Telling Taiwan "Biden is your guy" (instead of Trump) doesn't make sense

Would Joe Biden be better for Taiwan than Donald Trump? Global affairs columnist Frida Ghitis says he would be, in an op-ed entitled "Can Taiwan Survive a Second Trump Term?" in Washington Post Opinions and Outlook, but the reality is more complicated. Ian Bremmer and Eurasia Group's Kelsey Broderick explain why in the latest edition of The Red Pen.


As you know, there's been a lot of international attention on Hong Kong as Beijing continues to take steps to erode democracy there. They've implemented a new national security law that basically ends the "One State, Two Systems" agreement, they had there. But Taiwan is very different. An island off China's coast that has its own government. Beijing would very much like full control there. Ghitis is arguing that as the United States continues to retreat on the global stage in the Trump presidency, Taiwan will become increasingly vulnerable. And she draws the conclusion that overall a Biden presidency would be much better for Taiwan.

Now, is that true? Well, not to sound like your Facebook relationship status, but it's complicated.

Let's look at the points she makes to support the argument.

First, Ghitis writes that Trump has a long track record of lavishing praise on President Xi, calling him a "friend of mine" and an "incredible guy." And paying little attention to matters other than trade.

Actually, Trump has said all those things, but the Trump administration has ramped up defense of non-Chinese claims in the South China Sea and they've taken fairly serious economic steps to punish China for their actions in Hong Kong. So, while Trump has praised Xi Jinping personally, he's also driven the most anti-China-US policy in decades. And directly, the Trump administration has flooded Taiwan with arms to defend itself, much more than what we saw under the Obama administration. So, leading international opposition to Chinese policies has arguably been the most successful and most widely supported part of Trump's foreign policy.

Next, Ghitis writes that since China is "increasingly willing to flout international views" on issues ranging from Hong Kong to Xinjiang (where a million ethnic Uighurs, a Muslim minority in China, are being held in essentially concentration camps, they call them "re-education camps"), it might just make a move on Taiwan.

Now these, in my view, really aren't accurate comparisons. China is aggressive, yes. Reckless? No. Hong Kong and Xinjiang are already part of China. The US has a 40+ year commitment to defending Taiwan. Really hard to make that comparison.

Finally, the punchline: "Biden looks like a safer bet than Trump for the survival of Taiwan's independence."

Maybe. But the truth is, no US president would be eager for a war with China, even to defend Taiwan. If anything, Biden is more likely to ease up the pressure a bit on China and take a less militaristic approach to foreign policy. There is no indication that Biden is changing the US's fundamental approach of strategic ambiguity that has guided US foreign policy on this issue. In other words, "Defending Taiwan at all costs" is not going to be one of Biden's talking points.

So, I mean, I understand that a lot of people are really angry at President Trump for a lot of mistakes in domestic and foreign policy, but saying that suddenly "Biden is your guy, Taiwan," that doesn't make an awful lot of sense here. That's your Red Pen for this week.

That's Bank of America's new target in its Environmental Business Initiative in order to accelerate the transition to a low-carbon, sustainable economy.

Here's how it will drive innovation to address climate change.

On Tuesday, a major US intelligence report said the top threat to America right now is China. A day later, John Kerry, the Biden administration's "climate czar," got on a plane to... China.

Such is the drama of ties between the world's two largest economies these days.

More Show less

More than a dozen COVID-19 vaccines have been fully approved or are currently in early use globally, and COVAX, the global initiative started last year by the World Health Organization and other partners, is pushing for equitable access to vaccines for all. But most of the half billion jabs given so far have gone to citizens of wealthy countries, with half going to the US and China alone. What's the problem with so-called vaccine nationalism? Ian Bremmer explains that besides the clear humanitarian concerns, the continued global spread of COVID increases the risk of new mutations and variants that can threaten the entire world, vaccinated or not.

Watch the episode: Vaccine nationalism could prolong the pandemic

Should wealthy individuals and nations shoulder more of the burden in addressing climate change? Pulitzer Prize-winning climate journalist Elizabeth Kolbert argues that Big Tech leaders like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk should shift more of their focus to fighting for our own planet's survival, instead of space exploration. "We're doing as much as we can to make life difficult on planet Earth for ourselves. But there's virtually nothing we could do to make it as difficult as life on Mars, where there's, among other things, no oxygen." Kolbert, the author of Under a White Sky, discusses why it's so crucial for a few rich countries to bear most of the climate burden, since they're also the biggest emitters. Her conversation with Ian Bremmer is featured in the upcoming episode of GZERO World, airing on US public television stations starting this Friday, April 16. Check local listings.

In recent days, Northern Ireland has seen some of its worst street violence in over a decade. The anger has subsided a bit this week, but post-Brexit fears leave many uncertain about their future in a deeply divided land with a long history of political violence between Irish republicans and UK unionists.

More Show less

Fighting climate change is about making the planet get less hot. The more quickly countries slow down their carbon emissions, the faster that'll happen. All the more important for the nations that pollute the most — but not all of them are on board. Although the majority, including China, are setting future targets to go Net Zero, India doesn't want to commit (yet) to when to stop burning fossil fuels to spur economic growth. We take a look at when the world's top polluting economies intend to go carbon-neutral, compared with their share of global emissions, of renewable energy as a source of electricity, and percentage of global coal consumption.

Peruvian runoff: Perú's presidential election is going to a runoff in June between two surprise and polarizing contenders, each of whom won less than 20 percent of votes in a highly fragmented first round. Pedro Castillo, a far-left union leader and teacher who benefited from a late surge in the polls, will battle rightwing populist Keiko Fujimori, daughter of the country's imprisoned former strongman. Castillo wants to rewrite the constitution to weaken the political influence of the country's business elite and maybe to allow the state to nationalize parts of the mining sector to pay for social programs for the poor. Fujimori wants to use mining revenues to create jobs by investing in infrastructure and healthcare. The runoff will probably be a national referendum on Fujimori, a divisive figure running for the top job for the third time. No Peruvian president has ever left office without facing corruption charges, but Fujimori already faces several — and she'll avoid jail time if she wins.

More Show less

900 million: Egypt has impounded the Ever Given, the ship that recently blocked the Suez Canal for almost a week, until its owners pay some $900 million in compensation for losses and the cost of the rescue operation. The blockage of this major naval chokepoint caused severe disruption to the global maritime shipping industry.

More Show less

Subscribe to GZERO Media's newsletter, Signal

The GZERO World Podcast with Ian Bremmer. Listen now.

GZEROMEDIA

Subscribe to GZERO Media's newsletter: Signal