the right, turned out a record number of young male voters, and made inroads with some Democrats – increasing his support among every demographic group besides women. He survived an assassination attempt against him and used it to further rally his party around him. The GOP is now Trump’s party, and any remaining old-school Republicans who may have opposed him have been left party-less – some even crossed the aisle to endorse Kamala Harris.
An underrated contributor to Trump’s victory was his “mastery of the new information ecosystem,” notes Daponte-Smith. “Trump’s podcast blitz in the middle of the campaign baffled many at the time but in retrospect looks to have been a deft move that enabled him to make substantial inroads among demographics that traditionally don’t lean Republican.”
What to expect from him in 2025. Even before his inauguration on Jan. 20, Trump is meeting with world leaders, compiling a cabinet of loyalists, and vowing to implement punishing tariffs on America’s allies and enemies.
In conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, Trump is likely to push for temporary ceasefires to demonstrate his peacemaking abilities, which may ultimately result in the partitioning of Ukraine and expanded Israeli power over Palestine. Meanwhile, he will likely restart his “maximum pressure” campaign to heavily sanction Iran.
Daponte-Smith says he is expecting Trump to make headway in three key areas: trade, taxes, and immigration. He will likely substantially raise tariffs on China in the first year while limiting illegal immigration to the US and ramping up deportations. “The tax bill at the end of the year, which will very likely extend all of the 2017 tax cuts, will be the cherry on top for Republicans, who know that trifectas tend to be short-lived and are looking to move quickly to make the most of this one.”
- 2023 game changers that weren’t ›
- Top 10 game changers of 2023 ›
- What Assad’s fall means for Syria, the Middle East, Moscow and Washington ›
- G7 meeting: Ukraine and Meloni take center stage ›
- Netanyahu's uncompromising UNGA address ›
- How will Trump 2.0 approach foreign policy? ›
- Elon Musk and the Political Power of Young Men ›
Yesterday, we talked about why, among all the external powers involved in Syria, Turkey is probably the biggest immediate winner from the fall of Bashar Assad.
Now, we turn to the main losers. There are two, and they are big: Russia and Iran.
Both countries were huge backers of the Assad regime for decades, seeing Syria as the centerpiece of their Middle East policies. That’s why Tehran and Moscow intervened so heavily to support Assad around 2015 when his regime was on its back foot in Syria’s raging civil war.
But last week, as HTS-led militants met little resistance from Syrian government forces on the road to Damascus, both Russia and Iran decided to pull the plug. Now both are, for the time being, largely out of the picture in Syria.
Here’s what each country faces with the end of Assad.
Russia: military installations and clout
The Russian naval base at Tartus is Moscow’s only warm water port. For years, it enabled the Kremlin to project naval power into the Mediterranean and keep NATO on its toes in the region. The Russian airbase at Khmeimim, meanwhile, not only helped Moscow support military forces throughout the Middle East and Africa, but it also featured sophisticated air defenses that gave Russia a role in shaping the Israel-Syria standoff – whenever the IDF launched airstrikes against Iran-aligned targets in Syria, they had to at least be aware of Russia’s air defenses.
Now the fate of those facilities is unclear
Russia has reportedly evacuated some personnel, equipment, and weaponry, but there appears to be at least the possibility of some kind of agreement with HTS that permits Moscow to continue using the Tartus and Khmeimim facilities. As part of that, the Kremlin may seek to exploit its longstanding economic influence in Syria, as well as its potential to serve as a kind of counterbalance if the new government worries about excessive Turkish influence.
But the stakes are high. Russia will have a hard time replacing these facilities elsewhere in the region. US allies like Egypt or the Gulf states are unlikely to host Russian assets for fear of blowback from Washington. And while Russia has friends in Libya and Algeria, it would take years to construct facilities as sophisticated as what the Kremlin had in Syria.
Beyond the potential hard-power hits, Russia’s soft power has suffered too. Assad wasn’t the only embattled leader who leaned on Moscow for support in the face of severe pressure from the West. But Moscow’s inability, or unwillingness, to come to Assad’s aid in his final hours of need might raise alarm among the Maduros, Diaz Canels, Kims, and Lukashenkos of the world. The value of an alliance with Vladimir Putin just lost a few kopeks on the ruble.
Iran: a regional strategy in ruins
Whatever losses Russia has suffered, they pale next to the impact on Iran. Syria was the centerpiece of Iran’s once-powerful “Axis of Resistance” against Israel and the United States. The country was critical for Tehran’s Hezbollah proxies next door in Lebanon who got Iranian weapons and rear support via Syria while also profiting from the country’s smuggling markets and illicit narcotics industries. In addition, the Assad regime reliably bought tens of billions of dollars worth of oil that Iran couldn’t sell elsewhere because of Western sanctions.
And lastly, Syria was an extra 70,000 square miles of friendly territory between Iran and its regional arch-enemies in Israel, important for a Tehran that is perpetually worried about the prospect of Israeli strikes on its nuclear program or other military installations.
True, the new Syrian government, run for now by the supposedly reformed Sunni jihadists of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, or HTS, isn’t likely to be much friendlier to Israel. And the IDF has already destroyed much of the military hardware that Assad’s regime left behind, for fear of it falling into hostile hands. But HTS views Iran and Hezbollah as arch-enemies, making it harder for Tehran to picture an HTS-led Syria as a dependable deterrent against Israel.
Take all of that together with Israel’s decapitation and defanging of Hezbollah and Hamas – Iran’s two main proxies in the region – and Tehran’s regional clout is at its lowest ebb in years.
The Iranian government has tried to put a brave face on all of this, declaring earlier this week that it would “use all its regional and international capacities to stop the crimes of the Zionist regime against Syria.”
The trouble for Iran, like Russia, is that in one fell swoop, much of those regional and international capacities now lie in ruins.
Assad’s fall, Romania’s canceled election, Trump’s Taiwan approach, and more: Your questions, answered
How did Bashar Assad get driven out of Syria after more than 20 years in power? What are your thoughts on his replacements?
I was surprised that Assad fell. He’s been such an important client for both Iran and Russia for decades and received their immediate support when the rebels began their offensive. But this was a particularly opportune time for the rebels to strike. Assad’s powerful friends were both distracted in other arenas: Iran with Israel (in both Gaza and, more importantly for Iran, Lebanon) and Russia with Ukraine. Interestingly, there is one key throughline connecting the fall of Mosul (Iraq), Kabul (Afghanistan), and Damascus (Syria) — all three were held by conscript armies that were fed, equipped, and trained by corrupt regimes … and when attacked by fierce radical groups fled as quickly as they could.
On its face, the fall of one of the world’s most oppressive dictators should be good news. Assad’s war against his own people led to the deaths of over 500,000 Syrians and millions of refugees fleeing into Turkey and from there to Europe. But I’m not yet confident that what’s replacing his regime will be much better. The Turkish-backed militants in charge are Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, or HTS, a former al-Qaida affiliate in Syria that formally cut ties with the terrorists but is still (as of now) labeled a terrorist organization by the United States and NATO. Turkey wasn’t all in on removing Assad (at first). If the regime change goes well (a big if), the real winner here will be Turkey, with Recep Tayyip Erdoğan sending millions of Syrian refugees back home, becoming the main influence on strategically important Syria, and leading the fight against the Islamic State. This would land Erdoğan in Donald Trump’s good graces if it leads to a withdrawal of American troops.
HTS is clearly serious about establishing itself as the new, legitimate government — and a policy (for now) of relative moderation and tolerance toward other groups in the country is making that easier. But there are still so many unknowns and reasons that this can go terribly wrong.
Can Romania just cancel an election?
The constitutional court decided it’s “better to ask for forgiveness than permission.” After a massive far-right influence campaign by external (well … Russian) forces on TikTok and other social platforms was uncovered, Romania became the first democracy to ever cancel an election because of a disinformation campaign. This move will land the country in hot water regardless of the results of the rescheduled election. The court is viewed as highly politicized, so the decision will ultimately undermine it and whoever the future president may be – unless the far-right fringe candidate is allowed to run, and win, again.
How could President Trump’s plan to negotiate a ceasefire in Ukraine on “day one” impact China’s approach to Taiwan?
Whether China will push to undermine the cross-strait status quo during Trump’s second term is still up for debate. But Trump’s transactional approach to the war in Ukraine won’t affect China’s approach to Taiwan, at least in the near term. Beijing is still several years away from being able to credibly launch an invasion and take over the self-governing democracy. For now, China’s leaders are much more focused on regaining their own economic footing. That said, President-elect Trump’s interest in defending an island thousands of miles from the United States (and incredibly close to mainland China) is questionable at best. Many of his advisors care a great deal about Taiwanese sovereignty as a matter of US national security and longstanding American values, but Trump himself is much more interested in the country’s bilateral trade balance with the US.
What does Russia after Putin realistically look like?
If Vladimir Putin dies tomorrow, don’t expect a seismic shift at the Kremlin. Far more likely, his replacement would be another strongly anti-Western, nationalist leader who would fill the vacuum left by Putin’s departure. Such a successor would likely be more risk-averse, having to derive legitimacy and maintain power through the support of the country’s military, intelligence, and security leaders. It’s hard to imagine a dramatic shift in Russia’s geopolitical orientation when most of the country feels like the United States and “the West” have been out to squash their country’s power for decades.
Could a multi-party proportional representation system fix American politics?
America’s two-party system provides unique challenges for government representation by fostering an “us vs. them” tribalist sentiment, dividing the country into only two camps. It would be harder to immediately brand the opposing party as “the enemy of the state” if Americans had more choices. So, a shift to a multi-party system would allow a broader spectrum of ideologies into DC, and across the country, that would more closely reflect the diversity of the country’s population as a whole, which I think would be a constructive development. That said, it's hard to see how we could ever get from here to there given the stronghold on American politics (and the insane amount of funding) that the current duopoly has.
Why do you always defend the United Nations?
Some may find it controversial, but I’m proud of the United Nations. A truly global institution created by the United States out of the rubble of World War II, the UN charter reflects the very best of American values. As an institution, the UN no doubt has problems. The Security Council (and its veto powers) reflects a geopolitical order that no longer exists, lacks representation, and is accordingly broken. In the General Assembly, each country (no matter how small) has one vote but without enforcement power is generally weak and ineffective. Countries vote and veto in ways many of us wish they didn’t (but you should blame those countries, not the UN, for that).
What gets lost in the critiques of the bureaucracy of the United Nations is the amount of good that the organization does on a global scale, and with limited expenses (which, by the way, is where most of American funding for the United Nations is spent). The World Health Organization, World Food Organization, UNICEF, and other UN arms are systematically looking out for the world’s poorest and most vulnerable in ways most singular countries couldn’t be bothered to do alone.
Today, the world is heading to a post-carbon energy future, and that’s in no small part due to the architecture set up by the United Nations. Plus, new initiatives like the creation of a global framework for artificial intelligence (which I’ve been happy to be a part of) signal more positive developments are still to come on the only stage where every country in the world can have a voice.
What is on your radar over the next 24 months and not being discussed enough?
While there’s constant talk about artificial intelligence impacting our daily lives, the deployment of large-scale AI applications to an individual’s every dataset is not being discussed nearly enough. Personalized decisions or predictions based on human behavior patterns ascribed in large datasets are coming our way shortly. Before you know it, we will all have tools that will change humanity as we know it — in productive ways and post-human ways.
Where do you get your news, and what news sources do you trust?
As you might expect, the folks at Eurasia Group and GZERO Media act as my North Star when news breaks. With about 250 brilliant employees scattered across the globe working tirelessly to understand the inner workings of their areas of expertise, they bring priceless insight into what’s going on in the world on any given day. More broadly, it’s helpful for people to look outside their bubbles and read news coverage from outside their country of origin. For me, the Canadians (CBC), Germans (DW), Japanese (NHK), Arabs (Al Jazeera, etc.), and others cover the world in a much more effective way than the coverage we get from one hour of insular news coverage on cable television (or even from sitting down with the New York Times or Wall Street Journal).
What are your thoughts on pineapple on pizza?
Well, that depends. I’ll allow pineapple if there’s also ham and something spicy on top like jalapenos or chili flakes. Even then, I can probably think of 20 other things that I’d rather have as a pizza topping. Still, pineapple is preferable to cuttlefish – a Japanese fan favorite.
Are you hiring?
Eurasia Group is always looking for new talent – not just in our New York office but around the world. I am not personally involved in hiring, though, which is probably for the best. Thankfully we have a CEO and management team who make running the firm look easy. We’d be nowhere near as successful without them. Left to my own devices, I might run us into the ground. Ask anyone at Eurasia Group, they’ll totally agree with me.President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to end Russia’s war with Ukraine. That would require Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russia’s President Vladimir Putin to open negotiations – and to find enough common ground to agree at least to a ceasefire. Putin and Zelensky are now trying to strengthen their respective bargaining positions before talks can begin.
On Monday, Zelenskysaid via social media that he’s open to the possibility of Western governments posting troops on Ukrainian territory to guarantee his country’s territorial integrity, an idea firstsuggested publicly by France’s President Emmanuel Macron in February. “But before that, we must have a clear understanding of when Ukraine will be in the European Union and when Ukraine will be in NATO,” Zelensky wrote.
The EU and NATO remain unlikely to commit to precise membership timetables until it becomes clear what Ukraine’s future borders will be, and many Western leaders remain opposed to deploying troops into a warzone that could involve them directly in a war with Russia. For now, Zelensky continues to work with the outgoing Joe Biden administration to bolster his weapons stockpiles and to win more freedom to use Western weapons against his targets inside Russia.
There’s another political transition that Zelensky is watching carefully: Germany will hold national elections in February, and current Chancellor Olaf Scholz will likely lose his job to Friedrich Merz, the head of the center-right Christian Democratic Union. Merz is more publicly hawkish on helping Ukraine repel Russian invaders. That prospect gives Zelensky some hope that European backing for Ukraine will remain even if Trump dials back US support.Syria’s government has fallen, precipitating change across the region and beyond. How did things get here, and where could they go?
Syria under Assad
The Syrian civil war, sparked by the Arab Spring of 2011, began as protests against the dictatorship of Bashar Assad, who took over from his father after Hafez Assad died in 2000. Known as “the Butcher of Damascus,” Bashar Assad killed and imprisoned thousands of political opponents and minority populations withthe support of Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah. The conflict killed over500,000 Syrians and displaced half the country’s population of 26 million people, prompting a refugee exodus to neighboring Turkey as well as Europe, the USA, and Canada.
Over the weekend, Assad fled with his family and was granted asylum in Moscow.
New rebel leadership
In just two weeks, insurgents seized control of major Syrian cities including Aleppo, Homs, Hama, and the capital, Damascus, and officially toppled Assad’s regime on Saturday. The main rebel force, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, or HTS, is led by Abu Mohammad al-Golani, a former al-Qaida militant whoin the last decade has transformed from radical jihadist to ostensible pragmatist. Skeptics question the authenticity of his change of heart, however, andHTS is still designated as a terrorist group by many countries, including the United States.
Regional impacts
Iran: The collapse of Assad’s regime deals a significant blow to Iran’s "Axis of Resistance,"severing a crucial conduit for arms to Hezbollah in Lebanon and diminishing Tehran's influence in the region. This leaves it more vulnerable to anydirect conflict with Israel.
Lebanon: US envoy Amos Hochstein believes the Syrian war’s outcomewill have a “massive impact” on Lebanon as it reduces Iran’s ability to send weapons to Hezbollah. Syria’s instability could also worsen Lebanon’s fragile economic state.
Israel: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahuattributed Assad’s fall to Israel’s “forceful action against Hezbollah and Iran.” Israel has nonethelessdeployed forces into the Golan Heights to protect its border andstruck military targets inside Syria to prevent weapons from falling into the hands of hostile forces including Hezbollah.
Turkey: Turkey has backed rebel forces throughout Syria’s 13-year war as part of its geopolitical rivalry with Iran, and the outcome is seen as a win for Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Celebrations have erupted among Syrians in Turkey over Assad’s fall, and it is estimated that up to 50% of refugees theremay choose to return.
Superpower Stressors
Russia: Since the war began, Vladimir Putin has provided political support, military aid, and direct military intervention. This loss weakens Russia’s strategic position in the Middle East, including jeopardizing control over its Syrian air base in Hmeimim and naval air base in Tartus.
Russia’s military commitments in Ukraine are also blamed forweakening Moscow’s ability to support Assad’s regime. Following his ouster, US President-elect Donald Trumpcalled on Moscow for “an immediate ceasefire” in Ukraine.
The United States: The US has 900 troops in eastern Syria fighting against the re-establishment of the Islamic State and will remain there “to ensure [the group’s] enduring defeat, to ensure the secure detention of ISIS fighters and the repatriation of displaced persons,"according to Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East Daniel Shapiro. Under President Barack Obama, the US authorized thousands of airstrikes on Syria and Iraq starting in 2014 as part ofOperation Inherent Resolve, part of an international effort to destroy the Islamic State.
This time around, US President-elect Donald Trumpposted to Truth Social on Saturday that the US “SHOULD HAVE NOTHING TO DO” with the conflict in Syria. But Washington doesn’t appear to be listening: On Sunday, the US launched dozens of precision airstrikes against ISIS camps and operatives based in Central Syria, according to US Central Command.
And at a press conference on Sunday, US President Joe Biden not only took credit for helping topple the Assad regime through its sanctions against Syria and support for Israel’s efforts against Hezbollah, but he said the US will support Syria's neighbors, ensure stability in eastern Syria, protect against the Islamic State, and engage in a UN-led process to transition from Assad to an independent, sovereign Syria with a new constitution.
However, Washington will also “remain vigilant,” Biden added, noting that while the rebel groups that took down Assad “are saying the right things now,” the US “will assess not just their words but their actions.”
Ian Bremmer's Quick Take:
A Quick Take over the weekend. Yet again, because there is entirely too much blowing up around the world. Here, I want to focus on Syria where just a few hours ago Bashar Assad, the dictator, forced out, overthrown by a large number of militarily strong opposition forces led by the radical Islamist group HTS.
A lot to talk about here. This whole thing lasted less than two weeks, and initially the Russians and the Iranians provided military support for Assad, but his complete inability of his army to fight and offer resistance, and the distraction that the Russians have, they're stretched-thin from their fighting in Ukraine, from the Iranians providing support to resistance forces that are doing very badly against Israel, particularly Hezbollah and Lebanon, meant there wasn't all that much capacity, or even that much political will, to provide support. And so, Assad has been overthrown.
By itself that's good news, in the sense that this has been an incredibly repressive regime fighting initially a war against their own people. The pro-democracy movement that came out of the Arab Spring and has led to over 500,000 Syrians dead over the last decade, over 200,000 of them civilians, and some 6 million refugees, both fleeing into neighboring Arab states but also into Europe, into Turkey, and of course in Germany, which is part of the reason that Merkel ended up leaving her terms in ignominy. That is the initial background.
And there has been a lot of support for various opposition groups in Syria, from Turkey, most notably from the UAE, from Saudi Arabia, and from the United States, while the Assad government was being supported principally by the Russians in terms of air support, some intelligence, some cyber capabilities, and from the Iranians on the ground, particularly the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. And that was largely enough through the majority of this war. The rebel groups by 2018 had retreated into the northwest, this Idlib region. And by that point, the rebels that were left were mostly led by ISIS, and that meant a common enemy on the part of the United States.
And Turkey had turned from Assad to the proximate Syrian part of the war on terror. And if that had failed, it had the potential to turn Syria and neighboring Iraq into a terrorist state. ISIS lost that battle. Assad consolidated most of Syria under his regime. And then about four years ago, Turkey and Russia brokered a ceasefire in Idlib, which was at that point under opposition control.
That brings us to today, and to HTS, which stands for Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham. It's a former Al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria that has since formally cut their ties with the terrorists, but they're still called a terrorist organization, labeled one by the United States and its allies in NATO. And they are the de facto leader of the armed opposition and led the now ouster of Assad. Now, they've become kind of Hezbollah-like in the sense that they're providing a lot of Syrian citizens with government services. They've managed to coordinate rebels and eliminate infighting underneath that, and they've also promised to protect Syrian Christians and Muslim Alawites and have gotten the tacit support of the Turkish Erdoğan government, who basically gave them at least a blinking yellow if not a green light to go ahead and launch this war against Assad two weeks ago.
Now, having said all of that, the likelihood that they're going to run as a secular government, Syria, seems unlikely to me. This is, we're going from Assad to what is probably going to be a radical Islamist government that'll be repressive and that'll be deeply challenging. And so I don't think that is in any way, at least at this point, something that we can call a transition that's good news or that we shouldn't feel anxiety about. But what is clear is that the Iranians and Russians have lost. So the axis of resistance is not looking like much of an axis and it's not putting up very much resistance. The Russians, Putin has said nothing about this. He's not made a public statement, and that's not surprising. Frequently when he is surprised and he faces sudden embarrassing losses, he doesn't say anything about it to his people. And if you look at Russian state media, they've been talking about France, and South Korea, and Trump, and all those things, but almost no coverage of Syria, where the Russians have lost an ally and they've lost a military base that's important to them in Tartus and they've not been able to put up much of a fight.
Now, the good news there is that if you're Putin, you should be more cognizant of the fact that there are major costs of continuing to fight an incredibly bloody war in Ukraine where you're making some gains, territorially, but you're losing huge numbers of Russian citizens. And so if Trump is coming in and says he wants to cut a deal, Putin should be more incented to do that. There's also good news on the Iranian front in the sense that Syria falling means that they no longer have a corridor to provide military support for Hezbollah. And that means that the two-month ceasefire, which has been announced by the Israelis and by the Lebanese government, is more likely to hold.
Now, if you put those two things together, kind of interesting. Looks more likely that Trump gets inaugurated, and he is indeed able to announce that the temporary ceasefire becomes a permanent end of the war between Israel and Hezbollah, and that he's able to negotiate a ceasefire between the Russians and Ukrainians that does not give up the store to Putin. The former is an easier bet than the latter, but both of them certainly look more likely on the back of Assad being ousted.
The bad news? More challenges, more humanitarian degradation for the Syrian people on the ground. Could easily see another million refugees on the back of the fighting that we've had, depending on what happens with governance going forward. There are very few hospitals that are presently functioning. There is very limited humanitarian aid on the ground, that's necessary in very short order. And it's hard to say that fighting isn't going to break out amongst the various factions that have held together in fighting a common enemy, if that's going to lead to coherent governance going forward, it depends so much on what happens when HTS becomes not the leader of a rebel group but suddenly is responsible for governance on the ground in Syria. And your guess is as good as anyone as to what is going to happen there.
So, that is the best I can tell where we are right now. It's a fascinating issue and a temporary expansion of the war in the Middle East, but hopefully one that we can see bringing a little bit of stability to some other conflicts that are happening in the region and more broadly. That's it for me, and I'll talk to you all real soon.
- Podcast: Syria, The Rise and Fallout of the House of Assad with Sam Dagher ›
- Syrian rebels reignite war, make advances in Aleppo ›
- Once frozen out, Bashar Assad is back in ›
- Do strikes on Syria signal a bolder Netanyahu? ›
- The Graphic Truth: How a decade of war has crushed Syria ›
- Tragedy upon tragedy in war-torn Syria ›
Romania’s highest court on Friday scrapped the results of the first round presidential contest, citing evidence that an outside state actor – widely understood to be the Kremlin – had orchestrated a TikTok campaign in favor of the first place finisher, far-right ultranationalist Calin Georgescu.
Georgescu, an eccentric, little-known former soil scientist who pledged to end Romania’s support for Ukraine and questioned the value of Romania’s membership in NATO and the EU, surged in popularity while campaigning almost entirely on social media. He took 23% of the vote in the first round on Nov. 24, besting pro-European centrist Elena Lasconi by four points. The runoff was supposed to take place this Sunday.
The move to cancel the vote came after a few days of uncertainty. The court first ruled the results were legitimate, only to reverse course after declassified Romanian intelligence documents suggested Georgescu was unfairly helped by hundreds of thousands TikTok posts, coordinated from abroad.
The documents also said attackers based in dozens of countries had launched tens of thousands of attempts to hack election infrastructure but did not say whether any had been successful.
TikTok has denied it gave any preferential treatment to Georgescu, and Russia has rejected allegations it had anything to do with the issue. The EU, meanwhile, has ordered the company to freeze and hand over all data pertaining to the Romanian election.
This is a first, and a potentially significant one. While concerns about misinformation and election meddling are widespread these days, no other democracy, to our knowledge, has canceled an election result outright over social media posts or allegations of foreign meddling.
Flagging the risky precedent of the move, Lasconi herself, who lost to Georgescu in the first round, said “Whether we like it or not, from a legal and legitimate point of view, nine million Romanian citizens, both in the country and in the diaspora, have expressed their preference for a certain candidate. We cannot ignore their will!”
What happens next?
Romania, a key NATO partner that shares a border with Ukraine, is now in a moment of significant institutional uncertainty.
This Sunday’s runoff has now been canceled, and the government must start the entire election over again from scratch. Romanian law suggests that could happen as soon as Dec. 22. It is unclear whether Georgescu will be permitted to run at all.
Earlier this year, Romanian courts banned pro-Russian, far-right European Parliament MP Diana Sosoaca from running in the presidential election, saying her criticisms of NATO and the EU were at odds with Romania’s founding documents.