GZERO Media logo

The Endgame In Venezuela

The Endgame In Venezuela

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro faces his toughest test since coming to office in 2013, as a mounting wave of street protests fueled by a newly-energized opposition have plunged the country into political crisis. Maduro was able to weather similar challenges to his power in 2015 and 2017, but there's reason to think he might not be so lucky this time around.


First, a charismatic figure, Juan Guaido, has emerged as a singular voice to lead the previously fragmented domestic opposition to Maduro's regime.

Second, the opposition has vocal external support. The US, along with regional powers like Brazil and Colombia (Mexico is the notable exception), strongly backs Guaido, and most of Europe is now looking to follow the US lead. Yesterday, the US placed sanctions on Venezuelan state-owned oil giant PDVSA, further squeezing the regime's main economic lifeline.

Third, Venezuelans desperately want to end an economic and humanitarian catastrophe that has seen the economy shrink by half since 2015, driven 90 percent of the population into poverty, and is expected to cause another 2 million people to flee the country this year.

But unlocking change in Venezuela will take more than simply sustaining popular protest. The key for Maduro is whether the country's deeply entrenched military remains on his side. Here are three ways the endgame could play out:

The bait-and-switch: Maduro could step down, flee the country, and allow someone else from the military to take over. A senior diplomat tells us that Russia, which has reportedly sent military contractors to protect Maduro, would like to see him flee to Cuba, making way for a suitably anti-American figure to take his place.

A brokered solution: Guaido and the military could strike a deal to oust Maduro and share power, guaranteeing his inner circle protection from prosecution. Guiado has already offered amnesty to soldiers that decide to abandon Maduro.

An opposition-led government: The government could also hold genuine elections – and respect the results. While the US and Europe might prefer this outcome, it remains the least likely. Barring heavy US military support, any new government will require the support of members of the existing regime. That will preclude the opposition from wielding complete control.

The bottom line: The opposition will hold major rallies tomorrow and Saturday. More important than the support of outside actors, the real test for Maduro and Venezuela will be how the military decides to respond.

Khant Thaw Htoo is a young engineer who works in Eni's Sakura Tower office in the heart of Yangon. As an HSE engineer, he monitors the safety and environmental impact of onshore and offshore operations. He also looks out for his parents' well-being, in keeping with Myanmar's traditions.

Learn more about Khant in the final episode of the Faces of Eni series, which focuses on Eni's employees around the world.

On his first day as president, Joe Biden signed a remarkable series of executive orders. Boom! The US rejoins the Paris Climate Accord. Bang! The United States rejoins the World Health Organization. Pow! No more ban on immigration from many Muslim-majority countries. Biden's press secretary reminded reporters later in the day that all these orders merely begin complex processes that take time, but the impact is still dramatic.

If you lead a country allied with the US, or you're simply hoping for some specific commitment or clear and credible statement of purpose from the US government, you might feel a little dizzy today. The sight of an American president (Barack Obama) signing his name, of the next president (Donald Trump) erasing that name from the same legislation/bill, and then the following president (Biden) signing it back into law again will raise deep concerns over the long-term reliability of the world's still-most-powerful nation.

More Show less

10: Violent protests against new coronavirus restrictions have erupted in at least 10 regions in the Netherlands, which recently imposed the country's first nationwide curfew since World War Two. Protesters clashed with police and looted stores — and police say that a far-right anti-immigrant group has taken advantage of the discontent to exacerbate tensions.

More Show less

One result of the law enforcement crackdown on pro-Trump Capitol rioters following the events of January 6 is that many right-wing extremists have left public social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter for encrypted apps like Telegram and Signal. But renowned tech journalist Kara Swisher isn't all that concerned. "The white supremacist stuff, it's like mold. They thrived in the light, actually." Now that these groups no longer have such public platforms, their recruiting power, Swisher argues, will be greatly diminished. Plus, she points out, they were already on those encrypted apps to begin with. Swisher's conversation with Ian Bremmer was part of the latest episode of GZERO World.

Renowned tech journalist Kara Swisher has no doubt that social media companies bear responsibility for the January 6th pro-Trump riots at the Capitol and will likely be complicit in the civil unrest that may continue well into Biden's presidency. It's no surprise, she argues, that the online rage that platforms like Facebook and Twitter intentionally foment translated into real-life violence. But if Silicon Valley's current role in our national discourse is untenable, how can the US government rein it in? That, it turns out, is a bit more complicated. Swisher joins Ian Bremmer on GZERO World.

The GZERO World Podcast with Ian Bremmer. Listen now.

GZEROMEDIA

Subscribe to GZERO Media's Newsletter: Signal

Are online extremists moving underground?

GZERO World Clips