MBS CONFRONTS Trump!
October 31, 2026
Who among us has not gotten stiffed by a superpower.
Watch more PUPPET REGIME!

Who among us has not gotten stiffed by a superpower.
Watch more PUPPET REGIME!
How worried should Europe be that Russia’s war in Ukraine could spill beyond its borders? For nearly five years, the war has largely stayed where it started: inside Ukraine. But Russia is increasingly taking the fight beyond the battlefield. Moscow has stepped up a campaign of hybrid warfare across Europe—arson, cyberattacks, disinformation, even assassinations. Where is the line between a war in Ukraine and a wider war in Europe? And what happens if that line is crossed?
Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski joins Ian Bremmer to assess the state of the war, Europe’s resolve, and how NATO should respond to escalating attacks across the continent. With US financial support for Kyiv halted, Europe is shouldering the cost of Ukraine’s defense, and arguing it deserves a greater say in how the war ends. Can Europe defend itself and support Ukraine without help from the United States?
Russia's war in Ukraine is increasingly spilling beyond its borders. From suspected sabotage and cyberattacks to drones and aircraft testing NATO airspace, Moscow is probing how far it can go without triggering a wider confrontation. Meanwhile, uncertainty over US support is forcing Europe to rethink its own defenses. But with 27 EU countries divided by competing priorities and far-right, nationalist politics gaining ground across the continent, can Europe agree on how to respond? Ian Bremmer explains why Vladimir Putin's biggest test for Europe may be whether the continent can act together before a crisis forces its hand.
While the average American household has spent $1,100 more on gas and diesel since the start of the Iran war, oil companies have been profiting from higher fuel prices. The same 50 US oil and gas companies made less than $47 billion in profits over the same period in 2025. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump boasted that the US was making a “freaking fortune” from oil at a rally last week. Polls show most Americans feel the opposite.
Christine Lagarde announced yesterday that she will step down as head of the European Central Bank (ECB) eight months earlier than planned. Lagarde’s early exit will allow French President Emmanuel Macron to play a role in choosing her successor before he leaves office next year. The move will prevent presidential frontrunner Marine Le Pen from having a say in the decision – the second such appointment a Macron successor has lost out on. European leaders are also rushing to finalize a seven-year budget by December, ahead of a potential Le Pen victory. Le Pen, for her part, pledged to dramatically cut France’s contributions to the EU budget, and has pushed for the ECB to intervene to bring down France’s debt costs – moves that will be harder once the EU budget is approved and the ECB chair is replaced.
This weekend the US flips its clocks back by an hour in the annual ritual of ending “Daylight Saving Time.” The modern practice of extending summer days by moving clocks ahead by an hour dates back to World War I, when Germany and Austria-Hungary did so to save energy. The US quickly followed. But these days, most Americans find it annoying. So a bipartisan group of US lawmakers, backed by President Donald Trump, wants to scrap the twice-yearly time change and make DST permanent. The tradeoff would be longer winter mornings, and school safety advocates, the ski industry, and even sleep medicine experts strongly oppose it. Trump, frustrated, recently doxxed a prominent Republican opponent of the measure, but there’s little chance a bill to make DST permanent will get debated before next year. Only a third of countries in the world have DST, and most are in Europe or North America. What do you think about DST? Let us know here — include your name/location, and we may publish your response.
Three blockchain analytics companies have said North Korea is likely behind a $6 billion crypto hack of Binance, the world’s most popular cryptocurrency exchange platform, marking the largest cyber heist in history. Binance says it has blocked some of the stolen funds from being transferred and has begun recovering some of the money, though it remains unclear how much. The company has blamed TraderTraitor, an elite North Korean state-sponsored hacking group. Cyberhacking has become the country’s most lucrative source of revenue in recent years, replacing coal and textile exports that have been hampered by global sanctions. Its first major attack came in 2014, when hackers targeted Sony Pictures ahead of the release of “The Interview,” a comedy mocking North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Since then, North Korea has significantly expanded its capabilities. Last year, North Korean hackers reportedly stole $2 billion in cryptocurrency, accounting for roughly 60% of total global theft.
Poppy production surged dramatically in Afghanistan despite the Taliban banning its cultivation in 2022. Why are Afghan farmers taking the risk of growing it illegally?
Take the quiz to see if you guessed correctly!
Dinner at 8:30, you know where.
Last week, the US’s fertility rate hit a record low: CDC data for 2025 showed that for every 1000 women aged 15 to 44, only 53 gave birth each year, down from 54 the previous year. The decline continues a decades-long decline.
But the US is not alone. In much of the world, fertility rates are in freefall. Almost every developed country today has an aging population, putting a huge strain on social spending and pension systems, and fewer people paying the taxes to support them.
Many governments have pursued creative ways to encourage people to have more children, some as extreme as offering cash bonuses of $55,000 per child, with mixed results. But what about focusing on the other end of life? Some governments are reframing what it means to grow old, trying ways to keep people employed longer and contributing to rather than drawing welfare resources.
Incentivizing later retirement. Life expectancy has been climbing around the world for well over a century. As people live longer, they’re also staying healthier longer, according to the World Health Organization. Some countries with aging populations are trying to capitalize on their so-called “silver economies” and keep people in the workforce longer.
In 2004, Japan, the first country to become ‘super-aged,’ meaning more than 20% of its population is over 65, began incentivizing workers to stay in the workforce until at least 65. Then in 2022, it introduced a policy that permanently reduced benefits for those who took their state pension early. As of September, it’s home to over 100,000 centenarians.
Singapore, which became super-aged in September, offers careers and employment support to those over 50 and, since 2020, has run a program that gives some employers grants of $2,500 Singapore dollars ($1,951 USD) for every employee they hire or retain over 60.
But these efforts aren’t sustainable long term, explained Jeremy Chan, a senior analyst for China and Northeast Asia at Eurasia Group – demand on the welfare state will eventually outpace these measures. “Where it becomes an overwhelming disadvantage is [when] the costs for the government of servicing this aging population begin to overwhelm the revenue that’s coming in,” Chan said. For example, more than a third of Japan’s 2025 budget went to social spending, reflecting the high cost of an aging population.
Raising the retirement age. France, Germany, the UK, and China have all introduced plans in recent years to raise the retirement age. Germany is targeting a retirement age of 70 by the 2090s, up from 67 now. Meanwhile, Denmark, Estonia, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Portugal have tied or are tying their retirement age to national life expectancy – measures that can be effective in the short term.
“To a certain degree, if you’re extending the working life of the person who would have retired at 55 but is now working till 60, then that kind of solves the problem in the short term,” said Chan.
That’s not always popular: when France proposed raising the retirement age from 62 to 64 in 2023, hundreds of thousands took to the streets to protest. Germany and Denmark also saw protests over increases to the retirement age.
The AI problem. But even as countries grapple with aging populations, many advanced economies will face another workforce disruption: AI. Research shows that AI is dramatically changing the labor market and dampening entry-level hiring. People aged 22 to 25 in easily automated careers are now employed 19% less than their less AI-exposed counterparts.
“You’re going to have a whole generation of people that are going to have to reskill, rebrand, find some sort of productive ends to their time – to [be] contributing members of society while living in this AI future where there are fewer jobs,” Chan said. Down the road, this could mean fewer people contributing tax revenue, and more people needing social welfare.
What’s next? Not every country is seeing a fertility decline. Many countries in South Asia and Africa still have growing populations, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. By 2030, the World Economic Forum estimates that 40% of the world’s young people will be African. Many of these regions also struggle with underemployment: Niger, for example, will need to create 650,000 new jobs each year for the next 30 years to meet demand from its growing population – a target it is unlikely to hit.
That leaves an enormous opportunity: a region with a booming young population eager for work. The question is whether governments can turn that demographic divide into an opportunity before the costs of aging become too hard to bear.
As Afghan farmers struggle with high operating costs and low crop prices, more are taking a risk by illegally growing poppy to feed their families. Poppy is a key ingredient in opium – which can then be used to make heroin – and Afghanistan has long been a major producer. Before the Taliban banned cultivation in 2022, the country supplied more than 80% of the world’s opium. Now, farmers hide poppies among tall cereal crops, harvest them secretly, and sell them on the black market. The surge could have consequences far beyond Afghanistan: a growing supply could drive down drug prices across Asia and Europe.
Alaska has launched a criminal probe into Democratic Senate candidate Mary Peltola’s campaign after The Times revealed a plan to recruit people with the same name as her Republican opponent, incumbent Dan Sullivan, to run for office and confuse voters. The ballot for next Tuesday’s midterms already features Peltola, Sullivan, and another unrelated Dan Sullivan. The Sullivan Search was revealed just days after President Donald Trump questioned the legitimacy of the two-Sullivan ballot. Whether or not the probe finds a crime, the Peltola campaign’s approach undermines the spirit of a fair vote. That will fuel broader campaigns, led mostly by Trump allies, to question the midterms’ legitimacy. Polls show Democrats likely to retake the House, with a shot at retaking the Senate. Fifty-five percent of Americans polled think the vote will be legitimate, down more than 10 points since 2022.
Forty-eight African delegations, including twenty heads of state, are in Moscow this week for a summit with Russia. Russia hopes to expand its influence on a continent it has spent years competing for against China, the US, and Europe, even claiming it can be a “better partner than the colonial West.” But what can Russia offer that others cannot? For one, security. Many African governments struggle to contain insurgencies, and Russia lends military support through its state-funded paramilitary force, Africa Corps (formerly the Wagner Group). This is especially important in the Sahel, where the Africa Corps have helped military governments battle Islamic insurgents. Then there’s energy. As countries face rising fuel prices due to the Iran war, Russia is pitching its nuclear-technology expertise. At the summit, Moscow unveiled plans to develop floating nuclear power plants for coastal African countries, potentially offering a new source of electricity while deepening their dependence on Russian technology.
Albania has announced fines to crack down on anti-government protests that have spread across the country in recent months. Demonstrators can now be fined more than $6,000 for participating in protests that turn violent, even if they don’t personally contribute to the violence itself. That’s no small cost in Albania: the average pre-tax monthly salary is just over $1,000. Demonstrations began in June against plans to build a luxury resort on a nature reserve, backed by US President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, but have since ballooned into protests over perceived government corruption, a struggling healthcare system, and a lack of opportunity for young people. Protesters have also called for the resignation of four-term Prime Minister Edi Rama. The crackdown comes as cash-strapped governments across Europe try to respond to a wave of youth-led protests. Rama said the new fines were inspired by a French bill that made protesters liable for damage they caused.
For Gen Z, changing jobs can mean a bigger paycheck. Younger workers continue to see the largest gains from switching, offering a glimpse into how career mobility is evolving across generations.
On Sunday, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado returned home after ten months in exile.
In the time since she last set foot on Venezuelan soil, the United States arrested authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro on narco-terrorism charges and installed Vice President Delcy Rodríguez as acting president. As the Trump administration slowly negotiated with Rodríguez to hold elections, it made a flurry of oil deals, including one that gives the US the rights to more than 65 billion barrels and involves a Venezuelan businessman under investigation for money laundering. The country was also struck by two devastating earthquakes that killed thousands. Machado, meanwhile, gifted her Nobel Peace Prize to President Trump, in an effort to facilitate her return and Venezuela's transition to elections, in which she would expect to be heavily favored to win.
Much has changed since Machado left. But now that she's back, the big question is: what is the timeline for Venezuela to hold its first free-and-fair elections in over a decade? And does the Trump administration care? The answers (possibly 2027 but more likely 2028; and it does, while not making it a priority) reveal as much about the future of Venezuela as they do about the Donroe Doctrine in Latin America.
Shortly after removing Maduro from power, the US embarked on a strategy of simultaneously rebuilding Venezuelan oil infrastructure and reforming its political institutions. Or as Trump said at the time: "We're going to run it, fix it. We'll have elections at the right time," but also: "We're going to take our oil back." On both fronts, the Trump administration has had considerable success: coercing Rodríguez into reforms to Venezuela's Supreme Court and opening the oil industry to foreign investment (headlined by a $7 billion investment from Chevron), which has already enabled a 17.6% spike in production after years of decline.
At the UN General Assembly, Trump made these commercial motivations clear in announcing "to the victor belong the spoils." After removing Maduro in violation of international law and announcing a desire to profit from the endeavor before heads of state from around the world, the US made clear that its priority was business first, rule of law and democracy second.
That put Machado in an awkward position after the US intervention as she lobbied the Trump administration to help her return to Venezuela – without much success. After she reached the country on Sunday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio voiced public support for Machado's return, but the administration had long privately discouraged it. And while the US State Department has laid out a plan for the return of democracy, the benchmarks that must be met before elections can be held are steep – including the formation of a new Supreme Court and National Electoral Council, the restructuring of Venezuela's enormous national debt, and the declaration of a vacancy in the presidency, followed by elections six months later. Achieving those goals won't be fast, meaning an election is more likely to arrive in 2028 than 2027.
It's in Rubio's interest to ensure a democratic transition – as a key accomplishment that could burnish his credentials for a 2028 presidential run or preserve his political future in Florida, home to many Venezuelan expats. But he's one actor in an administration more focused on business opportunities and other foreign policy challenges, as the US readies for more potential strikes on Iran after the midterms.
Machado is in a tight spot. If she galvanizes public demonstrations in favor of elections, she risks drawing the ire of both Rodríguez and Trump, which could set back the cause and her political career. She also needs to maintain credibility with the Venezuelan people, which means criticizing the potentially exploitative oil deals – but making sure she directs those attacks towards the incumbent Venezuelan government, not the Trump administration (whose support she needs).
She will likely start campaigning across Venezuela but without any certainty of an election, while facing threats to her safety. The latter is nothing new for the Nobel winner, who lived in hiding for extended periods during Maduro's tenure, but the long run-up to elections is concerning in an unstable country with a history of political violence. The State Department's strategy of cautiously rebuilding Venezuela's institutions first is legitimate – it takes infrastructure and planning to have free-and-fair elections to replace a government that has systematically rigged them – but the slow pace of democratization carries its own risks.
To the Trump administration's critics, it's hard to take the gradual strategy in good faith amid the backdrop of Trump's accusation that Brazil's election on Sunday (in which incumbent President Lula da Silva came back to defeat the more Trump-friendly Flávio Bolsonaro) was "rigged" – it wasn't – and empowerment of businessman Alejandro Betancourt, who is currently under criminal investigation, in Venezuela's oil sector. To the administration's supporters, Machado's return is a positive milestone, as the State Department reforms the Venezuelan system to allow her to run for the presidency – while it directs more of its focus on America-first policy priorities: combating drug trafficking (made easier with Rodríguez than Maduro) and leveraging commercial opportunities.
At its core, that is the Donroe Doctrine: a United States that acts unilaterally in its own interest in its hemisphere, without second-guessing international law or norms around sovereignty. There is an interest in promoting democracy, but US-friendly leaders are the more pressing goal. (And, as Brazil showed Trump, those don't always come from elections.) The Donroe Doctrine has likewise led to the American pressure campaign against Cuba, which has involved a thus far unsuccessful search for an equivalent to Delcy Rodríguez in order to manage an aspirational democratic transition: a unilateral move to install a more palatable head of state who can eventually preside over the establishment of a new political order.
The path forward for Machado and Venezuelan democracy is uncertain. There are going to be elections eventually. The prospects for Venezuela returning to a functional representative government are the best they have been in decades. But the transition to democracy is being slow-played by an administration that has deprioritized it, has only two years left in its term, and is experiencing a collapse of political support in the US. Building a sustainable democratic model is difficult in the best circumstances – building it in this environment... well, let's see.
Machado's return is a step forward. Now, Venezuela's democratic institutions must return from their exile.
In this ‘ask ian,’ Ian Bremmer says recent elections around the world point to a common trend: voters are increasingly unhappy with their governments as inflation, security concerns and economic pressures shape political outcomes.
Ian cautions against seeing recent results as a broad victory for either the left or the right. Instead, “a lot of people continue to be really angry with their existing governments,” with high turnout reflecting growing interest in politics. In Brazil, Ian says affordability and concerns over social benefits helped drive Lula’s victory, while in Serbia, young voters rallied against a government they saw as unaccountable.
Ian argues that this sentiment is spreading across countries, including Europe and Israel, and could be reflected in upcoming US midterm elections.

