Europe's China Tech Conundrum

Last week in Signal, we looked at how the US is increasing pressure on the Chinese tech giant Huawei as part of a broader push to address national security concerns around China's technology ambitions.

But the tech cold war isn't just a US-China thing. Europe has been dragged into the conflict, too, and it's facing some tough choices about how to respond.

Just take the example of its decision about whether to work with Huawei.


Quick background: The US has effectively banned Huawei from building its sensitive data networks, and it's pushing Europe to take similar steps. It's concerned that a Chinese presence in Europe's 5G infrastructure could give Beijing new ways to spy or even shut down important systems. But while European allies like the UK, Germany, and Poland share some of the US's security concerns, their calculations are more challenging.

Europe faces three big dilemmas:

First, unlike in the US, where Huawei has virtually zero share of the market, the Chinese company already has a big footprint in existing European data networks – especially in the UK and Germany.

Second, although freezing out Huawei would satisfy Europe's main security partner, it would simultaneously antagonize its second-biggest trading partner.

Third, shunning China's relatively less expensive networking gear would be costly. The extra time and expense required to build a China-free network could delay the rollout of innovative new technologies like advanced manufacturing that will run on top of new, ultra-fast 5G data connections.

Which way will the Europeans go? They could ban Huawei outright and risk China's ire. They could allow Huawei into their networks, perhaps under tightened scrutiny, reasoning that the commercial advantages outweigh the national security risks. Or they could seek safety in numbers by pushing the EU to agree to a bloc-wide policy on Chinese telecom suppliers.

The debate over how to proceed is likely to rage in Europe's capitals in the coming weeks and months. The answer will not only have important commercial implications but could also determine Europe's long-term geopolitical allegiance.

Wrecking the global economy's hopes for a relaxing late-August Friday, China and the US have taken fresh shots at each other in their deepening trade war.

First, China announced new tariffs on US goods in response to US levies on China's exports that are set to take effect next month.

Trump responded with a vintage tweet storm, lashing out at China and demanding that US firms stop doing business there. The Dow plunged as markets waited for the next shoe to drop. And drop it did: later in the day Trump announced higher tariffs on nearly everything that China exports to the United States.

Why now? Bear in mind, all of this comes right as Trump is leaving for this weekend's G7 summit in France. That gathering already promised to be a testy one – but with the global economy slowing, the impact of Trump's increasingly nasty trade war with China will add fresh tensions to the occasion.

So where are we in the trade war now? Here is an updated list of what measures each side has imposed to date, and what's next. Both sides have a lot at stake, but from the looks of it, the list isn't going to get shorter any time soon.

When Donald Trump first started talking about buying Greenland last week, we figured it was a weird story with less legs than a Harp seal.

Signal readers, we were wrong. President Trump was so serious about purchasing the autonomous Danish territory that this week he abruptly cancelled a trip to Denmark after the country's prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, labelled the idea "absurd."

More Show less

The Amazon in flames – More than 70,000 forest fires are burning in Brazil right now, most of them in the Amazon. That's up 84% over the same period last year, and it's the highest number on record. This is the dry season when farmers burn certain amounts of forest legally to clear farmland. But critics say Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro's efforts to loosen conservation rules have encouraged farmers, loggers, and miners to set more fires, many of them illegally. Bolsonaro – a science skeptic who recently fired the head of the agency that tracks deforestation – says, without proof, that NGOs are setting the fires to embarrass his government. Meanwhile, the EU is holding up a major trade deal with Brazil unless Bolsonaro commits to higher environmental protection standards, including those that affect the Amazon.

More Show less

Over the past fifty years, the Amazon rainforest has shrunk by an area equal to the size of Turkey. In the 1960s and 1970s, the Brazilian government supported settlement of the sparsely populated region for security reasons. Since then, huge swaths of the forest -- which is crucial for limiting the world's greenhouse gasses -- have been cleared for farmland used to feed Brazil's population and support its massive agricultural exports. Greater awareness of the environmental impacts in the 1990s produced tighter conservation regulations, though plenty of illegal clearing continues. In recent years, the annual deforestation rate has begun to rise again, and Brazil's new president Jair Bolsonaro has pledged to weaken regulations further in order to support businesses.