We have updated our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use for Eurasia Group and its affiliates, including GZERO Media, to clarify the types of data we collect, how we collect it, how we use data and with whom we share data. By using our website you consent to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy, including the transfer of your personal data to the United States from your country of residence, and our use of cookies described in our Cookie Policy.
{{ subpage.title }}
Montana court ruling sides with youth and climate
While climate change lawsuits are nothing new, most get thrown out of court. But one brought by young people aged 5 to 22 in Montana – the first-ever constitutional challenge of its kind in the US – made it to trial this summer. And on Monday, the judge seemed to set a major precedent by ruling that the plaintiffs have a constitutional right to a healthy environment. She also ruled that the state must consider climate change and environmental impacts when evaluating new projects.
The plaintiffs claimed the state had violated their right to “a clean and healthful environment in Montana for present and future generations,” a provision that’s been in the state constitution since 1972. Scientists testified about the detrimental effects of greenhouse gas emissions in Montana, blaming them for recent droughts, higher temperatures, longer wildfire seasons, and limited snowfall. The young plaintiffs also testified, speaking about the effects of climate change they had experienced.
The ruling could affect the state’s mining industry, which added $1.7 billion to the state's GDP in 2022, because it invalidates a law enacted by Republicans earlier this year prohibiting regulators from considering the climate change effects of new mining and oil and gas extraction projects.
But that will depend on whether the ruling sticks. The impact this case has depends on what happens next both within and outside Montana. The ruling came from a state court, not a federal one, which means it has no teeth beyond Montana’s borders and cannot be applied to national regulations, says Franck Gbaguidi, Eurasia Group’s director of Energy, Climate & Resources.
Moreover, there are potential avenues of appeal in various higher courts, Gbaguidi notes.
But if the ruling manages to stand, Our Children's Trust, an environmental organization that represented the Montana plaintiffs, will be poised to help others fight several cases – it has, in fact, already filed dozens of similar lawsuits in other states.
Why young people belong on the frontline of the climate fight
Across especially the developing world, young people have been disproportionately affected by the impacts of climate change.
Yet they still lack a place at the policymaking table.How can we fix this? Dr. Omnia El Omrani, Youth Envoy for COP27 and SDG Champion, offers some thoughts in a Global Stage livestream conversation hosted by GZERO in partnership with Microsoft.
"We need to create a space that is meaningful, that is consistent, that is sustainable, for our needs and our demand, and for us to really shape the future that does not kill our dreams, she says.
"Because we right now are running out of time."Young people, El Omrani adds, have the solutions, the persistence, and most importantly the hope to stop being victims and become agents of change in the global fight against climate change.
Watch the full Global Stage livestream conversation "The Road to 2030: Getting Global Goals Back on Track" .