China Tariffs: A New Price For Patriotism

President Trump yesterday followed through on his threat to impose tariffs on another $200 billion worth of Chinese exports to the United States. A 10 percent levy will go into effect immediately, rising to 25 percent on 1 January 2019. China, undeterred by Trump’s willingness to up the ante, has already pledged to retaliate. A negotiated compromise to end the US-China trade war looks as far off as ever.

This round of tariffs puts a new group of people on the front lines of that war: a broad swathe of American consumers. Trump’s earlier rounds of China tariffs – which are meant to force China to stop unfairly subsidizing its own companies while extracting technology from foreign ones – focused largely on industrial equipment purchased by American firms.

But the new measures include things like Chinese-made computers, furniture, home appliances, and food products that ordinary Americans purchase in large quantities. Industry organizations and consumer advocates have warned that these tariffs could cost jobsreduce economic growth, and erode living standards, particularly for middle class and lower-income people, who tend to spend more of their income on imported goods.  By one official estimate, cheaper imported goods account for more than a quarter of the American middle class’s purchasing power.

In practice, the new tariffs may not show up fully in the price of your (or your American friends’) next vacuum or laptop – in part because many suppliers will be able to source things from countries other than China (and also partly why Trump’s focus on China may not affect the overall US trade deficit.)

But it does raise an important question for an American society that has gotten very used to cheap consumer goods from China over the past several decades. What price are people willing to pay in the name of economic nationalism and solidarity with domestic industries?

In 2012, the United States created the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program to protect these young people from being deported. Yet just five years later, the program was rescinded, putting close to 700,000 DACA recipients at risk of being banished from the only home they've ever known. More than five dozen of these DACA recipients at risk are Microsoft employees. These young people contribute to the company and serve its customers. They help create products, secure services, and manage finances. And like so many young people across our nation, they dream of making an honest living and a real difference in the communities in which they reside. Yet they now live in uncertainty.

Microsoft has told its Dreamers that it will stand up for them along with all the nation's DACA recipients. It will represent them in court and litigate on their behalf. That's why Microsoft joined Princeton University and Princeton student Maria De La Cruz Perales Sanchez to file one of the three cases challenging the DACA rescission that was heard on Nov. 12 by the United States Supreme Court.

Read more on Microsoft On The Issues.

In the predawn hours of Tuesday morning, Israel launched a precision attack in the Gaza Strip, targeting and killing a Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) commander. In response, the terror group fired more than 200 rockets at southern Israel. Exchanges of fire have brought cities on both sides of the Gaza border to a standstill and at least eight Palestinians are dead and dozens of Israelis wounded. With this latest escalation, Israel now faces national security crises on multiple fronts. Here's what's going on:

More Show less

More Brexit shenanigans: Britons this week saw Prime Minister and Conservative Party leader Boris Johnson endorse Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn in upcoming elections. As a special bonus, they got to see Corbyn return the favo(u)r with a formal endorsement of Johnson. Most viewers in the UK will have understood immediately that these are the latest example of "deep fakes," digitally manipulated video images. The more important Brexit story this week is a pledge by Nigel Farage that his Brexit Party will not run candidates in areas held by the Conservatives in upcoming national elections. That's a boost for Johnson, because it frees his party from having to compete for support from pro-Brexit voters in those constituencies.

More Show less

80: More than 80 percent of the electronic voting systems currently used in the US are made by just three companies, according to a new report which warns that they are regulated less effectively than "colored pencils."

More Show less

Are we going to learn anything new from public impeachment hearings?

No, but like with Mueller, you know, people weren't reading the transcript, but they did actually listen to Mueller when he gave his speech. Now, the question is: Are they going to take anything different away from the public impeachment hearings? And the answer is, yes. They'll take very different things away, if they're watching on Fox or if they're watching on MSNBC. Still deeply divided and still can't imagine senators on the GOP impeaching, slash, convicting President Trump.

More Show less