We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for Eurasia Group and its affiliates, including GZERO Media, to clarify the types of data we collect, how we collect it, how we use data and with whom we share data. By using our website you consent to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, including the transfer of your personal data to the United States from your country of residence, and our use of cookies described in our Cookie Policy.
{{ subpage.title }}
Applicants looking at job offers displayed on a glass window of a recruitment agency in Manila, Philippines.
Remittances We’re Watching: OFW superheroes, Central America flows, Ukraine war
The Philippines: From remittances to migrant worker superpower?
Being an Overseas Filipino Worker is nothing to sneeze at. When OFWs, as they're popularly known, go home for Christmas carrying huge cardboard boxes of gifts, they have a dedicated customs line and huge billboards thanking them for doing such a good job. Why? Because the remittances they send make up almost 10% of GDP. What's more, the Philippine labor diaspora is among the world’s biggest at 10% of the population — and a prized voting bloc. That’s why President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. spent almost as much time visiting OFWs in the US and the Gulf as he did on the domestic campaign trail. It paid off: Marcos killed it with OFWs, who helped him last May win a plurality of the vote for the first time since his authoritarian dad was in charge. Now, Marcos Jr. wants OFWs to play an even bigger role in his administration. For one thing, he’s asking them to go beyond remittances and actually invest in crucial business sectors such as tourism. For another, Marcos thinks the Philippines can punch above its tiny diplomatic weight by leveraging the power of its huge expat workforce to achieve political goals like trade deals. If a pandemic-era deployment ban on Filipino nurses worsened a global shortage, imagine what would happen to the shipping industry if Manila called back a quarter of the world's seafarers.
How pandemic and inflation impacted remittances to Central America
Lockdowns in the US had a disruptive effect on many Latin American countries that rely on remittances from the US to keep their economies afloat. Border closures and a stagnant US economy in the first half of 2020 caused remittances to drop, with outflows to Mexico, Guatemala, and Honduras contracting (year on year) in April 2020 by 3%, 20%, and 28% respectively. That trend reversed course in the second half of 2020 as the US entered the “we have to learn to live with it” stage of the pandemic. Remittances strengthened further in 2021 as the US economy came roaring back. Surging demand coupled with the Biden administration’s $1.9 trillion stimulus package led to record levels of remittances to Latin American countries, where pandemic-related economic disruptions remained rampant. Remittances to Mexico grew 27%, while Guatemalan migrants sent 35% more back. Payments to Honduras and El Salvador, meanwhile, grew 26%. We’ll be watching to see whether these outflows recede as the US Federal Reserve doubles down on efforts to rein in soaring US inflation. What’s more, inflation in the receiving countries – the annual rate in August was at 8.7% in Mexico, 10.4% in Honduras, and 8.4% in Guatemala – means that whatever is sent home will be worth less.
Ukraine: War and remittances
The war in Ukraine has sent a shockwave through the normal patterns of remittance flows in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. To start with, consider that Ukraine counts on remittances for 10% of its GDP, most of that coming from Poland and the US. Russia, meanwhile, is home to millions of migrant workers from countries in the Caucasus and Central Asia, some of which depend on remittances for nearly a third of GDP. When the war started, remittances to Ukraine skyrocketed as Ukrainians living abroad sent money home to loved ones in danger and global platforms cut fees for money transfers. Since then, flows have tailed off, in part because millions of Ukrainians have fled, meaning transfers now reach them in other countries. At the same time, Western sanctions on Russia reverberated into Central Asia. First, the hit to Russia’s economy pushed hundreds of thousands of migrant workers to head home. Second, financial sanctions complicated Russian banks’ ability to send money across borders. In Kyrgyzstan alone, for example, remittances fell by 20% after the war started, and the World Bank has warned that the decline could push the poverty rate to 38% of the population, up from 20% in 2019.The Graphic Truth: Sending money home
Migrants leave their countries of origin not only to find work opportunities — the hard-earned money they send back helps keep the lights on back home. After a COVID-related blip in 2020 – which saw a small decline but defied disastrous predictions – global remittances sent by migrants to relatives in their countries of origin are again on the upswing. That’s a big deal for the migrants’ families and for governments of nations who rely on that revenue to keep the economy from collapsing. We take a look at the countries that send and receive the most migrant cash, those that most depend on remittances, and how inflows have performed recently.