National Security Strategy: Will The @RealDonaldTrump Please Stand Up?

President Trump’s National Security Strategy, released Monday, describes a world of great power conflict rather than cooperation, in which Russia and China are the United States’ “strategic competitors.” It stresses economic nationalism and strong borders, casts traditional alliances in a more transactional light, and reaffirms the US commitment to spreading democratic values.


No question the world is becoming more adversarial — have you been on Twitter lately you libtard/trumpkin/socialist/fascist/troll? — but the NSS raises a few key questions.

First — does Trump really believe this stuff? The strong China language squares with Trump’s scorching anti-Beijing campaign rhetoric, though he has taken a much softer tone with China since meeting Xi last April. But Trump’s open admiration for Putin undercuts the assertive tone about Russia, and his embrace of authoritarian leaders like Sisi, Erdogan, Mohamed bin Salman, and Duterte belies the democratic values spiel. Why does this matter? The NSS is meant to clarify the administration’s thinking on key issues. But if the #NSS differs markedly from @RealDonaldTrump, its utility fades fast, for friends and foes.

Second, “competing” with China really means two things: making the bilateral relationship fairer, and outmaneuvering China for influence over other countries. On the bilateral front, there’s a case for hitting China harder over unfair trade, industrial, and intellectual property practices, though risking a full-on trade war could actually hurt American consumers and companies.

But if Trump means to push back against growing Chinese influence elsewhere in the world, it’s hard to see how an America that is shunning multilateralism and spending less money abroad can compete with a newly assertive China that is creating its own new multilateral structures and throwing tons of cash around the world these days.

“America is in the game” Trump said on Monday, “and America is going to win.”

Well, game on.

In Italy, stacks of plastic boxes in supermarkets and stores are not garbage - they are collected and reused, thanks to a consortium that specializes in recycling them for food storage. How do these "circular" plastic boxes help reduce energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions?

Learn more in this episode of Eni's Energy SUPERFACTS series.

British economist Jim O'Neill says the global economy can bounce back right to where it was before, in a V-shaped recovery. But his argument is based on a lot of "ifs," plus comparisons to the 2008 recession and conditions in China and South Korea that may not truly apply. Ian Bremmer and Eurasia Group's Robert Kahn take issue with O'Neill's op-ed, on this edition of The Red Pen.

Today, we're taking our Red Pen to an article titled "A V-Shaped Recovery Could Still Happen." I'm not buying it. It's published recently by Project Syndicate, authored by British economist named Jim O'Neill. Jim O'Neill is very well known. He was chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management. He's the guy that coined the acronym BRICS, Brazil, Russia, India, China. So, no slouch. But as you know, we don't agree with everything out there. And this is the case. Brought to you by the letter V. We're taking sharp issue with the idea that recovery from all the economic devastation created by the coronavirus pandemic is going to happen quickly. That after the sharp drop that the world has experienced, everything bounces back to where it was before. That's the V. Economists around the world are debating how quickly recovery will happen to be sure. But we're not buying the V. Here's why. W-H-Y.

More Show less

Over the past few years, we've seen three major emerging powers take bold action to right what they say are historical wrongs.

First came Crimea. When the Kremlin decided in 2014 that Western powers were working against Russian interests in Ukraine, President Vladimir Putin ordered Russian troops to seize the Crimean Peninsula, which was then part of Ukraine. Moscow claimed that Crimea and its ethnic Russian majority had been part of the Russian Empire for centuries until a shameful deal in 1954 made Crimea part of the Ukrainian Soviet Republic. Americans and Europeans imposed sanctions on Russia. But Ukraine is not part of NATO or the EU, and no further action was taken.

More Show less

Nicholas Thompson, editor-in-chief of WIRED, provides his perspective on technology news:

Will the new audit of Facebook civil rights practices change the way the company operates?

Yes. It came under a lot of pressure from civil rights activists who organized an advertising boycott. And then an internal audit on Facebook's effect on civil rights came out. It was quite critical. Those two things, one after the other, will surely lead to changes at the company.

More Show less

The United States and the European Union have comparable population sizes, but their COVID-19 death toll trajectories have recently become very different. Since the beginning of July, the average number of both new fatalities and new deaths per 1 million people is rapidly increasing in the US while it remains mostly flat in the EU. We compare this to the average number of new cases each seven days in both regions, where the US trend continues upward but is not surging like the death toll. EU countries' robust public health systems and citizens' willingness to wear masks and maintain social distance could explain the disparity.