Trending Now
We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for Eurasia Group and its affiliates, including GZERO Media, to clarify the types of data we collect, how we collect it, how we use data and with whom we share data. By using our website you consent to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, including the transfer of your personal data to the United States from your country of residence, and our use of cookies described in our Cookie Policy.
Science & Tech
Bill Dally, Yann LeCun, and Yoshua Bengio, QEPrize, The Mall, London.
Seven AI pioneers on Tuesday took home the 2025 Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering, a top award for groundbreaking innovations in science and engineering. Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, John Hopfield, Yann LeCun, Jensen Huang, Bill Dally, and Fei-Fei Li share this year’s prize for their contributions to the field of machine learning.
Bengio (Mila Quebec AI Institute), Hinton (Vector Institute), Hopfield (Princeton), and LeCun (NYU and Meta) won for their work on artificial neural networks, which help computers learn by mimicking the way the human brain works. These scholars have been awarded before. Hopfield and Hinton shared the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics for this achievement; meanwhile, Bengio, Hinton, and LeCun shared the 2018 Turing Award.
Huang and Dally of Nvidia won for their graphics processing units, the computer chip architecture that enables machine learning models and applications. Li, a professor at Stanford, won for the database ImageNet that helped train computer vision models.
“This year’s winning innovation is a groundbreaking advancement that impacts everyone, yet the full extent of its underlying engineering remains largely unrecognized, making it an especially exciting choice,” said Dame Lynn Gladden, who chaired the judging panel for the award.Cabs drive along Westminster Bridge in front of the British Parliament with the Elizabeth Tower and the famous Big Ben bell.
The United Kingdom is set to unveil the world’s first national law criminalizing the use of artificial intelligence tools for generating child sex abuse material, or CSAM.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said in a Sunday BBC interview that AI is leading to “online child abuse on steroids.” A series of four laws will, among other things, make it illegal to possess, create, or distribute AI tools designed to make CSAM, which would carry a maximum five-year prison sentence. The government will also criminalize running websites where abusers can share this material or advice about cultivating it.
The Internet Watch Foundation, which focuses on eliminating CSAM on the internet, issued a new report on Sunday showing that AI-generated CSAM found online has quadrupled over the past year.
The United States criminalizes CSAM, but there’s some gray area about whether AI-generated content is treated the same under federal law. In 2024, 18 states passed laws specifically outlawing AI-generated CSAM, but so far there’s no federal law on the books.OpenAI logo seen on screen with ChatGPT website displayed on mobile seen in this illustration.
OpenAI said that its models will be used to accelerate scientific research into disease prevention, cybersecurity, mathematics, and physics.
The agreement comes just days after OpenAI announced ChatGPT Gov, a version of the popular chatbot specifically designed for government personnel. The company is the face of the Project Stargate data center and AI infrastructure initiative heralded by President Donald Trump in January.Lettering on a logo of the European Union, AI-Act, the symbolic image for the laws and regulation of artificial intelligence in Europe.
As of Sunday, companies in Europe cannot legally use AI for facial recognition, emotion detecting, or scoring social behavior. The penalty is steep: up to $36 million in fines or 7% of global annual revenue.
The AI Act was formally adopted in September after years of deliberation in the European Union’s deliberative bodies. This is the first major government to bring comprehensive AI regulation to bear, and the rest of the law’s provisions will roll out over the next year and a half.
Europe had already gone much further on AI safety than the US federal government under Joe Biden, but with Donald Trump in office — who recently scrapped Biden’s safety-focused AI executive order — the gap in regulation between America and Europe promises to be even greater.
Trump has vowed to retaliate against the EU over the AI Act, which he previously called a “form of taxation,” but that threat wasn’t enough to deter Brussels from plowing ahead.Hard Numbers: OpenAI monster funding round, Meta’s glasses sales, Teens fall for AI too, The Beatles win at the Grammys, Anthropic’s move to reduce jailbreaking
Open AI CEO Sam Altman, left, and SoftBank Group CEO Masayoshi Son attend a marketing event in Tokyo, Japan, on Feb. 3, 2025.
1 million: Meta said that it sold 1 million units of its AI-enabled Ray-Ban smart glasses in 2024. It’s the first time the company has revealed sales numbers for its glasses, which retail between $299-$379.
35: Even young people get tricked by AI. A new report from Common Sense Media, a nonprofit advocacy group, found that 35% of teenagers aged 13–18 self-report being deceived by fake content online, including AI-generated media.
8: The Beatles won their eighth competitive Grammy Award on Sunday for the AI-assisted song “Now and Then.” A production team used AI to turn an unreleased John Lennon demo from the late 1970s into a polished track.
95: Anthropic announced a new “constitutional classifiers” system that in a test was 95% effective in blocking users from eliciting harmful content from its Claude models — up from 14% without the classifiers. Similar to the “prompt shields” Microsoft introduced last year, this is the latest effort to reduce “jailbreaking,” where users coerce AI models into ignoring their own content rules.Before DeepSeek released its R1 model last month, America’s long-term AI dominance felt like a sure thing.
DeepSeek is a Chinese startup, born from a hedge fund, that claims to have used a fraction of the computing power of US competitors while making an artificial intelligence model that rivals the best that Northern California’s labs have to offer. Critics have alleged that the company has been dishonest about claims it only spent $6 million training the model. But for anyone taking DeepSeek at face value, it has been a revelation that sent shockwaves not only through Silicon Valley but also through Wall Street and Washington.
The Biden administration spent the past few years clamping down on powerful US-made chips flowing into China, but evidently, DeepSeek figured out how to build a great model with a dearth of high-tech resources.
“It shines a spotlight on the limits of the US export control system,” said Xiaomeng Lu, geo-technology director of Eurasia Group. “Technology has evolved in a way that regulators failed to anticipate.”
“Necessity is the mother of invention” – that’s how Jack Corrigan of Georgetown’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology put it. “US efforts to hobble China’s AI sector created a need for Chinese developers to innovate a more efficient approach to AI.”
But DeepSeek’s impact goes beyond its own efficiency. It’s an open-source model, meaning its code is available for anyone to use and modify. “Due to the open-source nature of their model, it will be much harder to restrict access to it entirely,” said Valerie Wirtschafter, a fellow at the Brookings Institution. “The other more pragmatic question is whether Congress has the appetite for more whack-a-mole-style tech regulations, given the chaos that has unfolded since the passage of the TikTok ban.”
US government agencies such as NASA and the Navy have banned DeepSeek models on their devices, as did Congress, but there’s been no US effort to try and ban it more widely among the public, as Italy did on Thursday, citing unresolved data privacy concerns. And America’s top cloud providers, including Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services, have already added access to R1.
Justin Sherman, founder of Global Cyber Strategies, says that the Trump administration has a toolbox to “screen, restrict, and even expel non-US tech from the US tech supply chain on national security grounds,” particularly through the Commerce Department’s Information and Communications Technology and Services. Still, he cautions against letting “stock market temperaments, reductive China panic in Washington, and media overinflation of industry AI claims” steer nuanced policy decisions.
DeepSeek’s true threat is likely strategic rather than technical. “DeepSeek’s latest model raises the question of what happens if China becomes the leader in providing publicly available, freely downloadable AI models,” said Sam Winter-Levy, a fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “While the US is obsessed with the race to see who can build the single biggest and most powerful model, perhaps even artificial general intelligence, the Chinese might win the race to see who can build really useful and cost-effective models that will be used by people and companies around the world.” At a minimum, China’s overnight success has quickly leveled the playing field for US-China competition over technology.
Perhaps then the answer to DeepSeek requires a rethinking of what American dominance in AI really means. Banning any specific app or model would just be a Band-Aid on a bullet wound.
Ian Bremmer shares his insights on global politics this week on World In :60.
How is China's AI app DeepSeek disrupting the AI industry?
It certainly seems to be making people concerned that the Chinese are a lot closer to the Americans and the Trump administration is not sleeping on this. They clearly feel that China is technologically very capable, very advanced. Frankly, different than Biden felt when he first became president, though he got up to speed on that pretty quickly. And I think that's going to lead to a much tougher competition between the United States and China. Those that think that a deal is coming, that Trump is going to engage with China because he wants to find a way to not have to put tariffs on, I don't think that's going to happen because you're going to have so much more efforts to contain the Chinese in all sorts of areas of advanced technology broadly speaking.
They are way ahead in data. The Americans are ahead in compute, and they're both going to lean into the opportunities that they have. And the Americans are going to use their firepower from a government perspective with other countries around the world as well. That's what I think.
Trump has issued a 90-day pause on nearly all US foreign aid. What's the likelihood it'll be extended beyond that?
I don't know how long it's going to be extended, but I do know that so many of the contractors that are involved, for example, USAID, which is like half of their capable workforce, are gone. And within 30 days they then lose their security clearances and they're not going to have capability to execute. So I think there will be permanent damage to the ability of the Americans to actually get a lot of development programs done around the world, and this is an important piece of US soft power.
And if the Americans aren't doing it, other countries around the world will, most particularly China,. This is an opportunity for the Chinese to have more influence, especially in the Global South than the United States. And this is pennywise and pound foolish for the Americans. And unlike the suspension of domestic support and funding and programs, which led to a whole bunch of outrage and then the order was rescinded, on foreign aid there's not a lot of domestic outrage. And companies don't want to stick their necks out because they think that they're going to get whacked hard by the Trump administration. So, I think it's more likely to have a longer-term impact.
What do I make of the Rwandan-backed rebels' advancements in Congo?
Definitely it is expanding the civil war. A lot of Congolese are really unhappy that this is happening with the support of external actors. You've seen a bunch of embassies in Congo ransacked, a lot of riots as a consequence, and not a lot of interest in trying to resolve the problem other than from folks like the United Nations who are pretty weak on the ground. So like we're seeing in Sudan, in Congo, an expanding civil war that is causing a lot of humanitarian hardship and havoc. That's it for me, and I'll talk to you all real soon.