February 20, 2026
The Supreme Court has struck down President Trump’s use of the national emergency clause to impose sweeping tariffs around the world.
Ian Bremmer explains why this ruling was predictable and why it’s a major setback for Trump’s trade strategy.
For months, the administration argued that tariffs on countries ranging from China to Canada to Brazil were justified under emergency powers. The Court disagreed, ruling that Congress, not the president, holds that authority.
The immediate effect: the effective US tariff rate drops sharply. American consumers pay less. US government revenue from tariffs declines. And Trump’s leverage heading into key negotiations, including with Beijing, weakens.
But this doesn’t mean tariffs disappear. The White House has other legal tools it can use. What this ruling does show is something bigger:
“The court is an effective independent check on the executive. Republicans in Congress are not. Impeachment is not. But the court system is.”
Ian breaks down what this means for markets, consumers, global trade, and the balance of power inside the US government.
More For You
Ian Bremmer sits down with Ivan Krastev, Chairman of the Centre for Liberal Strategies and political scientist, to discuss Hungary's consequential upcoming election and what it means for the far right globally.
Most Popular
A new US regulatory framework sets clear rules for stablecoins, defining issuer responsibilities and laying the groundwork for consistent federal and state oversight. With guardrails in place, stablecoins are shifting from crypto experiment to payment infrastructure. Explore the stablecoin framework with Bank of America Institute.
See: “Raphael: Sublime Poetry at the Met.” The first Raphael retrospective ever mounted in the US is running through June 28 at the Met Museum.
Forty-eight countries have officially qualified for the World Cup, after Iraq booked the final spot with its win against Bolivia on Tuesday.
© 2025 GZERO Media. All Rights Reserved | A Eurasia Group media company.
