Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Analysis

OJ Simpson had the “Trial of the Century.” Our Century.

​FILE PHOTO: O.J. Simpson, wearing the blood stained gloves found by Los Angeles Police and entered into evidence in Simpson's murder trial, displays his hands to the jury at the request of prosecutor Christopher Darden in this file photograph from June 15, 1995 as his attorney Johnnie Cochran, Jr. (R.) looks on.

FILE PHOTO: O.J. Simpson, wearing the blood stained gloves found by Los Angeles Police and entered into evidence in Simpson's murder trial, displays his hands to the jury at the request of prosecutor Christopher Darden in this file photograph from June 15, 1995 as his attorney Johnnie Cochran, Jr. (R.) looks on.

REUTERS/Sam Mircovich/Files/File Photo
Make us preferred on Google

“White Bronco.” “Lance Ito.” “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit.” “Kato Caelin.” “Johnny Cochran.” Each of these names and moments associated with the 1995 murder trial of ex-football star OJ Simpson, who died of cancer on Wednesday at 76, is a time warp for anyone in America who was even remotely conscious in the mid-1990s.

Simpson, to recall, was accused of killing his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ron Goldman. And while the proceedings were nearly 30 years ago, there are many ways in which the “trial of the century” lives on today.


For one thing, it helped get America hooked on 24/7 media. These days, when every utterance of every politician, celebrity, conspiracy theorist, or cat is instantly seen and shared by tens of millions on social media, it’s hard to fully grasp just how revolutionary the coverage of the Simpson trial was.

Even before Judge Lance Ito decided to allow cameras in the courtroom, a third of Americans had already tuned in to watch live helicopter-cam footage of the most famous car chase in American history: Simpson’s white Ford Bronco gliding slowly through LA traffic, pursued gingerly by several police cars.

Then, in a first, CNN and Court TV covered nearly every minute of the trial, which lasted eight months. In today’s terms, it was the first livestream. And it certainly produced what we would come to see as “viral moments” – the Bronco chase, OJ trying on the glove, Cochran rhyming to the jury: “If it doesn't fit, you must acquit.”

An America that was just getting used to cable TV quickly became hooked on a televised scandal that had it all: race, class, celebrity, and murder. TV amped the drama, and the drama amped TV, pumping it directly into America’s wide-open eyeballs for over a year. Even President Bill Clinton was reported to have stepped out of a meeting to watch the final verdict.

Racial tensions created parallel realities. Simpson went on trial at a moment of high racial tension in America. Just three years earlier, a mostly white jury acquitted four LA police officers caught on camera beating Rodney King, a Black motorist. The verdict enraged much of Black America and sparked some of the worst race riots the country had seen in years.

And three years later, there was Simpson, a wealthy Black athlete accused of murdering his white ex-wife. Views of the evidence – which, again, the entire country could see alongside the jury – split dramatically along racial lines. Most whites thought he was guilty, most Blacks thought he was framed.

As it happened, Simpson’s all-star lawyers ran laps around the hapless prosecution, and the majority-Black jury acquitted Simpson.

But that settled nothing in the court of public opinion. A poll at the time showed that three-quarters of Black Americans believed that Simpson was innocent, while fewer than half of white Americans thought the jury had reached the right verdict.

It was not until 20 years later – after Simpson, convicted of liability for the murders in a separate civil case, wrote a quasi-confessional book titled, amazingly, “If I Did It” – that a majority of Black America would come to believe that Simpson was guilty. Even then, there was still a 25-point difference between white and Black views.

But class was also part of the drama. A huge majority of Americans believed that Simpson’s immense wealth had helped him beat the rap.

After all, his lawyers, known as the “Dream Team,” included some of the most prominent (and expensive) attorneys in America – not only Cochran, but towering figures like Alan Dershowitz, F. Lee Bailey, and Robert Shapiro. A dream like that isn’t purchased for a song.

So alongside the racial dimension of the verdict, many Americans saw it as evidence that the wealthy get a different – and more lenient – justice system than the rest of us. Three-quarters of Americans polled said that Simpson would’ve been found guilty if he weren’t rich.

What does it all look like three decades later? A merciless media cycle, a public engrossed in a drama of race, class, and justice, parallel views of the same facts -- in the end, wherever you were when you saw OJ Simpson fleeing the police, trying on those gloves, or swearing that he “would not, could not, and did not kill anyone,” we are all, in a sense, still living in the world that OJ left us.

More For You

A destroyed tank is seen in a field in the aftermath of fighting between the Ethiopian National Defence Force (ENDF) and the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) forces in Kasagita town, in Afar region, Ethiopia.

A destroyed tank is seen in a field in the aftermath of fighting between the Ethiopian National Defence Force (ENDF) and the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) forces in Kasagita town, in Afar region, Ethiopia, February 25, 2022.

REUTERS/Tiksa Negeri
Four years ago, a peace agreement ended one of the deadliest conflicts of this century, the Tigray War in northern Ethiopia. Fighting between the Ethiopian federal government and the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), a political party and armed rebel movement controlling the northern Tigray region, claimed 600,000 lives and displaced over 5 [...]
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the 81st United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) at UN headquarters in New York City.

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the 81st United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) at UN headquarters in New York City, US, September 24, 2026.

REUTERS/EDUARDO MUNOZ
As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu took the stage at the UN General Assembly yesterday, more than half of the delegates in the room stood up and walked out. In fact, some entered the assembly hall minutes beforehand only to walk out when Netanyahu began speaking.After the walkout, he proclaimed, “If there are any other moral cowards who [...]
British Prime Minister Andy Burnham attends the Middle East peace event "The Road Ahead: One Year After the New York Declaration and the Comprehensive 20-point Peace Plan" with French President Emmanuel Macron and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham attends the Middle East peace event "The Road Ahead: One Year After the New York Declaration and the Comprehensive 20-point Peace Plan" with French President Emmanuel Macron and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, during the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) at UN headquarters in New York City, U.S., September 22, 2026.

REUTERS/Toby Melville/Pool
The world’s middle powers are talking a great deal about the need to work together at the UN this week. French President Emmanuel Macron spoke of reviving multilateralism; South Korean President Lee Jae Myung talked about the “cherished value of multilateral cooperation”; British Prime Minister Andy Burnham discussed the need to “work together to [...]
Can the UN survive what comes next?

US President Trump speaks at the 81st United Nations General Assembly

United Nations
“To the victor belong the spoils,” US President Donald Trump declared before the UN General Assembly in New York on Tuesday. Trump was talking about the massive oil deal the US struck with Venezuela this year following the ouster of strongman Nicolás Maduro. But the message – and the very Trumpian approach to geopolitics behind it – was clear: the [...]