INDIA’S “STATUE OF DISUNITY”

INDIA’S “STATUE OF DISUNITY”

Earlier this week, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi unveiled the world’s tallest statue in the northwest state of Gujarat. The “Statue of Unity,” which took 33 months to complete and cost more than $400 million, is a monument to Sardar Patel, one of India’s founding fathers. At 597 feet, it’s almost twice as tall as the US Statue of Liberty.


This feat couldn’t come at a more opportune moment for Mr. Modi—who’s gearing up for a re-election bid next year. He laid the first stone in the project as chief minister of Gujarat. With its completion, Prime Minister Modi is claiming a greater share in the country’s past and signaling his vision for its political future.

Here's Gabe Lipton with some color on the political significance of this monumental project…

A fight over history: It’s not unusual for politicians to reinterpret history to serve their goals. Modi’s challenge has always been to stake claim to the legacy of India’s independence in 1947 despite the reality that the leaders of the independence movement hailed from the party that now opposes him.

The construction of a statue of Patel, who served as the country’s first deputy prime minister, and Modi’s use of Gandhi’s signature wireframe glasses as the symbol for his “Clean India” program are both high-profile attempts to associate himself with India's most popular historical figures, even though they might have taken issue with his brand of religious-based nationalism.

A fight over identity: Ahead of elections next year, Modi is also looking to rally support around an identity-based vision of what it means to be a “real” Indian. In the figure of Patel, Modi spies a useful symbol. Patel, like Modi, came from humble origins. Unlike other leaders of India’s independence movement, he didn’t spend his formative years studying abroad in England or embrace leftist political beliefs.

Modi sees Patel as an ardent Hindu and nationalist, Carnegie Endowment scholar Milan Vashinav recently told me, a “true son of the soil.” But the opposition Congress party, of which Patel was a member, takes issue with Modi’s view and what it implies about the country’s direction. After a right-wing nationalist assassinated Gandhi, they point out, Patel outlawed the far-right group that gave birth to Modi’s BJP party.

A fight over the economy: The statue itself is also a sign of the mixed economic results of Modi's first term. When Modi was elected prime minister in 2014, he promised much-needed upgrades to India’s railways, roads, and rural infrastructure. He hasn’t delivered fully on that promise. Erecting the world’s largest statue is a useful way to burnish his credentials as a builder and dish out funds to a favorite locale.

The Congress party calls the project an “electoral stunt” with money that could have been spent to help the poor. Last year, Congress lost a tightly contested state election in Gujarat, where the "Statue of Unity" now stands. Modi’s case isn’t helped by the fact that a BJP-led state government elsewhere in India just started construction on an even larger statue that is expected to cost around $500 million.

India heads for elections next year as Sardar Patel looks on.

A sector that's rapidly expanding, domotics - domus (home) plus robotics - are smart houses that manage temperature and lighting to minimize wasted electricity. For example, smart thermostats sense your presence and set the temperature according to your needs, saving 20% a year on heating bills. Watch this episode of Eni's Energy Shot series to learn how domotics save money and increase a home's value.

Even if the US, Europe, China, and India reduce carbon emissions at the rate they've promised, much climate damage has already been done. That shouldn't stop these and other countries from doing all they can to meet their net-zero emissions targets, but they also better start preparing for a world of people on the move.

Climate change will displace an unprecedented number of people in coming years, creating not just a series of humanitarian crises in many parts of the world, but lasting political, economic, and social upheaval as those of us who live on higher ground try to find a sustainable place for these climate refugees to live.

More Show less

When will it be safe for the world's children to be vaccinated against COVID-19? The World Health Organization's chief scientist, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, says that vaccines are being tested in children down to the age of six or even lower, and promises that data on children will be shared as soon as it's available. She also notes that there are not enough studies on transmission in schools, and the WHO has advised governments to prioritize schools "over other things like shopping malls or cinema halls or pubs." Dr. Swaminathan spoke with Ian Bremmer in an interview on GZERO World, airing on US public television stations starting April 9. Check local listings.

Watch the episode: Vaccine nationalism could prolong the pandemic

Over the past half century, climate change has had an immense impact on the farmers who produce the food we eat. A new study by Cornell University shows that global warming has knocked 21 percent off of global agriculture productivity growth since 1965, equivalent to seven years of normal growth if humans had not polluted the planet. But not all countries have been affected in the same say. Farmers in warmer parts of the world have been hit hard as conditions grow more arid, but sub-polar regions in Canada or Siberia are now actually better for agriculture because they are not as cold as they used to be. Here we take a look at how climate has affected farming productivity growth around the world.

On Tuesday, a major US intelligence report said the top threat to America right now is China. A day later, John Kerry, the Biden administration's "climate czar," got on a plane to... China.

Such is the drama of ties between the world's two largest economies these days.

More Show less

A Castro-less Cuba: Raúl Castro, younger brother of the late Fidel, is expected to retire on Friday as secretary-general of Cuba's ruling communist party. When he does, it'll mark the first time since the 1959 revolution that none of Cuba's leaders is named Castro. The development is largely symbolic since Castro, 89, handed over day-to-day affairs to President Miguel Díaz-Canel in 2018. It's worth noting that US sanctions laws do specify that one of the conditions for normalizing ties with Cuba is that any transitional government there cannot include either of the Castro brothers. So that's one less box to tick in case there is a future rapprochement across the Straits of Florida. But more immediately, we're watching to see whether a new generation of leaders headed by Díaz-Canel will bring any serious reforms to Cuba. COVID has killed the tourism industry, plunging the island into an economic crisis that's brought back food shortages and dollar stores reminiscent of the early 1990s.

More Show less

16: Brazil's new plan to save the Amazon promises to curb deforestation, but not too much. Although it would reduce annual forest loss to the average recorded over the past five years, next year's target is still 16 percent higher than the Amazon's total deforestation in 2018, the year before President Jair Bolsonaro — who favors economic development of the rainforest — took office.

More Show less

Should the Biden administration "reverse course on China" in the hope of establishing a friendlier relationship, as diplomat Kishore Mahbubani argues in a recent Financial Times op-ed? Ian Bremmer and Eurasia Group analyst Michael Hirson take out the Red Pen to explain why it's not that simple.

And today, we are talking about the United States and China. The relationship between the two most powerful nations in the world is the worst it's been since the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. Pundits and policymakers alike all around the world are trying to figure out how Washington and Beijing can at least stop the bleeding because a reset is nowhere in the cards.

That's the topic of the op-ed that we are looking at today. It's from the Financial Times, written by Singaporean diplomat Kishore Mahbubani, and the title summarizes the key argument: "Biden should summon the courage to reverse course on China." Meaning, he should throw out the Trump era approach and open the door to more cooperation and kinder, gentler relations.

More Show less

Subscribe to GZERO Media's newsletter, Signal

The GZERO World Podcast with Ian Bremmer. Listen now.

GZEROMEDIA

Subscribe to GZERO Media's newsletter: Signal