<p><strong>Western Sahara shake-up: </strong>President Trump announced Thursday that the US had successfully brokered another <a href="https://www.axios.com/morocco-israel-deal-trump-recognize-western-sahara-a8685253-2b7b-4682-88c9-f3b85bbede68.html?stream=world&utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=alerts_world" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">détente </a>between Israel and a former Arab foe as part of the <a href="https://www.state.gov/the-abraham-accords/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Abraham Accords</a>, this time with the Kingdom of Morocco. The two states once enjoyed solid diplomatic relations; however, ties were severed in 2000 amid the bloody <a href="https://www.haaretz.com/misc/tags/TAG-intifada-1.5599095" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Second Intifada between Israelis and Palestinians.</a> So, what does each camp gain from this normalization deal? For the Israelis, it's yet another success in gaining formal recognition from prominent players in the Arab world, helping to boost its security and economic prospects in the region. It also helps Israel create a united bulwark against Iran, a mutual foe. For the Trump administration, the deal presents an opportunity to boast of another foreign policy triumph on its way out the door. But the biggest winner is Morocco: in exchange for agreeing to establish ties with Israel, the US reversed decades of foreign policy by ignoring a long-standing UN resolution and formally recognizing Moroccan control over the contested Western Sahara, where <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/13/world/middleeast/morocco-military-operation-western-sahara.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">violence recently flared</a> between Moroccan forces and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/23/world/fighting-is-long-over-but-western-sahara-still-lacks-peace.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Sahrawi nomads</a> from the Polisario Front liberation movement who have long been fighting for independence on territory claimed by Rabat. This shake-up comes as the Western Sahara is already plagued by <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-52614579" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">instability </a>and violence.</p><p><strong>Lebanon's PM charged with negligence</strong>: Lebanon's former Prime Minister Hassan Diab, along with three veteran ministers, has been <a href="https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/12/10/lebanon-pm-former-ministers-charged-over-beirut-blast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">charged with negligence</a> over the <a href="https://www.gzeromedia.com/whats-next-for-lebanon" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_self">Beirut port explosion</a> back in August that killed over 200 people, injured 6,000, and caused far-reaching damage to the capital. Diab, whose government resigned after the disaster but has served in a caretaker capacity in recent months, says that his "conscious is clean:" The former PM says that he was made aware of the explosives (nearly 3,000 tons of material) at the port in June, but that his response was hampered by inconsistent and poor warnings from relevant government agencies. Diab's camp has made clear that it will not cooperate with the courts, saying that the matter should have been handled by parliament, which has a specialized court system for trialing top government officials. To date, 37 people are being prosecuted for the devastating blast that <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/how-the-beirut-explosion-will-worsen-lebanons-crises/2020/08/14/67547828-dde3-11ea-b4f1-25b762cdbbf4_story.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">worsened</a> Lebanon's longtime economic and political crises.<br/></p>
Read Now
Show less