GZERO Media logo

INDIA’S “STATUE OF DISUNITY”

INDIA’S “STATUE OF DISUNITY”

Earlier this week, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi unveiled the world’s tallest statue in the northwest state of Gujarat. The “Statue of Unity,” which took 33 months to complete and cost more than $400 million, is a monument to Sardar Patel, one of India’s founding fathers. At 597 feet, it’s almost twice as tall as the US Statue of Liberty.


This feat couldn’t come at a more opportune moment for Mr. Modi—who’s gearing up for a re-election bid next year. He laid the first stone in the project as chief minister of Gujarat. With its completion, Prime Minister Modi is claiming a greater share in the country’s past and signaling his vision for its political future.

Here's Gabe Lipton with some color on the political significance of this monumental project…

A fight over history: It’s not unusual for politicians to reinterpret history to serve their goals. Modi’s challenge has always been to stake claim to the legacy of India’s independence in 1947 despite the reality that the leaders of the independence movement hailed from the party that now opposes him.

The construction of a statue of Patel, who served as the country’s first deputy prime minister, and Modi’s use of Gandhi’s signature wireframe glasses as the symbol for his “Clean India” program are both high-profile attempts to associate himself with India's most popular historical figures, even though they might have taken issue with his brand of religious-based nationalism.

A fight over identity: Ahead of elections next year, Modi is also looking to rally support around an identity-based vision of what it means to be a “real” Indian. In the figure of Patel, Modi spies a useful symbol. Patel, like Modi, came from humble origins. Unlike other leaders of India’s independence movement, he didn’t spend his formative years studying abroad in England or embrace leftist political beliefs.

Modi sees Patel as an ardent Hindu and nationalist, Carnegie Endowment scholar Milan Vashinav recently told me, a “true son of the soil.” But the opposition Congress party, of which Patel was a member, takes issue with Modi’s view and what it implies about the country’s direction. After a right-wing nationalist assassinated Gandhi, they point out, Patel outlawed the far-right group that gave birth to Modi’s BJP party.

A fight over the economy: The statue itself is also a sign of the mixed economic results of Modi's first term. When Modi was elected prime minister in 2014, he promised much-needed upgrades to India’s railways, roads, and rural infrastructure. He hasn’t delivered fully on that promise. Erecting the world’s largest statue is a useful way to burnish his credentials as a builder and dish out funds to a favorite locale.

The Congress party calls the project an “electoral stunt” with money that could have been spent to help the poor. Last year, Congress lost a tightly contested state election in Gujarat, where the "Statue of Unity" now stands. Modi’s case isn’t helped by the fact that a BJP-led state government elsewhere in India just started construction on an even larger statue that is expected to cost around $500 million.

India heads for elections next year as Sardar Patel looks on.

Carbon has a bad rep, but did you know it's a building block of life? As atoms evolved, carbon trapped in CO2 was freed, giving way to the creation of complex molecules that use photosynthesis to convert carbon to food. Soon after, plants, herbivores, and carnivores began populating the earth and the cycle of life began.

Learn more about how carbon created life on Earth in the second episode of Eni's Story of CO2 series.

As we enter the homestretch of the US presidential election — which is set to be the most contentious, and possibly contested, in generations — Americans are also voting on 35 seats up for grabs in a battle for the control of the Senate. The 100-member body is currently held 53-47 by the Republican Party, but many individual races are wide open, and the Democrats are confident they can flip the upper chamber of Congress.

Either way, the result will have a profound impact not only on domestic policy, but also on US foreign relations and other issues with global reach. Here are a few areas where what US senators decide reverberates well beyond American shores.

More Show less

On September 23, GZERO Media — in partnership with Microsoft and Eurasia Group — gathered global experts to discuss global recovery from the coronavirus pandemic in a livestream panel. Our panel for the discussion Crisis Response & Recovery: Reimagining while Rebuilding, included:

  • Brad Smith, President, Microsoft
  • Ian Bremmer, President and Founder, Eurasia Group & GZERO Media
  • Jeh Johnson, Partner, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP and former Secretary of Homeland Security.
  • John Frank, Vice President, UN Affairs at Microsoft
  • Susan Glasser, staff writer and Washington columnist, The New Yorker (moderator)

Special appearances by UN Secretary-General António Guterres, European Central Bank chief Christine Lagarde, and comedian/host Trevor Noah.

More Show less

Jon Lieber, who leads Eurasia Group's coverage of political and policy developments in Washington, offers insights on the Supreme Court vacancy:

Will Senate Republicans, who stopped a Supreme Court nomination in 2016, because it was too close to an election, pay a political price for the change in tactics this time around?

Not only do I think they won't pay a political price, I think in many cases, they're going to benefit. Changing the balance of power on the Supreme Court has been a career-long quest for many conservatives and many Republicans. And that's why you've seen so many of them fall in line behind the President's nomination before we even know who it is.

At this point, do Senate Democrats have any hope of stopping President Trump from filling the ninth seat on the Supreme Court?

More Show less

In a special GZERO Media livestream on global response and recovery amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Eurasia Group & GZERO Media president Ian Bremmer discussed the difference between Europe's unified approach to economic stimulus and the deeply divided and political nature of the current conversation in the US. While initial stimulus support was bipartisan, there is little chance of Democrats and Republicans coming together again ahead of the November 3 presidential election. "It's red state versus blue state. President Trump's saying that coronavirus isn't so bad if you take the blue states out. He's president of the blue states, you can't take the blue states out," Bremmer told moderator Susan Glasser of The New Yorker.

UNGA banner

GZEROMEDIA

Subscribe to GZERO Media's Newsletter: Signal

Panel: How will the world recover from COVID-19?

UNGA Livestream