We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for Eurasia Group and its affiliates, including GZERO Media, to clarify the types of data we collect, how we collect it, how we use data and with whom we share data. By using our website you consent to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, including the transfer of your personal data to the United States from your country of residence, and our use of cookies described in our Cookie Policy.
![Olympic Torch](https://www.gzeromedia.com/media-library/image.jpg?id=18661734&width=1200&height=681)
After the Cold War ended, the Olympics became something of a snooze, geopolitically speaking — but that’s certainly changed since 2008.
The Beijing Olympics that year were billed as a lavish coming-out party for China as a 21st century global power. The 2014 Sochi Olympics were President Vladimir Putin’s bid to show a Russia resurgent — though the Ukraine crisis, graft, and revelations of state-sponsored doping wrecked the party. Then, in Brazil, the cost of the 2016 Rio Games helped mobilize anti-government protests that deepened the country’s ongoing political crisis. And now we have 2018 in Pyeongchang, where the prospects of thermonuclear war have something to do with whether two North Korean ice skaters cross the DMZ in five weeks’ time.
Without drawing this too far, we have to ask: in a world where a growing number of nations are competing for global power, is it any wonder that politics are heating up at the Olympic games?