GZERO Media logo

US-China: My Way Or The Huawei

US-China: My Way Or The Huawei

Trade negotiations between the US and China took another step forward yesterday, with the Chinese taking steps to lower tariffs on US automobiles from 40 to 15 percent. The move further eases tensions after Presidents Trump and Xi declared a "trade truce" in Buenos Aires earlier this month.


In the background, though, a diplomatic and legal spat is unfolding that could prove far more consequential for the future of trade talks, and potentially the broader US-China relationship.

My colleague Willis Sparks wrote on Friday about the arrest of Meng Wanzhou, a top executive at the Chinese telecom giant Huawei , who was detained in Canada and is fighting extradition to the US over charges related to alleged violations of Iran sanctions. On Monday, a Canadian diplomat and aid worker, Michael Kovrig, was taken into custody in Beijing. The US is reportedly considering issuing a travel advisory for all Americans planning to visit China.

With so much at stake, here's a quick rundown on the latest twist in the US-China trade war:

The short-term problem: Washington and Beijing appear intent on not letting Meng's arrest upend their fragile trade truce. But the Huawei affair will probably make it harder to reach a meaningful breakthrough ahead of a March 1 deadline – after which US tariffs will rise on billions of dollars of Chinese goods. The arrest of Kovrig may be intended as a shot across the bow intended to influence the course of Meng's case.

While Meng was released on bail on yesterday, there's still a lot that could go wrong between now and March 1. Any appearance that she is being humiliated – by being put on a plane to the US in shackles, say – will inflame nationalist fervor around the incident in China and hinder Xi's ability to negotiate with the US on trade. President Trump, for his part, has hinted that the US might intervene in Meng's case if it was "good for what will be certainly the largest trade deal ever made." But he may have limited influence over how the case unfolds, given that it's primarily a law enforcement matter.

The longer-term problem: Even if Meng is eventually freed, Huawei itself could still face serious legal jeopardy in the US. Recall that Huawei's smaller rival ZTE was nearly pushed into bankruptcy earlier this year when the Commerce Department banned it from acquiring US technology for seven years in a similar sanctions case, before Trump granted it a last-minute reprieve.

China hawks in the Trump administration and Congress will almost certainly now push for similar treatment of Huawei. If they succeed, it would be politically explosive: Huawei is one of the world's leading suppliers of next-generation 5G networking technology, and it's much more critical to China's long-term tech and industrial ambitions than ZTE. China would likely see any move to restrict the export of US parts to Huawei as tantamount to a declaration of economic war.

The bottom line: Forget the car tariffs and other cosmetic trade fixes – if you want to know where the US-China relationship is going, keep an eye on what happens with Meng and Huawei.

Khant Thaw Htoo is a young engineer who works in Eni's Sakura Tower office in the heart of Yangon. As an HSE engineer, he monitors the safety and environmental impact of onshore and offshore operations. He also looks out for his parents' well-being, in keeping with Myanmar's traditions.

Learn more about Khant in the final episode of the Faces of Eni series, which focuses on Eni's employees around the world.

On his first day as president, Joe Biden signed a remarkable series of executive orders. Boom! The US rejoins the Paris Climate Accord. Bang! The United States rejoins the World Health Organization. Pow! No more ban on immigration from many Muslim-majority countries. Biden's press secretary reminded reporters later in the day that all these orders merely begin complex processes that take time, but the impact is still dramatic.

If you lead a country allied with the US, or you're simply hoping for some specific commitment or clear and credible statement of purpose from the US government, you might feel a little dizzy today. The sight of an American president (Barack Obama) signing his name, of the next president (Donald Trump) erasing that name from the same legislation/bill, and then the following president (Biden) signing it back into law again will raise deep concerns over the long-term reliability of the world's still-most-powerful nation.

More Show less

Kevin Sneader, Global Managing Partner at McKinsey & Company, provides perspective on what corporate business leaders are thinking during the global coronavirus crisis:

Should businesses be pessimistic or optimistic about 2021?

It's easy to be gloomy about the year ahead when faced with the realities of a cold, bleak winter in much of the world. Add to that lockdowns across Europe, surging case numbers and hospitalizations, and dreadful events in the Capitol in the US to name a few reasons for pessimism. But I think there is a case for optimism when it comes to this year. After all, it's true to say that it's always darkest before the dawn, and my conversations with business leaders suggest there are reasons to be positive by 2021.

More Show less

Renowned tech journalist Kara Swisher has no qualms about saying that many of the country's social media companies need to be held accountable for their negative role in our current national discourse. Swisher calls for "a less friendly relationship with tech" by the Biden administration, an "internet bill of rights" around privacy, and an investigation into antitrust issues.

Swisher, who hosts the New York Times podcast Sway, joins Ian Bremmer for the latest episode of GZERO World, airing on public television nationwide beginning this Friday, January 22th. Check local listings.

Brexit pettiness lingers: Here we were naively thinking the Brexit shenanigans were over after the EU and UK agreed to an eleventh-hour post-Brexit trade deal last month. We were wrong — the saga continues. Now, a new row has erupted after the Johnson government said it will not give the EU ambassador in London the same diplomatic status awarded to other representatives of nation states. Unsurprisingly, this announcement peeved Brussels, whose delegates enjoy full diplomatic status in at least 142 other countries. The UK says it will give the EU envoy the same privileges as those given to international organizations, which are subject to change and do not include immunity from detention and taxation given to diplomats under the Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations. EU members are furious, with officials accusing London of simply trying to flex its muscles and engaging in "petty" behavior. The two sides will discuss the matter further when UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson meets EU representatives next week, their first face-to-face since the two sides settled the Brexit quagmire on December 31. Alas, the Brexit nightmare continues.

More Show less
The GZERO World Podcast with Ian Bremmer. Listen now.

GZEROMEDIA

Subscribe to GZERO Media's Newsletter: Signal