US election seen from Brazil: Trump "polarized Brazilians"

US election seen from Brazil: Trump "polarized Brazilians"

Guga Chacra is a correspondent for GloboNews and the O Globo newspaper in Brazil. Our conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

Alex Kliment: What are some ways that the outcome of the US election this fall could affect Brazil?

GC: [Brazilian president] Jair Bolsonaro is a big fan of Trump. So what many Brazilians are afraid of is first, how would Bolsonaro deal with Biden? Bolsonaro sees Biden as a socialist, as a leftist, and he hates leftists. And he even might think that Biden is a communist.

The second thing that Brazilians are afraid of is, with Biden in power, becoming a pariah internationally, especially regarding the environment and the Amazon.

And third, without Trump, Bolsonaro loses a bit of the far-right narrative that he uses now, because he can say, "look, the president of the United States, he's just like me." If he doesn't have the US any more, his narrative could go down.


AK: And if Trump wins?

GC: That would be a major victory for Bolsonaro and for the right-wing ideology that Bolsonaro, Trump, [Hungarian Prime minister] Orban, [Polish president] Duda and [Israeli Prime Minister] Netanyahu all share. And it would be really helpful for Bolsonaro going for his re-election in 2022.

AK: Are there other issues in US-Brazil relations that could change significantly?

GC: I think the most important thing for the United States regarding Brazil now is 5G. They don't want Brazil to let Huawei take control of the 5G infrastructure in Brazil. And that won't change between Trump and Biden.

The problem for the United States is that Trump at least has this personal relationship with Bolsonaro. And so he could convince Bolsonaro [to rebuff the Chinese]. With Biden, Bolsonaro might end up with the Chinese.

China has problems with Bolsonaro, yes, but at the end of the day, they are the major trade partner of Brazil. They import a lot from Brazil, much more than the United States. So they are more important for Brazil than the United States now. So it will be tough for Biden to convince Brazil not to adopt the 5G from Huawei.

AK: How does Brazil fit into the US-China rivalry more broadly?

GC: It's hard for Brazil because Brazil feels closer to the United States, admires the United States. The culture of the United States is really strong in Brazil. But at the same time, economically, for agro-business in Brazil, China is really important. So you need China in Brazil. And we can't forget that the United States is also a rival of Brazil when we talk about soybeans, including soybeans that are sold to China. So there is that.

AK: Looking back, how did the 2016 US election change things for Brazil?

GC: Trump is the first American president that actually polarized Brazilians. There was almost no one who liked Bush in Brazil and almost all Brazilians liked Obama. But with Trump it's interesting because the Bolsonaro voters, they love Trump, and the other Brazilians, they hate Trump.

I don't think that Bolsonaro would have been able to win [in 2018] without Trump being in power in the United States, even though I think Bolsonaro and Trump are really different.

AK: Has the image of the US changed?

GC: Yes. When I was younger, for example, most of the Brazilians would want to come to the United States to study as exchange student or for college or grad school. And that doesn't happen any more. Many still want to come to the United States for MBAs or LLMs, but younger Brazilians are going to Australia and New Zealand to study English. And when they want to go to college, they are choosing Canada instead of the United States. They are just afraid of what could happen to them if they come to the United States.

AK: What are the most important everyday issues on the minds of Brazilians right now?

GC: I would mention first, COVID-19, and the second thing would be for sure, the Brazilian economy. But Brazilians don't blame Bolsonaro for the situation. Most people in Brazil think he inherited a major crisis and then there was the pandemic, so it's not his fault. But he has to improve the Brazilian economic situation. And the third thing is still the violence in Brazil, which is still really strong, when you compare it to other major countries around the world.

AK: Are Brazilians watching the conduct of the US election for any examples or lessons?

GC: I think one thing is social media, because I think social media in Brazil has had as much impact — or maybe even more impact — as the United States. Twitter in Brazil is as strong as it is in the United States. The same thing applies for Facebook. But Brazil has one other thing, WhatsApp, which you don't use as much in the United States. And [on WhatsApp] you cannot trace fake posts as easily as you can on Twitter or Facebook. So I think Brazil will be paying attention to that.

AK: What about the legitimacy of the vote itself?

GC: Well, elections in Brazil are really different from the United States. In Brazil you need a voter ID, and you must vote — it's mandatory. That's different from the United States. Voting in Brazil is electronic, in the United States it isn't. In the US you can vote by mail. In Brazil, you can't.

I would say elections are one of the few things where Brazilians are more organized than the Americans. So I think the impact of the American election, if there is a problem, will just show the Brazilians that our model is actually good.

This interview is part of the GZERO project Global voices on the US election, which you can find in full here.

Demography is destiny. That ominous-sounding pronouncement, credited to French philosopher Auguste Comte, is today taken to mean that a nation's fate depends on the youthfulness of its population. For a poor country to become rich, it needs lots of young people ready to work, to support those too old or too young to work, and to pay taxes. This is called the "demographic dividend."

That's an important part of China's success story. Over the past 40 years, more than one billion people have emerged from poverty in China. Waves of young people surged from the countryside into cities to work in factories. The state invested in education, and wages helped young workers, and then their children, go to school. The state also began a drive to develop the technologies of the future, by any means necessary. In China, once dirt-poor, hundreds of millions have created a middle class.

More Show less

Vaccines are the best hope to end the COVID-19 pandemic. But rich countries are hogging most of the doses, with more than 83 percent of shots administered to date having gone to residents in high- and upper-middle-income countries. Most poor countries will have to wait years to achieve widespread vaccination, according to one study.

To address this inequity some stakeholders are pushing hard for waivers to intellectual-property (IP) rights through World Trade Organization trade rules so that manufacturers in poorer countries can make their own vaccines locally. India and South Africa have been leading the charge, which would essentially mean that deep-pocketed pharma companies like New York-based Pfizer, for instance, would have to hand over the keys to the kingdom, allowing local companies in New Delhi and Johannesberg to make generic versions of their vaccines.

Unsurprisingly, the debate has gotten fiery, with passionate arguments emerging both for and against.

More Show less

Carl Bildt, former Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Sweden, shares his perspective on Europe In 60 Seconds:

What are the Russians up to against Ukraine?

We simply don't know, except the fact that they're concentrating a huge amount of military forces. And you don't do that for nothing or for fun. They are there for a purpose, to have pressure or to undertake limited to larger operations. We simply don't know. And when Putin delivered his State of the Union speech the other day, he didn't say a thing about this. They are now talking about withdrawing the forces. But let's wait and see. They have talked about withdrawing forces from Syria for a long time, but we haven't seen that as of yet.

More Show less

Australia rips up Belt & Road deal: Australia cancelled two 2018 deals signed between Victoria, Australia's wealthiest state, and the Chinese government, that committed the two sides to working together on initiatives under China's Belt and Road infrastructure development program. Foreign Minister Marise Payne said that the agreements "were adverse to our foreign relations." Similar deals between Victoria and institutions in Iran and Syria were also abandoned by the Australian government this week, under a 2020 law that allows Canberra to nullify international agreements struck at local and state level. (Australian universities say the "foreign veto bill" amounts to "significant overreach.") Meanwhile, Beijing hit back, calling the move "unreasonable and provocative," and accusing Canberra of further stoking divisions after a series of escalatory moves by both sides that have seen China-Australia relations deteriorate to their worst point in decades. Chinese investment in Australia dropped by 62 percent last year, a massive blow for Australia's export-reliant economy.

More Show less

50: The US will aim to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent from 2005 levels by the end of the decade. The Biden administration's commitment, double the goal set by Barack Obama almost six years ago, was announced to coincide with a virtual Earth Day climate summit attended by dozens of world leaders.

More Show less

Russian president Vladimir Putin on Wednesday threatened an "asymmetrical, rapid, and harsh" response for anyone that dares to cross a "red line" with Russia.

What's the red line? Putin says he'll decide on a case-by-case basis. And the cases at the moment are growing: the US has sanctioned Russia over cyber crimes; Putin critic Alexei Navalny is near death in a Russian prison; the Czechs say Russia blew up a Czech munitions depot; and as many as 120,000 Russian troops are reported to be massing along Russia's border with Eastern Ukraine.

Which is to say: there's potentially a Sol Lewitt's-worth of red lines to ponder now.

Europe has been hit by a green wave in recent years. Green parties in countries as varied as Germany, Belgium, France, Ireland, Finland, and Sweden have made sizable electoral gains, with some now sitting in national governments.

The Green phenomenon seems to be gaining yet more momentum in the lead up to some crucial European elections (Germany, France) in the months ahead. What explains the green shift, and where might this trend be headed?

More Show less

Subscribe to GZERO Media's newsletter, Signal

The GZERO World Podcast with Ian Bremmer. Listen now.

GZEROMEDIA

Subscribe to GZERO Media's newsletter: Signal