Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

The Red Pen

On GZERO Media's series The Red Pen, Ian Bremmer and colleagues pick apart the argument in a major opinion piece.

Presented by

An op-ed in the New York Times says that the US coronavirus response under President Trump was mediocre, but not catastrophic, when compared to the response of other countries. But the "peer country" examples selected by columnist Ross Douthat don't paint an accurate picture. Ian Bremmer and Eurasia Group analyst Scott Rosenstein take issue with Douthat's argument in this edition of The Red Pen (where we keep op-eds honest).

Today, we're taking our red pen to a recent piece from New York Times columnist Ross Douthat. The title is provocative, "How Many Lives Would a More Normal President Have Saved?" It sounds like Douthat is about to go big on the failure of President Trump's response to the pandemic. But no, that's just the headline. In reality, what he's saying is it isn't a catastrophe and may end up just being, meh, especially when you compare the US to peer nations. Not so fast, Ross. Let's break down the argument and get out the red pen.

Keep reading...Show less

More from The Red Pen

GZERO Series

How October 7 changed the Middle East, three years on

GZERO World with Ian Bremmer

GZERO World with Ian Bremmer
Russia-Ukraine ceasefire posted

Puppet Regime

Puppet Regime
Trump's Russian diesel deal and what it means for Ukraine

Quick Take

Quick Take
AI, capitalism, and who pays the price

ask ian

ask ian
The US-China battle for global dominance

Ian Explains

Ian Explains
Why the 2026 UN Water Conference is focused on action, not talk

GZERO Reports

GZERO Reports
Trump climbs down on Greenland

GZERO Europe

GZERO Europe
Could Trump’s foreign policy sink the GOP?

The Debrief

The Debrief