Why we need a World Data Organization. Now.

Why we need a World Data Organization. Now.

Data is reshaping the 21st century world order. China knows this; for years, China has put the development of advanced communications technology and control of data at the center of its plan to maintain social order as it opens its economy and expands its international influence. Where Western powers like the US were content to largely let technology companies police themselves, the Chinese government has promoted and enlisted its tech champions in its plans for national development. Until recently, these different approaches to data, technology, and the internet—one driven by the US private sector, the other by China's public sector—coexisted in a global marketplace.


But one consequence of the trade war between the US and China is Beijing realizing how vulnerable it remains to the constraints of the current system and its ongoing reliance on the US in key technology sectors. China no longer assumes its technology companies will have access to cutting-edge Western hardware, software, and intellectual property. Instead, China has decided it needs to become more self-sufficient, and it's bringing enormous resources to bear to do so.

China's decision to go it alone on tech is the single most impactful geopolitical decision made in decades; it also represents the greatest danger to globalization in the post-War era.

The "splinternet"—the threat of a permanent rift in the flow of information and technology between China and the West—looms larger each day. China has a strategy here; the West doesn't. Nearly 20 years into this new century, the world's democracies have yet to agree on a comprehensive, multilateral approach to technology to govern the use and flow of data, or to address attempts to hijack the open flow of information by criminals, terrorists, and autocrats.

To develop an effective strategy, the West needs two things. First, a group of objective, unbiased observers who can see where the digital world's development is headed. This would be the data equivalent of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which helps the world understand its current vulnerabilities to global warming. To figure out where we're going, we must first understand where we are.

Second, the West needs to establish a multilateral institution composed of like-minded allies whose main responsibility is to set norms and standards to govern the use of data and tech to best ensure that both encourage human ingenuity and enable prosperity—and that neither compromises freedom and human rights. Think of the World Trade Organization, founded to help facilitate trade, establish commercial norms, and adjudicate disputes… but for data.

Today, the world needs a World Data Organization to help coordinate disparate responses to looming digital threats and opportunities. A secretariat would be established to help member states create a universal set of digital norms that can be adopted by the group (with a particular focus on artificial intelligence, privacy, intellectual property, citizens' rights, and data) alongside an enforcement mechanism to help mediate any potential disagreements between parties.

It won't be easy. Although the United States and Europe share a common foundation of democratic values, they have very different views on issues such as data privacy and government surveillance. Europe has been moving to impose new controls and push back on the power of the large US tech firms that dominate social media, online search, e-commerce, and cloud computing—as well as those companies that are at the forefront of the technologies that will drive the economy of the future (think: driverless cars, advanced factory automation, and AI). The US, meanwhile, has been backing away from its traditional global leadership, while sowing doubts about its security commitments to its traditional European allies. Other countries like India may hesitate to join the West, preferring to remain non-aligned.

But imagine if the US, Europe, and other democratic allies such as Japan are able to find a way to bridge their differences and present a common democratic front on data norms and governance. The US remains the epicenter of the West's tech innovation. Europe will bring its expertise in tech regulation to the proceedings, and Japan will bring its tech talents and willingness to roll out innovative new technologies to society at large.

A WDO in this mold would act as a counter to the rising threat of a Chinese digital alternative. But it's also a long-term bid to get China to play ball with the West rather than to try to isolate a country already far too big to isolate. If Western countries can create a workable framework to govern digital matters and disputes (complete with a functioning secretariat and adjudication system), the hope is to entice China to join as the best means of reaching the West's consumer markets.

Again, a WDO is not just about China—it is also about uniting a West that is itself quickly fragmenting over digital issues. In recent years, Europe has shown a willingness to go its own way when it comes to monitoring and protecting their citizens' digital privacy with the rollout of its General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Japan remains allied with the US, but not particularly deeply on tech issues.

The world's democracies need to compromise amongst themselves to develop a strong multilateral architecture that reflects their collective rules and values. Then, if others opt out of joining the WDO (like China, but also countries like Russia and Iran), at least the new "Berlin Wall of data" will include the whole developed world—and most of the global economy—on the right side.

The establishment of a WDO with clear rules and regulations is the best way to persuade China and others hostile to the West these days of the value of peaceful digital-age co-existence. It's also an ideal vehicle to unite Western powers in defense of Western values of individual liberty.

Demography is destiny. That ominous-sounding pronouncement, credited to French philosopher Auguste Comte, is today taken to mean that a nation's fate depends on the youthfulness of its population. For a poor country to become rich, it needs lots of young people ready to work, to support those too old or too young to work, and to pay taxes. This is called the "demographic dividend."

That's an important part of China's success story. Over the past 40 years, more than one billion people have emerged from poverty in China. Waves of young people surged from the countryside into cities to work in factories. The state invested in education, and wages helped young workers, and then their children, go to school. The state also began a drive to develop the technologies of the future, by any means necessary. In China, once dirt-poor, hundreds of millions have created a middle class.

More Show less

Not everyone thinks that President Biden's decision to pull all US troops out of Afghanistan by 9/11/21 is a good idea. Conservative Congressman Mike Waltz (R-FL), a combat-decorated Green Beret with multiple tours in Afghanistan, thinks that the US still needs to maintain a small presence in the country to avoid incurring "massive risks." In a spirited discussion with Ian Bremmer on GZERO World, Waltz, who served as counterterrorism advisor in the George W. Bush administration, argues, "The next 9/11, the next Pulse Night Club, which is right on the edge of my congressional district, the next San Bernardino, that's now on Biden's watch. He owns it with this decision." Their conversation is featured in the upcoming episode of GZERO World, which airs on US public television starting Friday, April 23. Check local listings.

Vaccines are the best hope to end the COVID-19 pandemic. But rich countries are hogging most of the doses, with more than 83 percent of shots administered to date having gone to residents in high- and upper-middle-income countries. Most poor countries will have to wait years to achieve widespread vaccination, according to one study.

To address this inequity some stakeholders are pushing hard for waivers to intellectual-property (IP) rights through World Trade Organization trade rules so that manufacturers in poorer countries can make their own vaccines locally. India and South Africa have been leading the charge, which would essentially mean that deep-pocketed pharma companies like New York-based Pfizer, for instance, would have to hand over the keys to the kingdom, allowing local companies in New Delhi and Johannesberg to make generic versions of their vaccines.

Unsurprisingly, the debate has gotten fiery, with passionate arguments emerging both for and against.

More Show less

Carl Bildt, former Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Sweden, shares his perspective on Europe In 60 Seconds:

What are the Russians up to against Ukraine?

We simply don't know, except the fact that they're concentrating a huge amount of military forces. And you don't do that for nothing or for fun. They are there for a purpose, to have pressure or to undertake limited to larger operations. We simply don't know. And when Putin delivered his State of the Union speech the other day, he didn't say a thing about this. They are now talking about withdrawing the forces. But let's wait and see. They have talked about withdrawing forces from Syria for a long time, but we haven't seen that as of yet.

More Show less

Australia rips up Belt & Road deal: Australia cancelled two 2018 deals signed between Victoria, Australia's wealthiest state, and the Chinese government, that committed the two sides to working together on initiatives under China's Belt and Road infrastructure development program. Foreign Minister Marise Payne said that the agreements "were adverse to our foreign relations." Similar deals between Victoria and institutions in Iran and Syria were also abandoned by the Australian government this week, under a 2020 law that allows Canberra to nullify international agreements struck at local and state level. (Australian universities say the "foreign veto bill" amounts to "significant overreach.") Meanwhile, Beijing hit back, calling the move "unreasonable and provocative," and accusing Canberra of further stoking divisions after a series of escalatory moves by both sides that have seen China-Australia relations deteriorate to their worst point in decades. Chinese investment in Australia dropped by 62 percent last year, a massive blow for Australia's export-reliant economy.

More Show less

50: The US will aim to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent from 2005 levels by the end of the decade. The Biden administration's commitment, double the goal set by Barack Obama almost six years ago, was announced to coincide with a virtual Earth Day climate summit attended by dozens of world leaders.

More Show less

Russian president Vladimir Putin on Wednesday threatened an "asymmetrical, rapid, and harsh" response for anyone that dares to cross a "red line" with Russia.

What's the red line? Putin says he'll decide on a case-by-case basis. And the cases at the moment are growing: the US has sanctioned Russia over cyber crimes; Putin critic Alexei Navalny is near death in a Russian prison; the Czechs say Russia blew up a Czech munitions depot; and as many as 120,000 Russian troops are reported to be massing along Russia's border with Eastern Ukraine.

Which is to say: there's potentially a Sol Lewitt's-worth of red lines to ponder now.

Subscribe to GZERO Media's newsletter, Signal

The GZERO World Podcast with Ian Bremmer. Listen now.

GZEROMEDIA

Subscribe to GZERO Media's newsletter: Signal