As US COVID-19 deaths grow, blaming China helps Trump politically
May 04, 2020
VIDEOSGZERO World with Ian BremmerQuick TakePUPPET REGIMEIan ExplainsGZERO ReportsAsk IanGlobal Stage
Site Navigation
Search
Human content,
AI powered search.
Latest Stories
Sign up for GZERO Daily.
Get our latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Global Stage AI for Good Summit
WATCH RECORDING
Asia
Presented by
So much news over the weekend, particularly on the US-China story. Let's talk about why. Numbers that we're talking about in the United States are changing. I think everybody heard when Dr. Fauci came out and said, we probably can do under 100,000 total deaths if we all socially distance.
Then you heard the 60,000 number and okay, 60,000. Let's do 60,000.
President Trump wants to be the most optimistic possible cheerleader of any topic at any time, whether it's how far the Dow can go up, how great the economy can be, we can have 4% growth this year, all of it. How quickly you can get the deficit down despite expanding it. And now how few deaths we could have - he oriented towards that 60,000 figure. Even though at the time, five significant and respected modelers of coronavirus cases and deaths in the United States, 60,000 was always the most optimistic. But that's where they anchored. Now we're at about 70,000, with a couple thousand more a day. And even though New York City, and the New York metropolitan area, after all of this lockdown, Connecticut, New Jersey, you're getting a significant reduction in case transmissions. We can feel better, at least with this first wave, that we have it, I wouldn't say under control, but it's a much more optimistic trajectory. And you feel like you could start to, in a controlled way, open bits of the economy to a greater degree.
But so many of the states that are now opening, and keep in mind, President Trump and the CDC have supported phase one, phase two, phase three in how you would go about opening. They're not making the orders, the governors are the ones responsible, but they created the baseline to go against. Many of the states that are now opening across the country have not actually hit those metrics. If you've got conditions that are set out by the Trump administration and you're not actually adhering to them, then expect much more significant numbers of cases. And that's keeping in mind that if you look at the New York metro area, we're seeing a reduction in cases and deaths numbers every day. But if you look at the rest of the country, the numbers are going up. Not as fast as they were in New York and not as many as you've had in New York, but still going up. And not just cases because they are testing more, but hospitalizations and deaths too.
Some of those states are rural and the case numbers are small. So, if it gets bad, you still have time to change your path and maybe it won't. But in many states, that's not the case at all. I think our expectation now is without changing the expectation for US GDP all that much, you're probably going to be closer to 100,000 or more over the coming month, two months. And that's going to be much harder for Trump to sell. He will do his best. He will reorient it towards, well, if I hadn't done anything, we would have a million or 2.2 million deaths. That's what they originally said and of course, I'm the guy that shut down the border with China and all of that. But, for those that have heard him in the last four-eight weeks, say not 100,000, hopefully 60,000, and now back to 100,000 or more, that's going to hurt.
Trump was at his highest level of approval, inching 46%-47%, blended rate. Hard to see that he's going to be doing that well going forward. You expect in the next few weeks, months, it's going to take a beating. Why am I saying all this, first of all, it's relevant in what's happened to US, but secondly, that's why you are seeing the Trump administration going much harder against China. If you're going to be blamed for much worse case load and death count in the United States, and if the very formulation that your administration put forward in terms of how you're supposed to reopen the economy is not actually being adhered to by your own governors, your own red state governors, it's making it hard for you to blame internally. You'll try. But it's much better to have an external bogey man that everyone can't stand. And China is that bogey man.
Especially because the Chinese are actually responsible. We know that the original virus came from Wuhan. And we know that they covered it up for a month. And while they were covering it up, people were traveling from Wuhan. Five million Chinese left the region, 400 plus thousand left China. And that's what got you the original cases, not in New York, turns out those came from Italy, though those cases from Europe had originally come from Wuhan. But from in Washington State, California, originally came from China. Also Iran. Also Europe. So, without that level of cover up, the chances you could avoid a pandemic and certainly avoid this kind of crisis, very and very much higher.
Now you're seeing people starting to say, we want to litigate against the Chinese, they should pay reparations for the economic damage being done. Of course, that's not going to happen. But they are going to take a fair amount of blame. And Trump sees that as an opportunity. Mike Pompeo, the secretary of state, over the weekend most dramatically said that they have conclusive evidence that this originally came not from a wet market, but from a bio lab. Not intentionally. Not that the Chinese were trying to cause bioterror with a new virus, but rather that their security was inadequate. They were experimenting on these viruses and they got out.
If it turns out that that's true and the Chinese lied about that, even though I view the cover up as by far the more significant issue, that is going to drive an enormous amount of bad will from the United States towards China. It makes a cold war with the Chinese much more likely. Of course, we haven't yet seen that evidence. And demanding that the Chinese provide us access to the lab to ensure there isn't any is very different than saying, we have a smoking gun. If it's the former, it's going to be partisan, just Trump supporters. If they have real evidence, the whole damn country is going to be baying for blood on this issue.
And at that point, you would expect the phase one trade deal to fall apart. You'll see higher tariffs. It will have a much bigger negative effect on the American markets this year. But will give the Trump administration a much juicier target for not taking accountability and blame for the for the pandemic.
Having said all of this, let us keep something very simple in mind, which is that China lied, they covered it up; but everyone else in the world, including the Chinese people, found out about it at the same time. Given that, there are a lot of countries around the world that have managed the COVID crisis much better than the United States, much better than Trump administration. There are a bunch of small countries like Iceland and New Zealand that are isolated. But there are also some big countries like South Korea and Germany. And the big issue I have is that, for all that we should appropriately blame the Chinese and want them to take accountability for not handling this, we also need to ask why the Trump administration was incapable of having a response befitting the world's greatest superpower. Why couldn't we look more like South Korea or Germany? I wouldn't expect us to look like Taiwan or New Zealand. These are tiny, tiny states. It's much easier to close your borders. They are much more homogeneous. It's much easier to get everyone to listen to what the government says. The US federal system, it's a lot harder. But you know what? Germany is a federal system, too, and they had a hell of a lot more willingness to go along with authority and they had a much more scientifically oriented approach. They weren't cheerleading from day one saying, everything will be awesome. And an everything will be awesome Presidency, without much focus on science, ultimately is likely to get us more than 100,000 deaths here in the United States.
Keep reading... Show less
More from Asia
Is Ukraine turning the tide against Russia?
Jul 19, 2026
Can Putin still outlast Ukraine?
Jul 17, 2026
Betting on Trump
July 17, 2026
Putin, Trump, and the power of YES
Jul 17, 2026
You vs. the News: A Weekly News Quiz - July 17, 2026
July 17, 2026
Mother-son podcasting duo take on quantum computing
July 16, 2026
Hunger strike in India intensifies
July 16, 2026
Can Netanyahu survive again?
July 16, 2026
Preserving presidential history for America’s 250th
July 16, 2026
The World Bank Group's Sangbu Kim on AI and job skills
July 15, 2026
Was the NATO summit in Ankara a success?
Jul 15, 2026
Ukraine has won Trump's favor. Can it keep it?
July 15, 2026
The US-Iran ceasefire is over. What’s next?
July 15, 2026
China’s economic engine cools
July 15, 2026
What’s Good Wednesday: July 15, 2026
July 15, 2026
Can AI protect humanitarian aid?
July 15, 2026
One gap, six different answers
July 15, 2026
Empowering associates with comprehensive benefits
July 15, 2026
An AI revolution for Africa?
July 14, 2026
To save lives, make data collection cool
July 14, 2026
Is the Strait of Hormuz closed again?
Jul 14, 2026
No more father-son time for the Bolsonaros
July 14, 2026
China is a global superpower. In football, not so much.
July 14, 2026
How AI is revolutionizing weather forecasting
July 13, 2026
Annalena Baerbock: AI can't replace the basics
July 13, 2026
How AI speeds up disaster relief efforts
July 13, 2026
The complicated legacy of Lindsey Graham
Jul 13, 2026
Europe has one last spree of Russian gas
July 13, 2026
The green World Cup
July 13, 2026
Is Iran's regime stronger than before the war?
July 13, 2026
What's next for the Iranian people?
July 12, 2026
The human cost of Iran's war, with Yeganeh Torbati
July 11, 2026
Can JD Vance reach the promised land?
July 10, 2026
Building a safer, more equitable AI future
July 10, 2026
Zohran over Bibi?
July 10, 2026
You vs. the News: A Weekly News Quiz - July 10, 2026
July 10, 2026
Ebola death toll tops 600
July 09, 2026
Philippines impeachment trial deepens a dynasty war
July 09, 2026
Europe’s most consequential vote since Brexit starts now
July 08, 2026
How Saudi Arabia is building its AI future
July 08, 2026
What’s Good Wednesday: July 8, 2026
July 08, 2026
Tour de Heat
July 08, 2026
How do Iranians feel about their future?
July 08, 2026
The power of sports
July 08, 2026
As development funding shrinks, can AI fill the gap?
July 07, 2026
Empowering associates with comprehensive benefits
July 07, 2026
NATO summit signals stability amid Trump uncertainty
July 07, 2026
The Gen Z gender divide
July 07, 2026
Out of Le Pen-alty box
July 07, 2026
Empowering local communities using AI
July 07, 2026
Trump's FIFA intervention is indefensible
July 06, 2026
The new smoke-free craze
July 06, 2026
Africa’s fountain of youth
July 06, 2026
America's 250th birthday
July 04, 2026
Over a million migrants seek legal status in Spain
July 02, 2026
The USA at 250: Trump revisits early American history
July 02, 2026
GZERO World with Ian Bremmer returns for Season 9
July 01, 2026
What’s Good Wednesday: Great American works
July 01, 2026
Ebola’s economic side effects
July 01, 2026
Bill Maher thinks Democrats need to take back patriotism
July 01, 2026
Preserving presidential history for America’s 250th
July 01, 2026
The EU steels itself for tariffs
June 30, 2026
America, 250 years under construction
June 30, 2026
Where press freedom falls, impunity rises
June 30, 2026
Empowering associates with comprehensive benefits
June 29, 2026
GZERO Series
GZERO World with Ian Bremmer
Puppet Regime
Quick Take
ask ian
Ian Explains
GZERO Reports
GZERO Europe
The Debrief
© 2026 GZERO Media. All Rights Reserved | A Eurasia Group company.
GZERO Daily: our free newsletter about global politics
Keep up with what’s going on around the world - and why it matters.