We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for Eurasia Group and its affiliates, including GZERO Media, to clarify the types of data we collect, how we collect it, how we use data and with whom we share data. By using our website you consent to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, including the transfer of your personal data to the United States from your country of residence, and our use of cookies described in our Cookie Policy.
The first Patriot surface-to-air missile systems delivered to Romanian Army can be seen at the National Training Center for Air Defense, in Capu Midia, eastern Romania, September 17 , 2020.
The head of Europe’s largest munitions maker made headlines on Wednesday by suggesting that Europe needs a new short-range air defense shield similar to the Iron Dome system that Israel has used since 2011. The suggestion reflects two important trends.
First, European leaders fear that Vladimir Putin will only become more aggressive in his bid to test NATO’s resilience and expand Russia’s territory – and they see little reason for optimism that Putin’s successor will behave differently. At the same time, they fear a Donald Trump victory in November would inflict irrevocable damage on trust in NATO and that, even if he loses, a new American isolationism will spread.
Second, calls for a missile shield are triggering another debate in European security circles that reveals again just how divided EU leaders remain over long-term security plans. The union has agreed to establish “capabilities related to integrated European air and missile defense” by 2035. But fights over how to pay for it, which systems to invest in, and how it might be deployed continue to complicate Europe’s debate over collective defense.